IGCSE/GCSE/O & A Level/IB/University Student Forum

Qualification => GCE AS & A2 Level => Queries => Topic started by: Saladin on April 04, 2010, 04:28:00 pm

Title: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 04, 2010, 04:28:00 pm
Hey u guys, post all ur doubts here, and I will do my best to answer them form u.

Just trying out the tex editor.

cos(x)=\pm\sqrt{\frac{3}{4}}
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 06, 2010, 04:55:15 pm
i hope chemistry doubts go here as well
past paper says:

 The equilibrium constant, Kc, for the reaction to form ethyl ethanoate from ethanol and ethanoic
acid, C2H5OH + CH3CO2H CH3CO2C2H5 + H2O, at 60(degree)C is 4.00.
When 1.00 mol each of ethanol and ethanoic acid are allowed to reach equilibrium at 60(degree)C, what
is the number of moles of ethyl ethanoate formed?
A 1/3
B 2/3
C 1/4
D 3/4
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: 3ishakay on April 06, 2010, 05:55:25 pm
i hope chemistry doubts go here as well
past paper says:

 The equilibrium constant, Kc, for the reaction to form ethyl ethanoate from ethanol and ethanoic
acid, C2H5OH + CH3CO2H CH3CO2C2H5 + H2O, at 60(degree)C is 4.00.
When 1.00 mol each of ethanol and ethanoic acid are allowed to reach equilibrium at 60(degree)C, what
is the number of moles of ethyl ethanoate formed?
A 1/3
B 2/3
C 1/4
D 3/4



hey ... dyu noe the anser to tht?
wht paper ist frm?

im thinkn the anser is B = 2/3

this is how i did it ..(any1 tell me if i got it wrong .. plz!!)


                      ethanol   +     ethanoic acid    ----->   ethylethanoate   +     water
                      C2H5OH   +    CH3CO2H         ------->  CH3CO2C2H5     +     H2O

b4 eq.                  1                   1                                   0                      0

aftr eq.                1-x                1-x                                 x                       x




thn Kc= [ethylethanoate][water]
            -----------------------
            [ethanol][ethanoic acid]


so its like  


          [ x]^2           =  4
        --------
          [1-x]^2


thn u ju solv it like in maths ..

and thn u get 2/3 =D

rechek the smae crap..


go


           ( 2/3)^2              =    4!!   TADA!!! :D:D:D
          ----------
            (1/3)^2




Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 06, 2010, 06:05:15 pm
hey Thanks :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: 3ishakay on April 06, 2010, 06:10:19 pm
hey Thanks :)

not a prbm  8)   ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 06, 2010, 06:11:54 pm
the answer is b??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 06, 2010, 06:12:49 pm
the answer is b??? ???

U have doubts??
Wait, I'll check her post agn
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 06, 2010, 06:17:10 pm
lool no...i get it..i was checking i didnt read 3ishakay post  :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: 3ishakay on April 06, 2010, 06:19:30 pm
lool no...i get it..i was checking i didnt read 3ishakay post  :P


lol cool ..

By the way im not sure abt my post .
i always use the revers method cus its fastr.

im not evn sure if the math bit turns out ryt .. :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 06, 2010, 06:19:41 pm
Yup she's right :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on April 06, 2010, 07:15:39 pm
PHYSICS AS
could u just explain how to solve this question step by step please?

Jill is swimming across a river which has  constant current of "k m/s". if jill heads directly across the river with speed "v m/s"
find her resultant speed and the angle her path makes with a line directly across the river when
k= 2
v=1
 thx alot ;D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 06, 2010, 07:18:03 pm
really sorry u guys, my electricity was out, so i cud not ansa.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 06, 2010, 07:23:09 pm
PHYSICS AS
could u just explain how to solve this question step by step please?

Jill is swimming across a river which has  constant current of "k m/s". if jill heads directly across the river with speed "v m/s"
find her resultant speed and the angle her path makes with a line directly across the river when
k= 2
v=1
 thx alot ;D


this is a simple trigonometric question.

electricity going again

srry cud not reply

cant scan the thing

will wen i can

thanks


hope u guys dnt mind.

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 07, 2010, 09:04:59 am
4got 2 mention th answer was b
thanx!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 07, 2010, 09:51:32 am
PHYSICS AS
could u just explain how to solve this question step by step please?

Jill is swimming across a river which has  constant current of "k m/s". if jill heads directly across the river with speed "v m/s"
find her resultant speed and the angle her path makes with a line directly across the river when
k= 2
v=1
 thx alot ;D


R= root of k2 + v2
= root of 5

tan theta= k/v=2
theta= 63.43o clockwise  down the stream
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 07, 2010, 07:11:32 pm
more chemistry doubts..

cud u plz help me in  Q.30> the ms says 'A' but why is it not ethanol?
                            Q.20> ms says "c"
                            Q.2>   ms says ' B'


ruby, is it chemistry?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 07, 2010, 07:18:52 pm
I'm a lil worked up atm....please give me a day
Thanks
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 07, 2010, 07:27:16 pm
more chemistry doubts..

cud u plz help me in  Q.30> the ms says 'A' but why is it not ethanol?
                            Q.20> ms says "c"
                            Q.2>   ms says ' B'


ruby, is it chemistry?
ohh sorryy yeh
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 07, 2010, 07:38:21 pm
C6H12 + 9O2 ----> 6CO2 + 6H2O

so, in 'P' 6*18 = 108g of water r absorbed which = increase in mass at P

at Q 6*44=264g of CO2 r absorbed = increase in mass at Q

so 108/ 264= 0.41 = Mp/ Mq

hope u understud 8)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 07, 2010, 07:43:13 pm
Thank You
paper 2 O/N 2003 Q3...
all the parts with the calculations involved  ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 07, 2010, 07:51:00 pm
be a lil more specific
or do u want the whole q to be done?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 07, 2010, 08:02:51 pm
b ii,iii
cii and d
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 07:40:35 am
b)ii)H=mcdt
=200x4.2X12.2=10.25KJ

iii) 1g gives out 10.25 KJ
    1 mole=??
1 mole of calcium=40.1g
so H released with 40.1g=40.1X10.25=- 411KJ/mol  exothermix(heat released)

c)ii) Ca(s) + 2H2O(l) ? Ca(OH)2(aq) + H2(g) ?H = –411
dh of formation of water= -286kJ/mol  since 2 moles of water =2X-286= -  572
dh reaction= h of products-h of reactants
      -411  = X- (-572)
       X= -411-572=-983KJ/mol

d) In b(ii) 1g of Ca ws used...1g of ca= 1/40.1 moles=0.025moles
   Ratio of Ca:H2=1:1
therefore 0.025 moles of H2 formed
1 moles occupies 24dm3
0.025mol=0.025X24=0.6dm3/ 600cm3
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 09:52:57 am
more chemistry doubts..

cud u plz help me in  Q.30> the ms says 'A' but why is it not ethanol?
                            Q.20> ms says "c"
                            Q.2>   ms says ' B'

plzzzzzzzz, sum1 answer my que's >:(
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 10:08:36 am
Please be patient....y r u getting furious..
We all have to study here....some1 will always answer when free

2) 30% x= 144
x=144X100/30=480g

P2=32X2=64g
% of P2= 64/480 X100
=13.1%

20) U have to try out all the possible outcomes with 4 carbons
You get 5 possibilities....try it

30) Ethanol will not react with NaOH at all....
Ethanol will only react with metals, not metal compounds..keep that in mind

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 12:12:19 pm
newayz, am sorry :P

for Q20. i got da 3 structural isomers( primary, secondary & tertiary)
            one cis and trans.
            1 optical isomers and its reflection

and this adds up to  7 ???

OR do we consider both the cis and trans as 1 isomer?

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 08, 2010, 12:27:28 pm
cis trans and optic isomers are not possible since it has a single bond.
stereo isomerism is only possible for compounds with a double bond
they can have 5 structural only, ie primary alcohol and secondary alcohol and tertiary alcohol, two of the methyl groups can also be shifted.
ans is therefore C) 5
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 12:59:30 pm
 oops , i just missed dat  :P

 but optical isomers dont have
double bonds ,

so ya 3 structural and 2 optical,  which adds up to 5..... rite??

Thank You :-*
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 08, 2010, 01:29:39 pm
ohh sorry yeh optical isomers dont have double bonds....
i think ur pretty much rite
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 01:45:02 pm
Thank You :)

Q.19. i never get such que's rite, any hint...
Q20. i found 6 but the ms says 8.. how???
Q28. isnt it dat 1molecule of 2,4 DNPH is needed for each ketone grp ( By the way what's  X )??


thanks 4 any help :-*
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 05:47:13 pm
Q19) A chiral center has 4 different groups attached to the carbon
I'll circle the carbons which have a chiral center...check the attachment

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 06:15:39 pm
but the carbon atom attached 2 da OH group has only 3 groups attached to it.. where is da 4th one?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 06:17:43 pm
A chiral centre is a carbon centre with four different groups(they could be any group...not necessarily carbon groups.....the fourth bond is with a hydrogen...)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 06:29:25 pm
Thank You :-*
got it :-*
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 06:29:51 pm
gr8  :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 08, 2010, 06:39:04 pm
20) 2 abt each double bond makes 6
further if u consider the whole chain, ull find 2 more...
actually it'll take tooooooo much time to draw the whole thing out....but if u really want it, i shall do it tom and scan it

28)2,4 DNP reacts with carbonyl compound with C=O group

1 already present...
2 formed at the other 2 double bonds
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 08, 2010, 07:56:07 pm
if a carboxylic acid was formed, will da c=o group in da acid react with 2,4 DNPH ??

thanx so much , i really appreciate ur help :-*

cud u also help me in Q4 , 29 of da same year???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 09, 2010, 06:02:20 am
no it doesn't react with carbonyl groups in acids,esters and amides
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 09, 2010, 06:14:24 am
k
Q4) D

first thing when u c these graphs..look for the obvious
you know 18 protons/eletcrons....electronic configuration 2.8.8 so 0 unpaired electrons....it will be either B or D
Now look at the other proton numbers....you knw electrons are filled singly until there is no more space to....
So upto proton no 15, it is filled singly, no of unpaired electrons increase. Then, they start pairing up, after proton no 15, reducing the no of unpaired electrons.
eg. take 15 electrons
1s22s22p63s2 3p3
the 3 electrons in the p subshell are in the 3 different orbitals and so 15 has the max no of unpaired electrons...3
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 09, 2010, 06:18:25 am
Q29) D

check where the OH groups r
in A, B n C if dehydration happens, double bonds will form as shown in the compound but in D, one OH group is in the centre, which will not give a double bond like desired in the two ends.

I hope ur getting me :-\
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 09, 2010, 04:09:52 pm
ya got it :D
Thank You :-*
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 09, 2010, 05:42:39 pm
Which of the following would behave most like an ideal gas at room temperature?

