Author Topic: [CIE] All Pure Mathematics (P1, P2 and P3) doubts here !  (Read 77772 times)

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #345 on: May 18, 2011, 02:20:27 pm »
are u referring at me? question 7 is about vector :/

sorry i was answering to aloha.

Offline SkyPilotage

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • Reputation: 65535
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #346 on: May 18, 2011, 02:23:54 pm »
http://www.xtremepapers.me/CIE/International%20A%20And%20AS%20Level/9709%20-%20Mathematics/9709_w10_ms_31.pdf

how to do question 7 part ii?
General Point of OP is (1+t)i+(2+t)j+(2-t)k
Dot product of OP.Direction vector of AB = 0 since they are perpendicular.--> you will get t=-1/3
Substitute in GM of OP and there you have it...

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #347 on: May 18, 2011, 02:41:09 pm »
Sorry I did a mistake.

Should have taken radius as one unit.

yeah so check the x and y values for the lowest point
y/x will give you tan of the argument



 

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #348 on: May 18, 2011, 02:48:25 pm »
as for the second part

listen when there is a equation like y^2/y^3+1 the only way to integrate this is when you differentiate the denominator the exact value should come in the numerator. In this case the differentiation of y^3+1 is 3y^2 but in the numerator it is y^2 so you take the 3 out by multiplying it by 1/3. so now it comes 1/3(y^2/y^3+1)and then you get 1/3ln(y^3+1)
so i am kinda right?

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #349 on: May 18, 2011, 02:50:02 pm »
so i am kinda right?

Yes sir/Madam.


Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #350 on: May 18, 2011, 02:54:11 pm »
Yes sir/Madam.


phew ! thank God, hey can u do ON 2003 Q 7 iii ) pleaseeee!!! =D

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #351 on: May 18, 2011, 04:03:45 pm »
Okay. wait.

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #352 on: May 18, 2011, 04:27:55 pm »
Please correct me if i am wrong.

Offline thecandydoll

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
  • Reputation: 780
  • Gender: Female
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #353 on: May 18, 2011, 04:46:56 pm »
so how do you get the greatest arg value and least too?

Offline SkyPilotage

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 184
  • Reputation: 65535
  • Gender: Male
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #354 on: May 18, 2011, 04:57:16 pm »
so how do you get the greatest arg value and least too?
The only was is by your graph!!! then You may use pythagrous theorem to find the value for greatest or least value of Z.

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #355 on: May 18, 2011, 05:02:30 pm »
Please correct me if i am wrong.
i owe u man!. =D
its madam By the way,  ;)

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #356 on: May 18, 2011, 05:06:58 pm »
Please correct me if i am wrong.
By the way, how do u know its half?

Offline ShiningStar

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Reputation: 401
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #357 on: May 18, 2011, 05:35:28 pm »
By the way, how do u know its half?
as the two triangles are congruents.

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #358 on: May 18, 2011, 05:39:05 pm »
OOOOHHH!!! now i get it!! thankyouuuuu soooooo much!

........

  • Guest
Re: All Pure Mathematics DOUBTS HERE!!!
« Reply #359 on: May 18, 2011, 06:03:56 pm »
Sorry I did a mistake.

Should have taken radius as one unit.

yeah so check the x and y values for the lowest point
y/x will give you tan of the argument



 

This was the second part.

« Last Edit: May 18, 2011, 06:05:38 pm by Dumb economist »