Author Topic: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE  (Read 18106 times)

Offline Meticulous

  • SF Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 2486
  • Reputation: 19401
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #165 on: June 08, 2010, 01:18:55 pm »
shouldnt we mention something about coherence??
and r u sure about the formulas isnt it for constructive:
path difference: n lamda

and destructive:
path difference= (n + 1/2) lambda and phase differnce = pie

coherent means same frequency

Offline poisonedrose

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Reputation: 528
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #166 on: June 08, 2010, 01:19:54 pm »
guys how to do o/n2008 q7bii
We know that the 2000 resistor has 3.6volts, so we subtract 6 from 3.6V giving us 2.4V
As the thermistor and 5000R are in parallel, they have the same voltage of 2.4V

Using the ratio method, we can do
3.6   :   2000
2.4   :      x
Finding x- which is 1,333 (the resistance of both of the devices)

From that, we use the combination resistance formula
5000*R2/5000+R2=13333
And with that, we can simply and find out R2- which is the resistance of the thermistor.

Offline sabrina

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: 207
  • Gender: Female
  • nothing is free. no pain, no gain.
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #167 on: June 08, 2010, 01:24:41 pm »
shouldnt we mention something about coherence??
and r u sure about the formulas isnt it for constructive:
path difference: n lamda

and destructive:
path difference= (n + 1/2) lambda and phase differnce = pie
i m sorry abt the constructive interference.forgot to put "n".
abt destructive the formula of my best of knowledge is correct
abt coherent sources = the interference should have constant phase difference to have observable interference. i think that's it.

Offline sabrina

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
  • Reputation: 207
  • Gender: Female
  • nothing is free. no pain, no gain.
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #168 on: June 08, 2010, 01:26:01 pm »
We know that the 2000 resistor has 3.6volts, so we subtract 6 from 3.6V giving us 2.4V
As the thermistor and 5000R are in parallel, they have the same voltage of 2.4V

Using the ratio method, we can do
3.6   :   2000
2.4   :      x
Finding x- which is 1,333 (the resistance of both of the devices)

From that, we use the combination resistance formula
5000*R2/5000+R2=13333
And with that, we can simply and find out R2- which is the resistance of the thermistor.


thanks alot :)

Offline halosh92

  • SF Senior Citizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 730
  • Reputation: 1113
  • Gender: Female
    • meticulous-me
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #169 on: June 08, 2010, 01:29:09 pm »
i m sorry abt the constructive interference.forgot to put "n".
abt destructive the formula of my best of knowledge is correct
abt coherent sources = the interference should have constant phase difference to have observable interference. i think that's it.

alright thx  :)
everyday we wake up is a miracle, then how do we say miracles dont happen?????

Offline neno

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 80
  • Reputation: 95
  • Gender: Female
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #170 on: June 08, 2010, 01:38:35 pm »
heyyy guys can u help me out with sum question
#may june 2008:Q6b
#mayjune 2009(21):Q5b

Offline scorpion9500

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Reputation: 19
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #171 on: June 08, 2010, 02:27:11 pm »
omg my brain just sopped
guys mj 2008 same q
6b
zzzz

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #172 on: June 08, 2010, 02:54:31 pm »
m/j 2008 2 b??

Offline highly_ambitious

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 84
  • Reputation: 79
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #173 on: June 08, 2010, 02:55:12 pm »
plz help m/j 2002 question 5.. what is this potential and internal energy ???..how to increase or decrease them through piston mechanism.??? plz explain this question

Offline The SMA

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Reputation: 73
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #174 on: June 08, 2010, 03:23:50 pm »
ok the wavelength they gave is basically the length between one antinode and another successive antinode ok?
(two positions loud voice as they mentioned)
so...
if u draw the wave  u will first have an antonide then node then antinode the normal wave
so the distance from one antinode to the node is 32.4/2 ok?
always remember distance from node to node = half a wavelength
and wavelength from node to antinode= quarter a wavelength
so wat we found is quarter a wavelength now multiply by 4
got it?

thanks halosh and chingoo, i think i finally got it. :)

Offline scorpion9500

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
  • Reputation: 19
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #175 on: June 08, 2010, 03:37:26 pm »
hey every1 about 2008 6b
i got it
i will just give u the hint and u figure it
if s2 is closed then electricity will pass through it and wont pass through B as there is less resistance in that route
so imagine that there is no B when s2 is closed

Offline zxcvbnm

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Reputation: 111
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #176 on: June 08, 2010, 03:46:46 pm »
hey so i came across a few questions regarding momentum (i dont remember the year) but they mainly dealt with the final momentum not being the same as the initial momentum, and asked for the reason for this...i think it was in november 09, paper 22, the question realted to projectiles...wait i'll try finding it...please help me with this asap!

Offline zxcvbnm

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Reputation: 111
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #177 on: June 08, 2010, 03:52:04 pm »
no,it's not from 09....so basically the question asked about a ball hitting a plate and bouncing, but the final momentum not being the same as the initial momentum....

Offline zxcvbnm

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • Reputation: 111
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #178 on: June 08, 2010, 03:59:42 pm »
oh momentum is conserved but i still dont get it
here
Q4, c

Offline Chingoo

  • Prima Donna u__u
  • SF Senior Citizen
  • *****
  • Posts: 798
  • Reputation: 65535
  • Gender: Female
  • RAWR
Re: P.H.Y.S.I.C.S P2 D.O.U.B.T.S CIE
« Reply #179 on: June 08, 2010, 04:18:43 pm »
Momentum of the ball before and after collision is not the same, because the momentum of an isolated system remains conversed, not of a particular object. Hence the plate gains the momentum in the direction lost by the ball and so, the momentum of the system (ball and plate) is conserved.
All that is on earth will perish:
But will abide (forever) the Face of thy Lord--full of Majesty, Bounty & Honor.
Then which of the favors of your Lord will ye deny?


Qura'n, Chapter 55: The Beneficent, Verses 26-28