A carbon dioxide

B helium

C hydrogen

D nitrogen

da answer for this is helium, but why cant it be hydrogen?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 09, 2010, 05:44:57 pm
Hydrogen is reactive..

It will have intermolecular force...they exist as diatomic molecules which is not close to being an ideal gas at all
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 09, 2010, 06:05:02 pm
o/n 2004 paper 2
Q 28
39(why is 2 wrong?)
35(why not 3)
34(why is 3 right, wont half filled orbitals have high IE values?)
33(why not 2 and 3)

m/j 2004 paper 1
28) D agn
monosubstituted alkene, one R group is attached to the carbon-carbon double bond. Not oxidized by mild oxidising agents

i dont understand this
 ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 11, 2010, 11:03:53 am
i have some more chem questions :
w 02
3) Use of the Data Booklet is relevant to this question.
In the gas phase, aluminium and a transition element require the same amount of energy to form
one mole of an ion with a 2+ charge.
What is the transition element?
A Co
B Cr
C Cu
D Ni

the other 2 are attached -i couldnt copy paste

mj06
2 A sample of chlorine containing isotopes of mass numbers 35 and 37 was analysed in a
mass-spectrometer.
How many peaks corresponding to Cl2+ were recorded?
A 2
B 3
C 4
D 5
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 11, 2010, 11:07:01 am
In 6 hours
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 11, 2010, 12:46:32 pm
w02
3.(from the data booklet) Al has a 1st I.E. of 577 and a 2nd I.E. of 1820
so the total i.e. when forming an ion with a 2+ charge is 577+1820=2397
(also from data booklet) Co has a 1st I.E. of 757 and 2nd I.E. of 1640
so the total energy to form a 2+ charge is also 2397
therefore the answer is A

w06
i dont get this  ???  :(
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 11, 2010, 12:55:19 pm
i have some more chem questions :
w 02
3) Use of the Data Booklet is relevant to this question.
In the gas phase, aluminium and a transition element require the same amount of energy to form
one mole of an ion with a 2+ charge.
What is the transition element?
A Co
B Cr
C Cu
D Ni

the other 2 are attached -i couldnt copy paste

mj06
2 A sample of chlorine containing isotopes of mass numbers 35 and 37 was analysed in a
mass-spectrometer.
How many peaks corresponding to Cl2+ were recorded?
A 2
B 3
C 4
D 5

mj 2006:

answer is B (3)

u have a 3 types of chlorine molecules

(35,35)
(35,37)
(37,37)

i.e one chlorine atom with 35,other with 37, etc..
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on April 11, 2010, 12:57:07 pm
mj 2006:

answer is B (3)

u have a 3 types of chlorine molecules

(35,35)
(35,37)
(37,37)

i.e one chlorine atom with 35,other with 37, etc..


could u explain this in more detain please  ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 13, 2010, 07:12:28 am
w02
3.(from the data booklet) Al has a 1st I.E. of 577 and a 2nd I.E. of 1820
so the total i.e. when forming an ion with a 2+ charge is 577+1820=2397
(also from data booklet) Co has a 1st I.E. of 757 and 2nd I.E. of 1640
so the total energy to form a 2+ charge is also 2397
therefore the answer is A

w06
i dont get this  ???  :(

Yup, that's how it is for the first one...

nov 06..which q?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 13, 2010, 07:15:45 am
could u explain this in more detain please  ??? ???

alright..here is the deal..chlorine is a diatomic element that consists of 2 atoms paired up, right?

there are 2 isotopes of chlorine, 35 and 37..therefore, it is possible to have only 3 combinations of these 2 isotopes..

1) a diatomic molecule with one 35 Cl atom, and 1 35 Cl atom
2) a diatomic molecule with one 35 Cl atom, and 1 37 Cl atom
3) a diatomic molecule with one 37 Cl atom, and one 37 Cl atom

got that?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 13, 2010, 07:22:29 am
could u explain this in more detain please  ??? ???

Chlorine has two isotopes, 35Cl and 37Cl, in the approximate ratio of 3 atoms of 35Cl to 1 atom of 37Cl. You might suppose that the mass spectrum would look like this:


(http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/masspec/clmasspec.GIF)

The problem is that chlorine consists of molecules, not individual atoms. When chlorine is passed into the ionisation chamber, an electron is knocked off the molecule to give a molecular ion, Cl2+. These ions won't be particularly stable, and some will fall apart to give a chlorine atom and a Cl+ ion. The term for this is fragmentation.

(http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/masspec/cl2eq.GIF)

If the Cl atom formed isn't then ionised in the ionisation chamber, it simply gets lost in the machine - neither accelerated nor deflected.

The Cl+ ions will pass through the machine and will give lines at 35 and 37, depending on the isotope and you would get exactly the pattern in the last diagram. The problem is that you will also record lines for the unfragmented Cl2+ ions.

Think about the possible combinations of chlorine-35 and chlorine-37 atoms in a Cl2+ ion.

Both atoms could be 35Cl, both atoms could be 37Cl, or you could have one of each sort. That would give you total masses of the Cl2+ ion of:

35 + 35 = 70

35 + 37 = 72

37 + 37 = 74

That means that you would get a set of lines in the m/z = 70 region looking like this:
(http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/masspec/cl2masspec.GIF)

The overall mass spectrum looks like this:

(http://www.chemguide.co.uk/analysis/masspec/cl2overallms.gif)

yaa?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 13, 2010, 03:37:49 pm
Sorry to break up all the Chem discussions guys :P but I need to get some physics doubts straight here.

1)  Does a material vibrates at its maximum amplitude when its at its fundamental frequency compared to its other modes of vibration.   If so then isnt fundamental frequency of a material the same thing as the materials natural frequency.

2) Can someone tell me the differences between a single slit interference and double slit and if light can produce an interference pattern through a single slit, when one of the double slits are covered sholdnt an interference pattern still be noticed?

3) Explanation of doppler effect when the observer is moving towards the source of sound.

Guys if u could speed up on ur replys i would be grateful hve a mock exam tommorow :-\
Much help appreciated! :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 14, 2010, 10:42:22 am
thank u all
if any1 would kindly check the attached questions (just 2 more of paper 1) - i've been carrying them around 4 more than a month now - no 1 seems 2 no how 2 do em..
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 14, 2010, 06:33:42 pm
cud sum1 plz xplain Q10 of this paper????????
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 14, 2010, 07:36:24 pm
Making it alkaline would be adding more hydroxyl anions...when conc of OH- ions increase, equilibrium will shift to the left to resist the change(le chateliers)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 14, 2010, 07:48:24 pm
Sorry to break up all the Chem discussions guys :P but I need to get some physics doubts straight here.

1)  Does a material vibrates at its maximum amplitude when its at its fundamental frequency compared to its other modes of vibration.   If so then isnt fundamental frequency of a material the same thing as the materials natural frequency.

2) Can someone tell me the differences between a single slit interference and double slit and if light can produce an interference pattern through a single slit, when one of the double slits are covered sholdnt an interference pattern still be noticed?

3) Explanation of doppler effect when the observer is moving towards the source of sound.

Guys if u could speed up on ur replys i would be grateful hve a mock exam tommorow :-\
Much help appreciated! :)

1) First of all, do not confuse the fundamental frequency with the natural frequency. From your doubts I believe you are doing Edexcel Physics AS.
And the fundamental frequency does not mean vibration at the maximum amplitude, as you have infinite multiples of the fundamental frequency; first harmonic, second harmonic, etc..

2) Interference occurs only when you have to sources of waves. Thats the main difference between single and double slits. In a single slit, diffraction only occurs. But in a double slit, interference occurs due to diffraction of waves.(http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/ntnujava/snapshotejs/20_smf_doubleSlit_20090118003214.gif)
There is NO INTERFERENCE IN SINGLE SLITS.

3) The examiner never gives you the situation where the observer moves towards the source, the opposite happens. Check out this video.. It is really helpful [yt=425,350]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-t63xYSgmKE[/yt]

Sorry for the late reply.. I just got your post  :-\
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 14, 2010, 09:03:04 pm
Making it alkaline would be adding more hydroxyl anions...when conc of OH- ions increase, equilibrium will shift to the left to resist the change(le chateliers)

isnt precipitating more V3+ ions has the same effect , so why is option B wrong?????
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 15, 2010, 05:15:30 am
Reagents are used to detect the presence of a particular ion.....
So what they mean by precipitating V3+ ions is the already existing V3+ ions are being precipitated, they are dissolved prior to the addition...there's no change in conc/amount of V3+ ions, only the existing ions dissolved would be precipitated, this will not bring about a change in equilibrium
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 15, 2010, 05:02:39 pm
Thanks for the info ~ A.F ~ preety much cleared all the doubts  :D, By the way no probs on the delay.

Thanks again.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 15, 2010, 05:07:15 pm
Thanks for the info ~ A.F ~ preety much cleared all the doubts  :D, By the way no probs on the delay.

Thanks again.

Any time mate  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on April 15, 2010, 08:59:21 pm
C2 EDEXCEL JUNE 2008 paper
q9
plzz someone explain in detailed steps how to do it :SS
thxx its URGENT
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 15, 2010, 11:21:47 pm
give me some time..um out now...when i go home
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 16, 2010, 12:28:19 am
Here u go halosh..

Hope that helped :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 16, 2010, 01:42:47 pm
any idea?:
38 Which compounds would be formed in the reaction of ethene with aqueous bromine in the
presence of sodium chloride?
1 CH2ClCH2Cl
2 CH2BrCH2Cl
3 CH2BrCH2Br

the answer is 2&3
but wat if after ethene & bromine formed dibromoethane, the Cl in NaCl replaces one Br n then th next Br is replaces by NaCl as well (since we dont no how many NaCl(s) r present) wodnt we end up w/ CH2ClCH2Cl ?
y is tht rong?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: pjb13 on April 16, 2010, 09:35:42 pm
Its abt Business St: If market supply decreases, but market demand does not, competition will increase. I dont get how competition increases ?


Loan capital is an important source of finace for many businesses. However unlike share capital, taking on an additional loan capital does not compromise ownership. Highly geared firms, whose share capital is made up mostly of loan capital, can be highly vulnerable to interest rate changes, particularly if they have not borrowed at a fixed rate. A sudden increase in the interest rate will increase their fixed costs, leading to lower profits.

Can anyone explain the exact meaning of share and loan capital? i dont get the sent in bold.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 17, 2010, 04:13:55 pm
Its abt Business St: If market supply decreases, but market demand does not, competition will increase. I dont get how competition increases ?


Loan capital is an important source of finace for many businesses. However unlike share capital, taking on an additional loan capital does not compromise ownership. Highly geared firms, whose share capital is made up mostly of loan capital, can be highly vulnerable to interest rate changes, particularly if they have not borrowed at a fixed rate. A sudden increase in the interest rate will increase their fixed costs, leading to lower profits.

