Marriage

[$tyli$h Executive]

@Nid:

Giving and taking = sharing as far as I can understand in the realistic sense.

[nid404]

Uhm....that's how you view it....ohk...no further comments then.

[nid404]

he was jokin dude

[Saladin]

So, it was not a joke???

I really like it when you joke, it makes debates more lively.

But I think I understand that whoever you want to marry, you will love dearly.

I dont think you want to 'buy love' rite???

[$tyli$h Executive]

Yes I will love her dearly or so I hope to. But I was just trying to say that it is normal and a basic instinct of human to like a life partner who has more money and wealth. No matter what someone may say, deep down, this is the case. And I'm not blaming it. Its perfectly normal and healthy to do so in my opinion.

Therefore, rather than saying philosophical stuffs, it would be better if everybody in this debate REALLY said what their opinion really is (like I freely expressed what I think in my previous post).

And therefore, it has been proved by the above assertions that, it is possible to buy love. Just like buying everything else. We will all be buying love, whether we realize this or not. I will, at least.

Again: All of the above is perfectly normal and healthy.

[Alpha]

A logical approach, but this decision is far more emotional than logical, that is what makes it adventerous. You see, you never know who turns out to be who, a perfect bride often turns out to be the perfect nightmare.

Now the idea of perfection, is it not viewable in different angles, know I would not want the perfect peanut butter and jelly sandwich to be funny, goofy, etc. Now would I? Or would I? Its hard to tell, because destiny is not for us to decide.

Now yes, I have said perfection is a matter of taste. And what you have done through that argument is simply re-instate logically what I compactly said, perfection is a personnification of the unattainable. What you would want that person to be....

And when you ban yourself, your name gets black. LOL

He said everything, except: Yeah, that was my view of perfection.  

Okay, I know, perfection will differ for different things... But we're talking of only one of those, a life-partner.  

Oh, so you've just been banning and reinstating yourself.  

I assure u alpha, most girls are not very realistic, atleast not the ones here.

I assure you too, girls can be very realistic when they have to.

Always the commedian. Keep it up.

Partly agree, Borakk is just talking now. We'll see when he acts later.  

[Alpha]

@Alpha's post in page 5:

Oops, I didn't notice your post! And the quote button is not working for me.

If a girl hates me as her worst enemy, I would not marry her. Common sense! There are many, and much better girls than her after all. She's not the only one. And I've got no right to force her into anything.

What I meant is that, I don't have any criterias in mind like you say 'someone I would love' etc. 'Love' is a generalized word after all. And I'm not much clear what it means. I wouldn't even know if she loves me. And she would have no idea if I love her.

"What type of husband or wife do you think you will make?"

Husband*

I would give her what she wants. Like expensive cars, jewellery, food and everything. She should, and will undoubtedly, love me for that.

You said there was no need for her to love you...

Ah, so your choice will be extended to everyone, not just one special you would want to marry.

By the way, you are not the only who can give her expensive cars, jewellery, food, and all. Then, your ideal should marry a prince, rather than you. 
Frankly, do you find it logical and normal that somebody marries you for what you have and not what you are? There are so many richer persons in the world, then why would she marry YOU? If somebody just takes away all your money, or you are bankrupt, then will there be no reason a girl would marry you?

@Nid:

Giving and taking = sharing as far as I can understand in the realistic sense.

My sense tells me Nid was right... Giving and taking >>> A Deal. A transaction, an exchange. You take BECAUSE you give.

Sharing > Giving because you want to give, and not expecting anything in return.

You give somebody a piece of bread, and takes one in return.
You share your own bread with her, and her with you, when you have none.
It's certainly not the same.

[$tyli$h Executive]

Were I joking in my posts?!    If you think I was, I better not make a fool out of myself and get outta here.

Therefore, I'm out of this debate. Continue everybody. I bet if I was joking in my posts, all of you were too.

[Saladin]

He said everything, except: Yeah, that was my view of perfection.  

Okay, I know, perfection will differ for different things... But we're talking of only one of those, a life-partner.  

Oh, so you've just been banning and reinstating yourself.  

I assure you too, girls can be very realistic when they have to.

Partly agree, Borakk is just talking now. We'll see when he acts later.  

What are you trying to prove or disprove.....

[Alpha]

Were I joking in my posts?!    If you think I was, I better not make a fool out of myself and get outta here.

Therefore, I'm out of this debate. Continue everybody. I bet if I was joking in my posts, all of you were too.

Do you always need to find reasons to get out of debates??

[Alpha]

What are you trying to prove or disprove.....

I just said directly what you implied indirectly. That's all Dude. 

[Saladin]

Sorry, 

I am more of a straight talk kinda guy, I used to talk in riddles before, in fact I had many gurus, loads of people taught me the art, but I gave it up, cuz at one point, I had to explain to the gurus what I was saying, but now, I realize this, things are felt best when said simply.

Like: I hate u, clearly implies that u hate him.

Unlike: the tail never stalks the bird, but silently, and solemnly watches over in glare.

[Alpha]

Sorry, 

I am more of a straight talk kinda guy, I used to talk in riddles before, in fact I had many gurus, loads of people taught me the art, but I gave it up, cuz at one point, I had to explain to the gurus what I was saying, but now, I realize this, things are felt best when said simply.

Like: I hate u, clearly implies that u hate him.

Unlike: the tail never stalks the bird, but silently, and solemnly watches over in glare.

No problem... 

I am beginning to understand your language.

[Saladin]

No problem... 

I am beginning to understand your language.

Em, thanks I guess...... *feeling confused*

[Alpha]

Em, thanks I guess...... *feeling confused*

No, no. I spoke plainly ( ) my thoughts, direct and clear.

No room for confusion.