Can anyone explain the exact meaning of share and loan capital? i dont get the sent in bold.

For the first part:

Well your supply is decreasing, and thus with the same amount of demand, the supply is lower then it was previously. This will trigger a rise in price. As the price rises, the product will become a more lucrative thing to supply, as more profit can be made due to the rise in price, attracting other people to come and sell the product, and thus increasing competetion.

For the second part:

Loan capital is simply loans that the business has taken out to find the buying of fixed assets. Now, if you are a highly geared business, meaning that you have taken out loads of loans and are in big time debt, then you will be severely affected by a rise in interest rates, as you have a lot of borrowed money. Thus cumulatively, you will get a hell of a lot more debt. Now as we know, debt managment is a part of a business fixed costs, and thus will increase fixed costs.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 17, 2010, 04:25:30 pm
any idea?:
38 Which compounds would be formed in the reaction of ethene with aqueous bromine in the
presence of sodium chloride?
1 CH2ClCH2Cl
2 CH2BrCH2Cl
3 CH2BrCH2Br

the answer is 2&3
but wat if after ethene & bromine formed dibromoethane, the Cl in NaCl replaces one Br n then th next Br is replaces by NaCl as well (since we dont no how many NaCl(s) r present) wodnt we end up w/ CH2ClCH2Cl ?
y is tht rong?

I literally forgot abt this one...
In a few hours
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sameee on April 17, 2010, 05:34:57 pm
any idea?:
38 Which compounds would be formed in the reaction of ethene with aqueous bromine in the
presence of sodium chloride?
1 CH2ClCH2Cl
2 CH2BrCH2Cl
3 CH2BrCH2Br

the answer is 2&3
but wat if after ethene & bromine formed dibromoethane, the Cl in NaCl replaces one Br n then th next Br is replaces by NaCl as well (since we dont no how many NaCl(s) r present) wodnt we end up w/ CH2ClCH2Cl ?
y is tht rong?

Hello SueT, well, with aqueous bromine, 2 products are formed, CH2BrCH2OH and CH2BrCH2Br, the later must be true, since its one of the choices given,no. 3. for number 2, the Cl will displace the OH in a nucleophilic substitution reaction., thus giving, CH2BrCH2Cl. No. one is NOT possible, since its a freeradicle sustitution reaction, which would have involved Cl2 gase,Not aqueous CL-, and in the Presence of UV light.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 18, 2010, 09:56:04 am
Reagents are used to detect the presence of a particular ion.....
So what they mean by precipitating V3+ ions is the already existing V3+ ions are being precipitated, they are dissolved prior to the addition...there's no change in conc/amount of V3+ ions, only the existing ions dissolved would be precipitated, this will not bring about a change in equilibrium


Thank You :-*
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 18, 2010, 10:16:50 am
hey,
i need help in these que's plz :-\

Q3, 11 and 17
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 18, 2010, 10:23:38 am
3)Al---Al+   +577 1st IE
Al+--Al2+   +1820 2nd I.E

so Al---Al2+        +2397kj/mol

Co--Co+  +757
Co+--Co2+  +1640

so Co--Co2+   + 2397 kj/mol

So A
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 18, 2010, 10:34:12 am
got it , Thank You  ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 18, 2010, 10:35:07 am
11)
         2HI(g)<-----> H2(g) + I2(g)

initial     b                   0         0
final      b-x                 x          x

total no of moles= 4
pressure = p
*pp=partial pressure
Kp= ppI2 XppH2/ pHI2
ppI2 and H2= x/4 Xp  ( moles/total no of moles X total pressure)
ppHI= b-x/4 Xp

Kp= (xp/4)X (xp/4)
       -------------
          ((b-x)p/4)2
=___x_2__
   4(b – x)2
D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 18, 2010, 10:43:54 am
15) C

when a compound has no charge...

u equate the ox states to 0
 A NH4Cl  NH4 has ox state of +1 so Cl will be -1   ruled out
 B NH4ClO3  +1 + (3x-2)[oxygen has state -2) + cl=0
                 Cl= +5   rule out
C NH4ClO4   +1 + (4X-2) + Cl=0
                  Cl=-7   here we got it :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on April 19, 2010, 11:19:39 am
Need help plz! on A2 Maths paper 3 M/J 04
Q5 (i), Q8 and Q11 (ii)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 19, 2010, 11:30:23 am
in 7 minutes

thanks A.F
I'm trying to figure waves :-X :-[
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 19, 2010, 01:29:43 pm
15) C

when a compound has no charge...

u equate the ox states to 0
 A NH4Cl  NH4 has ox state of +1 so Cl will be -1   ruled out
 B NH4ClO3  +1 + (3x-2)[oxygen has state -2) + cl=0
                 Cl= +5   rule out
C NH4ClO4   +1 + (4X-2) + Cl=0
                  Cl=-7   here we got it :)


oops, i guess u xplained da wrong que., it waz q17!!!!!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 19, 2010, 01:34:20 pm
11)
         2HI(g)<-----> H2(g) + I2(g)

initial     b                   0         0
final      b-x                 x          x

total no of moles= 4
pressure = p
*pp=partial pressure
Kp= ppI2 XppH2/ pHI2
ppI2 and H2= x/4 Xp  ( moles/total no of moles X total pressure)
ppHI= b-x/4 Xp

Kp= (xp/4)X (xp/4)
       -------------
          ((b-x)p/4)2
=___x_2__
   4(b – x)2
D

but when i simplified the eqn. u got for Kp i didnt get the rite ans.

cud u plz solve it and send it to me??????
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 19, 2010, 08:06:49 pm
but when i simplified the eqn. u got for Kp i didnt get the rite ans.

cud u plz solve it and send it to me??????

ok my bad...
that four kinda vanishes...ill do it agn..i must've made a mistake in a hurry
ill check
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 22, 2010, 06:26:53 am

 BIO!!!!!

Hey guys can someone explain to me the formation of the plant cell wall during plant cell cytokinesis ???, its annoying and my book doesnt explain it that well
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Amr Fouad on April 22, 2010, 11:49:15 am
BIO!!!!!

Hey guys can someone explain to me the formation of the plant cell wall during plant cell cytokinesis ???, its annoying and my book doesnt explain it that well
um sure nid can help. Shes our super duper bio geek :P lol
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 22, 2010, 11:53:58 am
BIO!!!!!

Hey guys can someone explain to me the formation of the plant cell wall during plant cell cytokinesis ???, its annoying and my book doesnt explain it that well

Like what... :-\

Is this A2  ???

I'm really not getting you...can you show this to me in the syllabus
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 22, 2010, 01:47:32 pm
Like what... :-\

Is this A2  ???

I'm really not getting you...can you show this to me in the syllabus


Nope it isnt A2, its in chapter 4 Biodiversity and natural resources pg-147  of the AS Bio textbook(black one) as for the syllabus (Topic 4 unit2) its a part of the 3rd and 4th points I gues :-\


Sorryzzzz to trouble u :-[ but for stem cells found in the embroyo it goes through continous divisions to maybe form a single blood cell which then cells divide to form range of blood cells until it loses its ability to further divide right ??? 
   
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: zb on April 22, 2010, 11:19:04 pm
asalamoalaikum... I have a qn from edexcel AS physics... A person weighing 100 N stands on some bathroom scales in a lift. If the scales show a reading of 110 N ,which answer could describe the motion of the lift?  A. moving downwards and decelerating       B. Moving downwards with constant velocity       C. Moving upwards and decelerating         D. Moving upwards with a constant velocity       thanks alot jaza kALLAH khairan :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: T.Q on April 22, 2010, 11:46:00 pm
asalamoalaikum... I have a qn from edexcel AS physics... A person weighing 100 N stands on some bathroom scales in a lift. If the scales show a reading of 110 N ,which answer could describe the motion of the lift?  A. moving downwards and decelerating       B. Moving downwards with constant velocity       C. Moving upwards and decelerating         D. Moving upwards with a constant velocity       thanks alot jaza kALLAH khairan :)
wa alikom il salam

the answer is D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 23, 2010, 11:27:06 am

Nope it isnt A2, its in chapter 4 Biodiversity and natural resources pg-147  of the AS Bio textbook(black one) as for the syllabus (Topic 4 unit2) its a part of the 3rd and 4th points I gues :-\


Sorryzzzz to trouble u :-[ but for stem cells found in the embroyo it goes through continous divisions to maybe form a single blood cell which then cells divide to form range of blood cells until it loses its ability to further divide right ??? 
   

guys.... some help wuld be nice! >:( ........  and does any one hve the jan 2010 6B102 and 6B107
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 23, 2010, 11:28:46 am
guys.... some help wuld be nice! >:( ........  and does any one hve the jan 2010 6B102 and 6B107

im sorry...that seems like edexcel...no wonder it's not in my textbook :-\
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Metallicnak on April 23, 2010, 11:39:20 am
im sorry...that seems like edexcel...no wonder it's not in my textbook :-\


so all the edexcel bio guyz out there HELP! Plzzzz
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: zb on April 23, 2010, 02:01:40 pm
wa alikom il salam

the answer is D
         how come???? Mark scheme says moving downwards and decelerating? The question is from jan 2010 unit 1 question 6 thanks
Title: help me please
Post by: dazzlingleon93 on April 23, 2010, 06:02:44 pm
hey this chemistry 2oo9 JAN 3B paper did anyone do it???please tell me hw to question 3(a) and 3d(ii ) and(iii) and (iv) (v) AND (VI) ALSO!!
so if anyone did it>>>>>>do post it up here>>>>i would really appreciate it



thankssssss
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 25, 2010, 07:35:27 pm
ok my bad...
that four kinda vanishes...ill do it agn..i must've made a mistake in a hurry
ill check

nid cud u plz show it again?????????
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 25, 2010, 08:02:41 pm
nid cud u plz show it again?????????

tom...i have to hurry to bed now..srry
tom definitely
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 27, 2010, 09:22:48 pm
more Que's in chem.
may02, P1 (CIE)
Q6,21,11
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on April 28, 2010, 03:16:19 am
just askin' whether if you guys knew where to get a
copy of 9701 As/A level Chemistry PastPapers book online
(the one with fully explained solution) preferably topic-by-topic.
Really wish to buy the book so it could aid me in my upcoming exams.

and By the way, i have chemistry pastpapers book actually,
but its a different syllabus code 9258 (Singapore's syllabus maybe)
n i thought that it would be an alien to CIE. does it do any good?

one more thing, guys, if u happens to have very useful chemistry revision
notes could u share them with me pleaaaase?

help me in here guys, will really appreciate it :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 28, 2010, 09:38:11 am
more Que's in chem.
may02, P1 (CIE)
Q6,21,11

Q6) P1V1+P2V2= P3V3
     he (1X2) + ne (2X1)= x X 3
     x= 4/3
     
A

What you do is take a V3= 3dm3 (1dm3 of he and 2 dm3 of ne..since they are connected)

Q11) C

It will keep increasing as more products are formed...later, reactants act as a limiting agent...
If you are wondering why the curve can't plateau out, it is because no more substrate has been added to keep the rate constant....as the conc of substrate falls, rate of reaction falls

Q21) You already had 6 as soon as you figure the formula...right?
        now when the haloalkane is either one of these C2H4Cl2 or C2H2Cl4 or C2H3Cl3, they could have isomers...
in C2H4Cl2  the Cl could be on each carbon or only on 1 carbon...2 possible structures
   C2H2Cl4  the Cl could be 2 on each carbon or 3 on 1 and 1 on the other
   C2H3Cl6  the Cl could be all 3 on one, or divide as 2 on 1 and 1 on the other
6+ the 3 possibilities = 9
C
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ~ A.F ~ on April 28, 2010, 09:45:04 am
Awesomeness Nid..

+rep. :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 28, 2010, 09:49:25 am
 :-[ :-[

Thank You  :)

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 28, 2010, 11:22:09 am
Thank You nid..
+rep
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 28, 2010, 11:37:27 am
Thank You nid..
+rep

ur welcome  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cashem'up on April 28, 2010, 01:19:01 pm
hey guys when determining the number of isomers a product has is there any mathemetical way to do so( excluding the sterioisomers.........that u have to figure out) but is it possible to do so for the structural isomers........i always have hunch there must be a way
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 28, 2010, 01:23:28 pm
There is using matices, but it will take you more time than if you simply find it out yourself and keep trying possibilities.

Hope that helps.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on April 28, 2010, 01:26:35 pm
The thing is it would be a different rule for different hydrocarbons, how many can you remember?
They won't ask you very complex stuff...the ones they give are usually easy to figure, just keep their structure in mind, and visualize the possibilities...always attempt these questions in the end, you get more time to draw and figure it out then
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on April 29, 2010, 11:27:12 am
hey does any1 no wat this means:
alpha particles have discreet energy values
beta have a continuous spectrum
(it ws an answer 2 a past paper question askin bout the diff between them)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on April 29, 2010, 12:03:45 pm
alpha particles act like particles, they only last for short periods of time. Beta particles, are less ionising and thus radiates more like waves.

This is a comparison between the two:

Composition and Charge:

Alpha particles are basically helium nuclei composed of two neutrons and two protons. The protons give alpha particles a positive charge. Beta particles are fast moving electrons and are negatively charged. Gamma rays are a form of energy that is part of the electromagnetic spectrum. They are neutral.

Speed and Penetration:

Alpha particles travel at about 1/20th the speed of light and can easily be blocked by paper. Beta particles travel almost at the speed of light and can be blocked by an aluminium sheet. Gamma rays travels at the speed of light and can only be blocked by a few centimetres of lead.

Deflection in a magnetic field:

Alpha particles are heavy and deflect very little in a magnetic field. Beta particles are lighter and have the greatest deflection in a magnetic field. Gamma rays are neutral and so do not undergo any deflection.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on April 29, 2010, 11:51:28 pm
Phy. help plz......

may09> Q18
Nov08. Q4
May08. Q31,22,16,14,12
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 03, 2010, 10:22:51 am
physics CIE paper 1
m/j 2006
15,12,17,22

o/n 2006
25, 27, 30,31,33,
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: T.Q on May 03, 2010, 09:34:14 pm
physics CIE paper 1
m/j 2006
15,12,17,22

o/n 2006
25, 27, 30,31,33,

m/j 2006

12. 4mX=3mv-2mv   speed = v/4   answer A

15. answer A  , 160=120+X    X=40  

17.  answer is D  , a=5 , 0=30^2 - 2x5xh

22. answer is B , area under graph = ( 0.5 x 0.01 x 500) + ( 0.02 x 500) +( 0.02 x 50 x 0.5)

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: T.Q on May 03, 2010, 09:54:40 pm
physics CIE paper 1
m/j 2006
15,12,17,22

o/n 2006
25, 27, 30,31,33,

o/n 2006

25. answer C , lamda=2pie,  1.5lamda=3pie

33. answer A , gradient=1/R 
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 04, 2010, 01:12:26 pm
Thank You  :) :) :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on May 05, 2010, 04:01:34 pm
i need some help with 5 (b) pls (question attached)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 05, 2010, 04:14:58 pm
subject?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on May 05, 2010, 04:29:52 pm
phys :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 05, 2010, 11:09:54 pm
chemistry doubt in equlibria:
in a question its given;
for an experiment to determine Kc 1.00 mol ethanoic acid 1 mol ethanol in the presence of 0.100 mol of H+ dissolved in 1 mol water.
where does the 0.100 mol H+ come in
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: moon on May 06, 2010, 02:11:42 am
please I need help in specimen 6BIO2 Q4c.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 06, 2010, 11:53:56 am
could anyone plz explain to me wat i have to know exactly in the potenital energy anf kinetic energy for AS level physics cie.
ijust dont get it.are there any rules for it???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 06, 2010, 12:58:02 pm
i need some help with 5 (b) pls (question attached)

I've answered this before...wait i'll get you the link
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: moon on May 06, 2010, 01:29:42 pm
please I need help in specimen 6BIO2 Q4c.
nobody studies edexcel except me here ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 06, 2010, 01:38:21 pm
i need some help with 5 (b) pls (question attached)

there is a formula u need to know

phase difference=( 2pi/ lamda)  X path difference

phase difference = pi [ for destructive interference]
lambda(wavelength) = 2pi/ pi  X path difference.
path difference is S2M - S1M 
find S2M using Pythagoras = root of 802 + 1002
                                                   =128
path difference= 128-100=28
wavelength= 2pi/pi X 28
               =56cm                 
At f= 1KHz wavelength= 0.33m/ 33cm
At f=4kHz   wavelength= 0..0825/8.25cm
wavelength changes from 33cm to 8.25cm
for minima...phase difference should be either one of them pi, 3pi,5pi,7pi [sub them in the eqn]
minima is observed when lambda= 56cm, 18.7cm, 11.2cm, 8cm
which are the 2 values between 33 and 8.25?? 18.7 and 11.2...so only 2 minimas
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Dr.Black Knight on May 06, 2010, 01:38:47 pm
nobody studies edexcel except me here ??? ???
I too do edexcel
Does anyone have the core practicals for bio 1 and 2 I'm doing the alternative to practicals!!1
And for phy6!!!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on May 07, 2010, 08:32:13 am
thank u again nid404!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Freaked12 on May 07, 2010, 09:06:03 pm
October November 2008
Question 9
i did  part 1...subtracting the area of rectangle from the area of curve
but part 2, about the volume etc
and part 3
Pleaseeee
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Freaked12 on May 07, 2010, 09:06:41 pm
October November 2008
Question 9
i did  part 1...subtracting the area of rectangle from the area of curve
but part 2, about the volume etc
and part 3
Pleaseeee
Its pure maths paper 1
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on May 07, 2010, 09:49:29 pm
Will do it tomorrow. Have been away for 2 days becos of a disk I had to recover.. Just going through all the probs I have to answer
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Freaked12 on May 07, 2010, 10:19:10 pm
Will do it tomorrow. Have been away for 2 days becos of a disk I had to recover.. Just going through all the probs I have to answer

alright then
but if your a tutor,you could have done it in minutes.
pLease :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 08, 2010, 07:41:23 am
October November 2008
Question 9
i did  part 1...subtracting the area of rectangle from the area of curve
but part 2, about the volume etc
and part 3
Pleaseeee

The volume obtained when the shaded region is rotated through
360 ° about the x-axis is given by
Volume of revolution of the curve , y = 2 - Volume of revolution of the curve y=\sqrt{3x+1}

Now Volume of revolution of the curve y = 2 is given by
Volume of revolution= int^5_1\pi (2)^2dx
4\pi\int^1_0 dx
= 4\pi[1-0]=4\pi

Volume of revolution of the curve=y=\sqrt{3x+1}= \int^b_a \pi (f(x))^2 dx
therefore volume of revolution=\int^1_0 \pi (3x+1) dx
=\int^1_0 3\pi xdx + \int^1_0 \pi dx
=3\pi \int^1_0 x dx + \pi \int^1_0 dx
=3\pi [(x^2)/2] ^1_0+\pi [(x)]^1_0
=3\pi [1/2-0] + \pi [1-0]
= 1.5\pi + \pi=2.5\pi

Volume of the shaded region= 4\pi - 2.5\pi= 1.5\pi

Next answer up in a while
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 08, 2010, 08:11:00 am
lol....Now I finally know how to use the latex thingy...cool

ohk...check the pic to look how the tangents are

We next find the acute angle, between the two tangents.

The equation of the curve is y= \sqrt (3x+1)

  i.e y= (3x+1)^(1/2)

differentiating with respect to x
dy/dx= 1/2 (3x+1)^(-1/2) (3)

so dy/dx= 3/2 [1/ \sqrt(3x+1)]

we know dy/dx= tan\theta

Gradient of tangent at P

dy/dx= dy/dx| (0,1)= 3/2[ 1/\sqrt(3(0) +1)]=3/2

If the angle made by the tangent with the +ve direction of x axis is \theta 1  then  
tan\theta1=1.5
\theta1=56.3099

Gradient of tangent at Q is given by
dy/dx|q= dy/dx|(1,2)= 3/2[ 1/\sqrt(3(1)+1)]=3/4
If the angle made by the tangent with the +ve direction of x axis is \theta 2   then
tan\theta 2=0.75
\theta 2= 36.8699


Let the tangent to the curve at point P intersect the x axis at point S and the tangent at point Q intersect the x axis at the point T.
Let the two tangents intersect at the point R.
Consider \delta RST

In \delta RST\angle S=180^o - \theta1, \angle T= \theta 2

Now \angle R + \angle S + \angle T =180^o
so \angle R= 180^o - \angle S - \angle T
i.e \angle R= 180^o - (180^o - \theta1)- \theta 2 = \theta 1 - \theta 2
so angle between the tangents = \theta 1- \theta 2
                                           == 56.3099° – 36.8699° = 19.44°

I feel so good to help....that satisfaction  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Freaked12 on May 08, 2010, 06:49:28 pm
The volume obtained when the shaded region is rotated through
360 ° about the x-axis is given by
Volume of revolution of the curve , y = 2 - Volume of revolution of the curve y=\sqrt{3x+1}

Now Volume of revolution of the curve y = 2 is given by
Volume of revolution= int^5_1\pi (2)^2dx
4\pi\int^1_0 dx
= 4\pi[1-0]=4\pi

Volume of revolution of the curve=y=\sqrt{3x+1}= \int^b_a \pi (f(x))^2 dx
therefore volume of revolution=\int^1_0 \pi (3x+1) dx
=\int^1_0 3\pi xdx + \int^1_0 \pi dx
=3\pi \int^1_0 x dx + \pi \int^1_0 dx
=3\pi [(x^2)/2] ^1_0+\pi [(x)]^1_0
=3\pi [1/2-0] + \pi [1-0]
= 1.5\pi + \pi=2.5\pi

Volume of the shaded region= 4\pi - 2.5\pi= 1.5\pi

Next answer up in a while

you just saved me 150 riyal i was about to pay to a tutor
God bless
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 08, 2010, 06:53:10 pm
That's all I need. God's blessings. Pray for me :)

Good luck  ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 08, 2010, 09:14:13 pm
lol....Now I finally know how to use the latex thingy...cool

ohk...check the pic to look how the tangents are

We next find the acute angle, between the two tangents.

The equation of the curve is y= \sqrt (3x+1)

  i.e y= (3x+1)^(1/2)

differentiating with respect to x
dy/dx= 1/2 (3x+1)^(-1/2) (3)

so dy/dx= 3/2 [1/ \sqrt(3x+1)]

we know dy/dx= tan\theta

Gradient of tangent at P

dy/dx= dy/dx| (0,1)= 3/2[ 1/\sqrt(3(0) +1)]=3/2

If the angle made by the tangent with the +ve direction of x axis is \theta 1  then  
tan\theta1=1.5
\theta1=56.3099

Gradient of tangent at Q is given by
dy/dx|q= dy/dx|(1,2)= 3/2[ 1/\sqrt(3(1)+1)]=3/4
If the angle made by the tangent with the +ve direction of x axis is \theta 2   then
tan\theta 2=0.75
\theta 2= 36.8699


Let the tangent to the curve at point P intersect the x axis at point S and the tangent at point Q intersect the x axis at the point T.
Let the two tangents intersect at the point R.
Consider \delta RST

In \delta RST\angle S=180^o - \theta1, \angle T= \theta 2

Now \angle R + \angle S + \angle T =180^o
so \angle R= 180^o - \angle S - \angle T
i.e \angle R= 180^o - (180^o - \theta1)- \theta 2 = \theta 1 - \theta 2
so angle between the tangents = \theta 1- \theta 2
                                           == 56.3099° – 36.8699° = 19.44°

I feel so good to help....that satisfaction  :)

this is C2??
P.S nid ure awesome ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 09, 2010, 07:23:13 am
This is P1  :)

why thank you :)

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 10, 2010, 11:58:42 am
M/j 2006 paper 2 CIE chemistry
4 f (ii)
ally alcohol CH2=CHCH2OH
heated under reflux with acidified MnO4 -
according to the Ms the product is HO2CCO2H
what about the CH2OH part?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 10, 2010, 01:57:35 pm
that is what gets converted to CO2H

the extreme left Carbon forms CO2 and the middle one forms CO2H.

Gettin it
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ny on May 10, 2010, 03:51:29 pm
hello.i have this vector question for P1.
actually it was my mock exam question.

the question is:
the points A and B are such that the unit vector in the direction AB(from A to B) is 1/3i + pj +2/3k , where p is a negative constant.

i) find the value of p

then, the position vectors of A and B, relative to an origin O, are 9i +2j +qk and 12i -4j -5k respectively.

ii) find the value of q

thats all.thank you soo much.please reply asap..
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 10, 2010, 10:31:48 pm
Posted by: nid404
Insert Quote
that is what gets converted to CO2H

the extreme left Carbon forms CO2 and the middle one forms CO2H.

Gettin it

sort of yes.but why does it form CO2?

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 11, 2010, 04:39:00 am
That's a rule dear. Reaction with hot conc KMNO4 gives CO2, water, and acid. In this case dicarboxylic acid since there is also  an OH group.

You need to learn a few organic stuff the way it comes. Why? maybe in A2  :-\  I always ask questions like these. It's good to..but teachers don't like it :-\
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on May 11, 2010, 04:41:52 am
That's a rule dear. Reaction with hot conc KMNO4 gives CO2, water, and acid. In this case dicarboxylic acid since there is also  an OH group.

You need to learn a few organic stuff the way it comes. Why? maybe in A2  :-\  I always ask questions like these. It's good to..but teachers don't like it :-\

My sister often comes to me, why does acid + metal carbonate form salt +water + CO2. And I'm like, cuz it simply does, I can explain, but believe me, that wont make her happy. She will want to know more, and then get completely confused abt it!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Summer :] on May 11, 2010, 04:48:06 am
My sister often comes to me, why does acid + metal carbonate form salt +water + CO2. And I'm like, cuz it simply does, I can explain, but believe me, that wont make her happy. She will want to know more, and then get completely confused abt it!

Haha thats exactly how my sister thinks! and when she asks me further questions, she confuses me along with her
so thats i basically avoid her questions! or else ill get a U in chemistry
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 11, 2010, 04:50:39 am
And I appreciate people who think like that. I always look for an explanation to things. I am very disappointed when I don't get my answer. I try every possible thing to find out. Use the net, look through books, ask people...

Maybe there's still some time before you know the "why" and "how"
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Summer :] on May 11, 2010, 06:13:23 am
And I appreciate people who think like that. I always look for an explanation to things. I am very disappointed when I don't get my answer. I try every possible thing to find out. Use the net, look through books, ask people...

Maybe there's still some time before you know the "why" and "how"

that's true, i always think why does it happen as well..but at times it's best to avoid this question or else you'll be doomed like my sister.
sometimes there's the answer but its not required for our level of education, you'll learn it later in higher levels (thats what my teacher says  ::) )
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 11, 2010, 06:14:58 am
Hahaha....ditto...exactly what my teachers say...sometimes I wonder whether they know it or not
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 11, 2010, 11:38:50 am
That's a rule dear. Reaction with hot conc KMNO4 gives CO2, water, and acid. In this case dicarboxylic acid since there is also  an OH group.

You need to learn a few organic stuff the way it comes. Why? maybe in A2  :-\  I always ask questions like these. It's good to..but teachers don't like it :-\
lol. Thank You :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cashem'up on May 11, 2010, 01:45:44 pm
And I appreciate people who think like that. I always look for an explanation to things. I am very disappointed when I don't get my answer. I try every possible thing to find out. Use the net, look through books, ask people...

Maybe there's still some time before you know the "why" and "how"

haha ;D ;D ;D totally agree so many ppl feel the same thing here....me too ...... u go to the teachers and ask dem WHY bcos u want to know wats the reason........the other day i still rememebr iasked my bio teacher how does the nucleus respond to detection of antigens on cell surface membrane.....she was like it happens... and i continued askin her like does the message reach automatically how does it instigate the nucleus(this sounds stupid... :P but realy i like to understand things rather than muggin it up.....lol ) 
 ;D ;D ;D

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cashem'up on May 11, 2010, 01:49:38 pm
Posted by: nid404
Insert Quote
that is what gets converted to CO2H

the extreme left Carbon forms CO2 and the middle one forms CO2H.

Gettin it

sort of yes.but why does it form CO2?



i can give u slight  more clarity on how it happens..... see basically the double bond breaks.... now mn04 is an oxidising agent so the CH2 is oxidised to CO2 now
for the right part if the carbon in compound is primary a COOH will form on full oxidation and aldehyde on partial
whereas if C is secondary ketone will form

hope it helped..... ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 11, 2010, 05:59:58 pm
yes definitely.
Thanks a lot :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 11, 2010, 06:01:40 pm
Bio related question.
in an experiment to find the effect of temperature on rate of breakdown of H2O2 by catalase.
what can we take as the control?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cashem'up on May 11, 2010, 08:28:54 pm
yes definitely.
Thanks a lot :)

u welcome.... ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cashem'up on May 11, 2010, 08:33:58 pm
Bio related question.
in an experiment to find the effect of temperature on rate of breakdown of H2O2 by catalase.
what can we take as the control?

 i am not sure but u could boil the catalase and then use it to prove that breakdown is ocuring due to catalase and not any other factors...........
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: pjb13 on May 12, 2010, 03:10:07 am
Economics:

What is GDP/output gap...the diff between potential GDP and nominal or real GDP?

Need help abt the characteristics of the following regarding ....normal/abnormal profits in the short or long term, where does equilibrium occur on the graph in short term/long term, the position on the graph where profit maximization occurs if it does(MC=MR etc), when is it necessary to make a normal profit (in short/long run) :

1)Monopoly
2)Mono Competition
3)Perfect Competition
4)Oligopoly
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Summer :] on May 12, 2010, 05:37:46 pm
Hahaha....ditto...exactly what my teachers say...sometimes I wonder whether they know it or not

i bet they dont :p (hi 5)! haha
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Summer :] on May 12, 2010, 05:38:31 pm
Bio related question.
in an experiment to find the effect of temperature on rate of breakdown of H2O2 by catalase.
what can we take as the control?

control group is at room temperature 25 degrees celsius :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 12, 2010, 07:39:24 pm
physics cie 2009 nov
p1

Q6
Q14
Q21
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 13, 2010, 08:55:08 am
physics cie 2009 nov
p1

Q6
Q14
Q21


can anyone solve this???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on May 13, 2010, 11:22:25 am
2 mins
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on May 13, 2010, 11:31:25 am
6B. Graph is upside down
14.A
horizontal component at start=vertical component=v/sqrt2)
at top of flight vertical component of velocity is zero, so velocity=v/sqrt(2)
1/2m(v/sqrt2))^=1/2(1/2mv^2)
21.C energy=area under graph just a bit more than1/2*100*2*10^-3 ie 0.11
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on May 13, 2010, 06:17:18 pm
control group is at room temperature 25 degrees celsius :)

thnkx :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 13, 2010, 07:09:41 pm
physics cie paper 1 AS
june 2005 Q22
nov 2008 Q24
VERY URGENT
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 14, 2010, 09:05:27 am
physics cie paper 1 AS
june 2005 Q22
nov 2008 Q24
VERY URGENT

someone solve this plzzzzzzzzzz
with details
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: melony on May 14, 2010, 10:43:47 am
Quote
physics cie paper 1 AS
june 2005 Q22
nov 2008 Q24
VERY URGENT

As well as that please cud sum1 help me.. how do u determine the direction of the resultant of three coplanar forces. i.e mechanics paper 04/m/j/05 ???

thank yu!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Sue T on May 14, 2010, 02:03:17 pm
in cie phys it says (the subject content) 'use a c.r.o'
i havent done ny practical in school usin a c.r.o!
and also 'use calibration curves'
ny1 nos how 2 use both of them?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on May 16, 2010, 01:01:13 am
need help & explanations on cie physics O/N paper 11
q 4, 9, 13, 15, 16, 22
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: vanibharutham on May 16, 2010, 09:06:51 pm
would be nice to know the year number :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: pjb13 on May 21, 2010, 09:01:33 pm
For Business unit 2 do I need to know abt Elton Mayo ( motivation theory)?? Cuz its there in my book but havent seen it in papers.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 27, 2010, 04:18:07 pm
guys plzz help
cie physics AS
nov 2001 p2
Q3c
could someone draw the arrows for me i want to check :)
thxx much!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 27, 2010, 05:06:12 pm
yup check the attachment

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 27, 2010, 05:13:29 pm
yup check the attachment



hey nid thankyou ;D
but i got the "R" wrong could u plzz explain why its in such a direction :)
thx
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 27, 2010, 05:15:59 pm
hmm....well...it's reaction force...think abt mechanics now..lol...when u have a slope...and something is placed on it...visualize it's normal contact force...hope that helps
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 27, 2010, 05:23:43 pm
hmm....well...it's reaction force...think abt mechanics now..lol...when u have a slope...and something is placed on it...visualize it's normal contact force...hope that helps

thx ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 28, 2010, 10:30:29 am
phyiscs cie AS
nov 2009 p2
Q3Cii
why do we use the vertical component of velocity when we calculate momentum here why not the horizontal component??
 
Q4cii
part 2
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 11:44:55 am
it's falling vertically down...so you use the vertical component


x when weight is F+3.8N =17.8-14.2=3.6cm=0.036m
x when weight is 3.8N=16.3-14.2=2.1cm=0.021m
2 epe= 1/2 kx2 = 1/2 X 1.8 X 10^-2 X (change in x2)
                                    =1/2 X 1.8 X10^-2 X (0.0362-0.0212)
                                    =0.077 J
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on May 28, 2010, 12:18:56 pm
A lamp is supported in equilibrium by 2 chains fixed to 2 points A and B at the same level.

i) The lengths of the chain are 0.3m and 0.4m and the distance between A and B is 0.5m. Given the tension in the longer chain is 36N, by resolving horizontally , find the tension in the shorter chain.

ii) By resolving vertically , find the mass of the lamp.

Please explain with A DIAGRAM!, thanks a lot! :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 28, 2010, 12:29:02 pm
it's falling vertically down...so you use the vertical component


x when weight is F+3.8N =17.8-14.2=3.6cm=0.036m
x when weight is 3.8N=16.3-14.2=2.1cm=0.021m
2 epe= 1/2 kx2 = 1/2 X 1.8 X 10^-2 X (change in x2)
                                    =1/2 X 1.8 X10^-2 X (0.0362-0.0212)
                                    =0.077 J


the answer am getting is 0.00000769
and for the extension why arent we taking only this extension:
x when weight is 3.8N=16.3-14.2=2.1cm=0.021m
as this is wat they only asked for...
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 12:36:02 pm
Yup so here you go.

You the the angle between the two chains is 90. 0.32+ 0.42= 0.52  yup?

now find angles a and b

tan a= 0.4/0.3=53.13
b= 180-90-53.13=36.87

now sina/36 = sinb/ T is the shorter chain

T=27N in the shorter chain

Now resolving forces vertically

36sin36.87+27sin53.13= mg
0.6X36+ 0.8X27=mg
mg=45
m=4.5 kg

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 12:43:19 pm
the answer am getting is 0.00000769
and for the extension why arent we taking only this extension:
x when weight is 3.8N=16.3-14.2=2.1cm=0.021m
as this is wat they only asked for...


It says For the extension of the spring from a length of 16.3 cm to a length of 17.8 cm ... :-\
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on May 28, 2010, 12:48:41 pm
Yup so here you go.

You the the angle between the two chains is 90. 0.32+ 0.42= 0.52  yup?

now find angles a and b

tan a= 0.4/0.3=53.13
b= 180-90-53.13=36.87

now sina/36 = sinb/ T is the shorter chain

T=27N in the shorter chain

Now resolving forces vertically

36sin36.87+27sin53.13= mg
0.6X36+ 0.8X27=mg
mg=45
m=4.5 kg



ok sry, i didnt put the q rite, it says by resolving horizontally show that the T in the shorter chain is 48N! not 27N

plus, the mass is 6kg :-/
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 12:56:23 pm
ok sry, i didnt put the q rite, it says by resolving horizontally show that the T in the shorter chain is 48N! not 27N

plus, the mass is 6kg :-/

ok then...refer to the same diagram

a=53.13
b=36.87

now 36cos36.87=Tcos53.13
T=48 N

now resolve vertically
36sin36.87+48sin53.13=mg
  21.6    +38.4=mg
60=mg
m=6kg
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on May 28, 2010, 12:57:37 pm
Okay, i tried that and i got it. But what puzzles me is the previous method u used, that is also a correct way to find the force rite?

F = 27N ?

By the way, thanks for the other answers..! :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 12:58:44 pm
Okay, i tried that and i got it. But what puzzles me is the previous method u used, that is also a correct way to find the force rite?

F = 27N ?

By the way, thanks for the other answers..! :)

I am wondering...cause i used something similar in another question like this is the book...and got the right ans....I must check tho  :-\

You're welcome  ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on May 28, 2010, 02:34:32 pm
guys juz a short question on chemistry AS,
how do you arrange atoms/groups in an optical isomerism
for e.g (i) CH3COCOOH (ii) H3C-CBr(COOH)-CH2Br

if you could xplain in diagram it will be very much appreciated ^^
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 28, 2010, 02:52:51 pm
Optical isomer are possible only in compounds containing a chiral carbon

So it's not possible in the first one.

Here's how the second one would look
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on May 29, 2010, 07:40:45 am
Optical isomer are possible only in compounds containing a chiral carbon

So it's not possible in the first one.

Here's how the second one would look

nid is there a step/rule on arranging the atoms/groups? whether CH3- group or something else
should be on top the chiral Carbon atom [im taking the second problem H3C-CBr(COOH)-CH2Br as e.g ]

most of my answers for the question of this type does not seem to be similar to the Marking Scheme.
They put something different on top or at any other place. If i don't get the same arrangement as MS
will i be losing marks? :S
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 29, 2010, 07:48:47 am
nid is there a step/rule on arranging the atoms/groups? whether CH3- group or something else
should be on top the chiral Carbon atom [im taking the second problem H3C-CBr(COOH)-CH2Br as e.g ]

most of my answers for the question of this type does not seem to be similar to the Marking Scheme.
They put something different on top or at any other place. If i don't get the same arrangement as MS
will i be losing marks? :S

I'm really not getting you :/ Rule in arranging? You simply reflect the compound...like you reflect something in a mirror.

the arrangement doesn't matter in this particular case...just that COOH and Br are side chains.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: The SMA on May 29, 2010, 08:00:03 am
oh okay. thanks nid! ^^
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 29, 2010, 05:35:04 pm
physics cie AS
p2 june 2009
variant 1
Q2c, d
for 'c" shouldnt it be -1.6 ???
and for "d"......wats the formula for speed of separation and speed of approach? and do we take the signs into account?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 29, 2010, 07:01:26 pm
Please post the question paper here halosh :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 29, 2010, 08:02:53 pm
Please post the question paper here halosh :)

sure
and could u do these as well plz same paper:
3bi .....why is the angle 90 ?
5b
7aii,7aiii

2nd variant:
Q7a
thankyouuuuuuu
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 29, 2010, 08:55:30 pm
physics cie AS
p2 june 2009
variant 1
Q2c, d
for 'c" shouldnt it be -1.6 ???
and for "d"......wats the formula for speed of separation and speed of approach? and do we take the signs into account?

c) it will move in the initial direction, which is positive! u see, the MAGNITUDE of force is the same in both, but the direction of force and impulse varies.

d) equation is: u1 - u2 = v2 - v1 = -(v1 -v2  )and yes you do take signs into account
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 29, 2010, 09:10:29 pm
c) it will move in the initial direction, which is positive! u see, the MAGNITUDE of force is the same in both, but the direction of force and impulse varies.

d) equation is: u1 - u2 = v2 - v1 = -(v1 -v2  )and yes you do take signs into account

thankyou ;D
and could u plz solve the rest?
 :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 30, 2010, 05:59:15 am
sure
and could u do these as well plz same paper:
3bi .....why is the angle 90 ?
5b
7aii,7aiii

3) b) max value of the function cosx is 1
cos 90=1

max turning effect when theta=90  :)

5b) there is a formula u need to know

phase difference=( 2pi/ lamda)  X path difference

phase difference = pi [ for destructive interference]
lambda(wavelength) = 2pi/ pi  X path difference.
path difference is S2M - S1M 
find S2M using Pythagoras = root of 802 + 1002
                                                   =128
path difference= 128-100=28
wavelength= 2pi/pi X 28
               =56cm                 
At f= 1KHz wavelength= 0.33m/ 33cm
At f=4kHz   wavelength= 0..0825/8.25cm
wavelength changes from 33cm to 8.25cm
for minima...phase difference should be either one of them pi, 3pi,5pi,7pi [sub them in the eqn]
minima is observed when lambda= 56cm, 18.7cm, 11.2cm, 8cm
which are the 2 values between 33 and 8.25?? 18.7 and 11.2...so only 2 minimas

7)a)
ii) R between BX implies combined resistance of two parallel resistors in the loop BYCX = R/2
iii) AZ will be the combined resistance of all.
R in BY and CX are paralle...their combined value is R/2  this is in series with 2 more resistors.
So combined resistance = R/2 + 2R = 2.5R
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 08:07:40 am
3) b) max value of the function cosx is 1
cos 90=1

max turning effect when theta=90  :)

5b) there is a formula u need to know

phase difference=( 2pi/ lamda)  X path difference

phase difference = pi [ for destructive interference]
lambda(wavelength) = 2pi/ pi  X path difference.
path difference is S2M - S1M 
find S2M using Pythagoras = root of 802 + 1002
                                                   =128
path difference= 128-100=28
wavelength= 2pi/pi X 28
               =56cm                 
At f= 1KHz wavelength= 0.33m/ 33cm
At f=4kHz   wavelength= 0..0825/8.25cm
wavelength changes from 33cm to 8.25cm
for minima...phase difference should be either one of them pi, 3pi,5pi,7pi [sub them in the eqn]
minima is observed when lambda= 56cm, 18.7cm, 11.2cm, 8cm
which are the 2 values between 33 and 8.25?? 18.7 and 11.2...so only 2 minimas

7)a)
ii) R between BX implies combined resistance of two parallel resistors in the loop BYCX = R/2
iii) AZ will be the combined resistance of all.
R in BY and CX are paralle...their combined value is R/2  this is in series with 2 more resistors.
So combined resistance = R/2 + 2R = 2.5R

thankyou so much !!! but for the 5b........wat do we do if its constructive interference? and when do we exactly use that formula u gave, when we have to combine phase difference and path difference??
thxxx
and could u do the 2nd variant of the paper:
Q7a (with details) thxxxx alooot
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 30, 2010, 08:11:23 am
thankyou so much !!! but for the 5b........wat do we do if its constructive interference? and when do we exactly use that formula u gave, when we have to combine phase difference and path difference??
thxxx
and could u do the 2nd variant of the paper:
Q7a (with details) thxxxx alooot

when it's constructive interference phase difference would be 0/2pi/4pi...etc.
We use the formula when you are given 2 of the values either lambda,path or phase difference and asked to find the other.

yup hold on for a while  ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 30, 2010, 08:20:59 am
2nd variant:
Q7a
thankyouuuuuuu

7) a

Both are open. No current flows. so max resistance. R=\infinity  R=V/I I=0 anything divided by zero is not defined actually but ms says infinity...so we stick to that
S1 open S2 closed. Current will pass only through the wire with S2. So resistance will be 2R (cause there are 2 resistors in series)
When both are close. R= combines resistance of 2R in parallel with each other...so combined resistance is R
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 08:25:49 am
7) a

Both are open. No current flows. so max resistance. R=\infinity  R=V/I I=0 anything divided by zero is not defined actually but ms says infinity...so we stick to that
S1 open S2 closed. Current will pass only through the wire with S2. So resistance will be 2R (cause there are 2 resistors in series)
When both are close. R= combines resistance of 2R in parallel with each other...so combined resistance is R

thankyou *bows* ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 30, 2010, 08:26:34 am
thankyou *bows* ;D ;D ;D

lol..not a problem :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 09:07:19 am
same paper 2nd variant
Q2c
isnt change in momentum= m(v-u)
so isnt it supposed to be = 0.78(-9-4.2)
= -10.3 ??????????????
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 01:22:44 pm
same paper 2nd variant
Q2c
isnt change in momentum= m(v-u)
so isnt it supposed to be = 0.78(-9-4.2)
= -10.3 ??????????????

could someone do this ? :S
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 06:13:38 pm
june 2008
Q2bi
isnt the answer 1:3
???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cooldude on May 30, 2010, 06:33:44 pm
june 2008
Q2bi
isnt the answer 1:3
???

maths, phy?, c1, c2, m1?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 07:04:47 pm
maths, phy?, c1, c2, m1?
sorry  ;D
physics cie
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 30, 2010, 07:09:31 pm
june 2008
Q2bi
isnt the answer 1:3
???
please post the q paper
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 07:16:04 pm
please post the q paper
and Q4c as well
thx
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 30, 2010, 07:33:34 pm
first thing in the morning..promise
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 30, 2010, 07:56:10 pm
sure A.F np.
june 2008 Q6b physics
with explanation plzzzzz
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 30, 2010, 08:20:22 pm
First thing in the morning  ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 08:36:21 am
could anyone solve this?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 10:48:51 am
could anyone solve this?

His morning = noon. Wake up A.F :P

I'll do it for ya :) Gimme 5 min  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 10:52:50 am
can i ask sth? freeexampapers.com << this website is not opened how can i visit  there. help pls :(
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 10:54:03 am
june 2008
Q2bi
isnt the answer 1:3
???

Initial momentum=0 so final momentum will also be equal to 0

2400XV-800v=0

opp directions.

2400V=800v
v/V=2400/800
v/V=3

Hope you got that now :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 10:55:02 am
can i ask sth? freeexampapers.com << this website is not opened how can i visit  there. help pls :(

not opening? it's working fine here. If this doesn't work try xtremepapers.net 
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 10:57:58 am
not opening? it's working fine here. If this doesn't work try xtremepapers.net 

ok. it helped a lot ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 10:58:55 am
and Q4c as well
thx

Now we know p=hdg

1.01 × 105 = h × 1.08 × 103 × 9.81

h=9.53m

they say it is assumed to be 10m

so % error= 10-9.53/10 X 100 = 4.7%
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Nobody on May 31, 2010, 10:59:04 am
can i ask sth? freeexampapers.com << this website is not opened how can i visit  there. help pls :(

no, don't use xtremepapers.net! i think it contains viruses.
Tell me what paper you want, I'll upload it here. :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:02:20 am
no, don't use xtremepapers.net! i think it contains viruses.
Tell me what paper you want, I'll upload it here. :)

hmm math additional paper 2 june. (2006-2007-2008-2009). i need these :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:15:23 am
no, don't use xtremepapers.net! i think it contains viruses.
Tell me what paper you want, I'll upload it here. :)

omg i believe i said wrong thing. im taking extended level. im so sorry for telling u the wrong papers :(
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:16:19 am
So please clarify which papers you want :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:18:19 am
So please clarify which papers you want :)
hey dont humiliate me :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:19:28 am
hey dont humiliate me :P

lol im not :P ill get you the papers...just be clear which one you want  :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:22:02 am
lol im not :P ill get you the papers...just be clear which one you want  :P

im really sorry my stupid friend made a comment insteead of me. the first one i want u to dowload was true. i want additional papers if u dont mind :) :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:22:46 am
im really sorry my stupid friend made a comment insteead of me. the first one i want u to dowload was true. i want additional papers if u dont mind :) :)

haha...nvm :P

Gimme 5 min  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:23:37 am
haha...nvm :P

Gimme 5 min  :)
waiting 4 u ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:26:30 am
rest comin up in while  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:32:51 am
Here u go
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Deniz on May 31, 2010, 11:35:35 am
Here u go

thx !!  8)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 11:45:26 am
my pleasure  :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Nobody on May 31, 2010, 12:19:31 pm
my pleasure  :)

oh! nid... you always snatch my job! ;)
and Deniz, if you want other papers, post it in paper requests. :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 12:26:10 pm
His morning = noon. Wake up A.F :P

Bleh :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 12:29:32 pm
Bleh :P

haww  :(
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 12:36:37 pm
haww  :(

Shorry.ok..umm..sorry :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 12:38:02 pm
Shorry.ok..umm..sorry :P

wtv :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 12:42:33 pm
wtv :P

haaaaaaww :( :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 12:46:04 pm
haaaaaaww :( :P

we can't do this here...so shush  :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 01:07:11 pm
Initial momentum=0 so final momentum will also be equal to 0

2400XV-800v=0

opp directions.

2400V=800v
v/V=2400/800
v/V=3

Hope you got that now :)

hey nid i rili dont get this if it is v/V shouldnt it be 800/2400 ??
thx ;)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 01:10:07 pm
hey nid i rili dont get this if it is v/V shouldnt it be 800/2400 ??
thx ;)

ohkay wait

2400V-800v=0

2400V=800v

2400V/800=v
3V=v
3=v/V

does this help?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on May 31, 2010, 01:11:09 pm
Barge of m=4000Kg , pulled in a straight line by two boats with an acceleration of 0.6m/s^2.
The tension in one towrope is 1800N and in the other is 1650N. Given that the angles the reopes make with the direction of the motion are 20 degree and x degree respectively, find the value of x and Resistance to motion .

Answer --> As the angle is inversely proportional to the force, i used the inverse proportion concept to find the
                x-angle. like this

               1800 -> 20
               1650 --> x

 x = (20*1800)/1650 = 21.9 degrees (correct answer)

i used this x value to calculate the resistance and i got the correct answer.

---------------MY DOUBT----------------------------

i was wondering , is there any other way to find the x angle?

PS : Diagram attached.

Correct me if im wrong.

thank you.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 01:11:58 pm
ohkay wait

2400V-800v=0

2400V=800v

2400V/800=v
3V=v
3=v/V

does this help?

YES ALOOT
thx a bunch  ;D ;D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 01:17:05 pm
sure A.F np.
june 2008 Q6b physics
with explanation plzzzzz

could u do this as well ?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 01:19:51 pm
Barge of m=4000Kg , pulled in a straight line by two boats with an acceleration of 0.6m/s^2.
The tension in one towrope is 1800N and in the other is 1650N. Given that the angles the reopes make with the direction of the motion are 20 degree and x degree respectively, find the value of x and Resistance to motion .

Answer --> As the angle is inversely proportional to the force, i used the inverse proportion concept to find the
                x-angle. like this

               1800 -> 20
               1650 --> x

 x = (20*1800)/1650 = 21.9 degrees (correct answer)

i used this x value to calculate the resistance and i got the correct answer.

---------------MY DOUBT----------------------------

i was wondering , is there any other way to find the x angle?

PS : Diagram attached.

Correct me if im wrong.

thank you.

Yes aadi ...what you've done is not ideally the correct way.

Resolve the forces vertically. There is no vertical motion...so no resultant vertical force

1650 sinx= 1800sin20



Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 01:21:46 pm
could u do this as well ?

yup :)

I've explained this a lot many times before :P It's long stuff...ill look for it :P
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on May 31, 2010, 01:23:24 pm
here


1) When S1 is open, the circuit is not a closed one and hence not functional. Power will thus be 0
2) When only S3 is open, Current flows through A and wire with S2...power of each heating element is given as 1.5kW(stated in the question)...so in this case it is that of A. Current doesn't flow through B because it offers more resistance than wire with S2.
3)when all switches r closed...No current flows through B. You must know that any charge will take the path with least resistance....
So when S2 is closed, current flows through the wire with S2 since it offers a lesser resistance in comparison with wire with heating element B. So Power would be that of A nd C= 1.5+1.5=3kW
4)When only S1 is closed, Current flows through A and B...combined Resistance is 76.8ohms...I=3.125A..P=I2R =0.75kW
5)When only S2 is open, current flows through all the heating elements A, B and C.
A and B in series= 76.8ohms
With C in parallel
So combined R
1/R= 1/76.8+1/38.4
R=25.6
I=240/25.6=9.375
P=9.3752X25.6=2.25kW
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 01:38:28 pm
here


1) When S1 is open, the circuit is not a closed one and hence not functional. Power will thus be 0
2) When only S3 is open, Current flows through A and wire with S2...power of each heating element is given as 1.5kW(stated in the question)...so in this case it is that of A. Current doesn't flow through B because it offers more resistance than wire with S2.
3)when all switches r closed...No current flows through B. You must know that any charge will take the path with least resistance....
So when S2 is closed, current flows through the wire with S2 since it offers a lesser resistance in comparison with wire with heating element B. So Power would be that of A nd C= 1.5+1.5=3kW
4)When only S1 is closed, Current flows through A and B...combined Resistance is 76.8ohms...I=3.125A..P=I2R =0.75kW
5)When only S2 is open, current flows through all the heating elements A, B and C.
A and B in series= 76.8ohms
With C in parallel
So combined R
1/R= 1/76.8+1/38.4
R=25.6
I=240/25.6=9.375
P=9.3752X25.6=2.25kW

thankyou :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 03:01:55 pm
nov 2007 physics p2 cie
Q2dii
dont we have to subtract the forces? not add them?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 03:19:12 pm
No..you add them

f=force of boy, R=resultant, F=friction

therefore: f-F=R

f=F+R

got it?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 03:38:29 pm
No..you add them

f=force of boy, R=resultant, F=friction

therefore: f-F=R

f=F+R

got it?

not rili , dont we have to find the resultant in this case..i mean friction is 23 and the force of boy is 75 ..??
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 03:54:21 pm
Dont think of numbers

First:

resultant force= force by kid-friction

is that clear?

now add the resultant (mass x acceleration) to friction
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 03:58:54 pm
Dont think of numbers

First:

resultant force= force by kid-friction

is that clear?

now add the resultant (mass x acceleration) to friction

YEPP :D
THANXXX
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Meticulous on May 31, 2010, 04:02:09 pm
Any time :)

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on May 31, 2010, 05:26:01 pm
nov 2007 physics
Q4d
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on May 31, 2010, 07:44:22 pm
Yes aadi ...what you've done is not ideally the correct way.

Resolve the forces vertically. There is no vertical motion...so no resultant vertical force

1650 sinx= 1800sin20





wudnt u add the weight of the barge too to the downward force??

1650sinx + 40,000 = 1800sin20??
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: halosh92 on June 01, 2010, 08:41:36 am
nov 2007 physics
Q4d

could someone solve this!!!!!! ??? ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cooldude on June 01, 2010, 08:55:47 am
wudnt u add the weight of the barge too to the downward force??

1650sinx + 40,000 = 1800sin20??

nope, nid's rite, cuz she has considered the forces acting on the barge, while the weight is the force of the gravity acting on the barge, the weight is balanced by the buoyance force acting on the barge by the water (obviously the boat and the barge will be in water :P ), just think as though the boat and the barge was on the ground, the normal force wud balance the weight of the barge and in this case the buoyance force does that
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on June 01, 2010, 10:06:26 am
nope, nid's rite, cuz she has considered the forces acting on the barge, while the weight is the force of the gravity acting on the barge, the weight is balanced by the buoyance force acting on the barge by the water (obviously the boat and the barge will be in water :P ), just think as though the boat and the barge was on the ground, the normal force wud balance the weight of the barge and in this case the buoyance force does that

ok but many questions, like question 6...(same ex. 4A, q6) ...v had to take the weight into consideration!

is it something like, v dont consider the weight, wen two forces are acting on the object in the same direction.?? like here, two tugboats so no weight, but in q6...there are again 2 forces...push and pull...so while calculating the Normal contact force..y do we take the weight too??



Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: cooldude on June 01, 2010, 05:55:31 pm
ok but many questions, like question 6...(same ex. 4A, q6) ...v had to take the weight into consideration!

is it something like, v dont consider the weight, wen two forces are acting on the object in the same direction.?? like here, two tugboats so no weight, but in q6...there are again 2 forces...push and pull...so while calculating the Normal contact force..y do we take the weight too??





yeah we gotta consider the weight in this, as the q is to find the normal force, thus we assume that the weight is not balanced by the component of the tension acting upwards, however in the q u asked previously we have to consider the weight and the buoyance force equal as the q has not been asked to consider the normal force.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on June 02, 2010, 10:43:06 pm
i need help in chem. ppr1( CIE)
May07
Q26, 28
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 03, 2010, 05:57:09 am
i need help in chem. ppr1( CIE)
May07
Q26, 28

26) You really have to draw and check. The OH should be tertiary(since it doesn't react with MnO4)  Try making alcohols with the 5,6,7 and 8 carbons with a tertiary alcohol and a chiral carbon...

28) It has to be an aldehyde or a ketone to react with 2,4 DNP. so it's either B or C. Now to decolorise manganate ions, it has to form a carboxylic acid, which will happen only when an aldehyde is oxidised...so it's C.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: thecandydoll on June 04, 2010, 07:03:34 am
CIE AS CHEM PAPER 1.
Q5.
How do you get the answer explain?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 04, 2010, 10:49:10 am
CIE AS CHEM PAPER 1.
Q5.
How do you get the answer explain?

what year?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: thecandydoll on June 04, 2010, 12:11:37 pm
what year?

2008 May/june sorry =)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 04, 2010, 01:00:36 pm
CIE AS CHEM PAPER 1.
Q5.
How do you get the answer explain?

It'll be C.

4 bond pairs. 109.5 degrees
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sizbeauty on June 04, 2010, 01:13:05 pm
@nid404,
can u plz recommend me a gud buk for AS phsics which covers all conceptz n definitionz???plz i really need ur help!!!!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 04, 2010, 01:14:34 pm
I think Bath is good. That's what I use.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bath-Advanced-Science-Physics-Second/dp/0174387318
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sizbeauty on June 04, 2010, 08:20:52 pm
ok thanx alot nid :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: thecandydoll on June 06, 2010, 12:32:06 pm
Anyone solve this for me  ? :D
M/J 2007-----Physics Q4d (i) and (ii)
And M/J/2007----PHYSICS q1 the whole thing!
I dont get it =(
thank youuuu!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 06, 2010, 01:48:15 pm
Anyone solve this for me  ? :D
M/J 2007-----Physics Q4d (i) and (ii)
And M/J/2007----PHYSICS q1 the whole thing!
I dont get it =(
thank youuuu!

2 hrs
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 06, 2010, 04:09:08 pm
Anyone solve this for me  ? :D
M/J 2007-----Physics Q4d (i) and (ii)
And M/J/2007----PHYSICS q1 the whole thing!
I dont get it =(
thank youuuu!

4)d)
check the attachment
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on June 07, 2010, 02:24:24 pm
o/n 2005 phy paper 2
5cii ,dii
fo question 7 b iii
why would the lenght of between q and m be reduced should'nt it be increased?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on June 07, 2010, 03:07:33 pm
o/n 2005 phy paper 2
5cii ,dii
fo question 7 b iii
why would the lenght of between q and m be reduced should'nt it be increased?

5)c)ii)I=ka2

k=I/9

resultant amplitude=1
I = I/9

7)b)ii) R=rho l/ A

R directly proportional to the length
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on June 07, 2010, 04:31:24 pm
5)c)ii)I=ka2

k=I/9

resultant amplitude=1
I = I/9

7)b)ii) R=rho l/ A

R directly proportional to the length
could you please explain these in a bit more detail  ??? :-[
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: sweetie on June 07, 2010, 08:24:34 pm
can any1 xplain Q2d of may07 plzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: thecandydoll on June 08, 2010, 08:09:55 am
May/June 2006 ----Q7.
Please explainnn Thankkk you so much!
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: moon on June 09, 2010, 07:07:16 pm
Can somebody explain Nov 2005 Q16,31 june 2006 Q31, 33,38 june 2004 Q1, 2 and12 chemistry ppr 1??plzzzzz . I would really appreciate ur help,Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: ruby92 on June 09, 2010, 08:36:55 pm
m.j 2009 20
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: falafail on June 10, 2010, 04:14:10 am
isn't this thread a bit.. erm.. redundant?  ::)
and tbh, i find it unfair that only edexcel stuff get sticky threads? why can't edexcel people just post normal threads like the rest of us? >:[

but oh well, it's not like i'll be doing a levels anytime soon.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: mdymmm on August 22, 2010, 10:19:49 pm
hey every1 .. can any1 help me with this question ..

The diagram shows the graph of y=x^n where n is an integer.
Given that the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000), determine the value of n.

I just drew the curve roughly .. its not really accurate.
Thanks in advance :)
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 22, 2010, 10:24:11 pm
hey every1 .. can any1 help me with this question ..

The diagram shows the graph of y=x^n where n is an integer.
Given that the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000), determine the value of n.

I just drew the curve roughly .. its not really accurate.
Thanks in advance :)

The value is 3, because it is a cubic curve.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: S.M.A.T on August 23, 2010, 07:45:58 am
hey every1 .. can any1 help me with this question ..

The diagram shows the graph of y=x^n where n is an integer.
Given that the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000), determine the value of n.

I just drew the curve roughly .. its not really accurate.
Thanks in advance :)

how can a graph of y=x^n pass through (2,200) and (2,2000) at the same time ??? ???
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 23, 2010, 11:59:10 am
how can a graph of y=x^n pass through (2,200) and (2,2000) at the same time ??? ???

I have no idea either, but that definitely looks like a cubic graph.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: nid404 on August 23, 2010, 01:15:17 pm
Do you know the answer?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 23, 2010, 01:52:06 pm
Well n is defo 3. because it is a cubic graph.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on August 25, 2010, 02:23:53 pm
How does the brightness of the spots on the screen (fringes) , the separation, and the number of fringes change as we

i) change the width of each slit but the separation of the slit is same

ii) The separation of the slits is increased.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 26, 2010, 12:39:58 pm
How does the brightness of the spots on the screen (fringes) , the separation, and the number of fringes change as we

i) change the width of each slit but the separation of the slit is same

ii) The separation of the slits is increased.

I forgot about these....

The thing with exams is that once you're done you just forget what you did...
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Alpha on August 26, 2010, 12:45:44 pm
how can a graph of y=x^n pass through (2,200) and (2,2000) at the same time ??? ???

The passes twice where x=2.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 26, 2010, 12:47:26 pm
How does the brightness of the spots on the screen (fringes) , the separation, and the number of fringes change as we

i) change the width of each slit but the separation of the slit is same

ii) The separation of the slits is increased.

This may be of some use.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: S.M.A.T on August 26, 2010, 04:21:01 pm
The passes twice where x=2.

As far as  i know a graph of y=x^n cannot pass through these points at the same time.
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Alpha on August 26, 2010, 04:40:45 pm
As far as  i know a graph of y=x^n cannot pass through these points at the same time.

Do you know the power (n)?

I know you're thinking about the arc shaped curve. That arc can make a more acute bend. Can it?
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on August 26, 2010, 06:43:45 pm
y = x^n passing through (2,200) and (2,2000) doesnt seem right.

for any n belongs to R...no matter how large the value of y is ...the graph wont ever become parallel to the y-axis.

Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: S.M.A.T on August 26, 2010, 11:19:26 pm
Do you know the power (n)?

I know you're thinking about the arc shaped curve. That arc can make a more acute bend. Can it?

Oops :P i read the question wrong.It says the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000) not passes through (2,200) and (2,2000).




Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Saladin on August 26, 2010, 11:29:32 pm
Oops :P i read the question wrong.It says the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000) not passes through (2,200) and (2,2000).

That happens to me a lot, especially when I am sleepy! :D

Glad to see you so active Asif! :D
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: S.M.A.T on August 27, 2010, 09:55:19 am
hey every1 .. can any1 help me with this question ..

The diagram shows the graph of y=x^n where n is an integer.
Given that the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000), determine the value of n.

I just drew the curve roughly .. its not really accurate.
Thanks in advance :)

when x=2
y=2^n

The curve passes through a point with x-coordinate 2 and y-coordinate   200<y<2000

Therefore,
200<(2^n)<2000
(log(200)/log(2))<n<(log(2000)/log(2))
7.64<n<10.97
Since n is a integer,so n=8 or 9 or 10
Title: Re: ANY DOUBTS HERE!!!
Post by: Alpha on August 27, 2010, 02:37:30 pm
Oops :P i read the question wrong.It says the curve passes between the points (2,200) and (2,2000) not passes through (2,200) and (2,2000).






Oh okay.  :)