Author Topic: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!  (Read 171673 times)

Offline Deadly_king

  • <<Th3 BO$$>>
  • Global Moderator
  • SF Farseer
  • *****
  • Posts: 3391
  • Reputation: 65078
  • Gender: Male
  • Hard work ALWAYS pays off.........just be patient!
    • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #450 on: February 10, 2011, 06:54:02 am »
Question 5 (a)

I said the path difference must be a odd number of non integer half wavelengths and the vector sum of the amplitudes must be zero.

The mark scheme says :

either same amplitude / intensity at M
or ratio of amplitudes is 1.28 / ratio of intensities is 1.28^2

Can someone please explain the statements in bold ? How can same amplitudes lead to an intensity of zero ?


My answers would have been :
1. The waves should meet in antiphase at M.(Phase difference = pie)
2. The sources must emit waves having the same amplitudes.

Same amplitudes meaning that their value should be the same but in antiphase.
Example : Amplitude of S1 = 10mm, amplitude of S2 = -10mm.

What you said about vector sum should be zero is correct but for amplitude we do not use the term vector. We just say they are equal in amplitude but in antiphase ;)

By ratio of amplitudes, the MS used it in terms of scale drawing. Use pythagoras theorem to find the direct distance from S2 to M. You'll see that it comes out to be 128cm.

Length is directly proportional to the amplitude and also to the square of intensity. ;)

(b) Distance that waves from S1 have to covered is 100cm while those from S2 have to cover 128cm. The difference therefore is 28cm.

Path difference = nV/F
Using the speed of sound and n=1 ----> F1 = (1 x 330)/0.28 = 1179
Hence F2 will be (2 x 1179) = 2358 and F3 = 3(1179) = 3535.

It can be easily seen that F4 will exceed the limit of 4.0 KHz.

So we'll be having 3 maxima at 1179, 2358 and 3535. This implies that we'll be having only 2 minima.

Hence answer is 2.

Hope it helps :)

elemis

  • Guest
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #451 on: February 10, 2011, 07:02:10 am »
Path difference = nV/F

Woah ! Where's this formula from ?

I've never heard of it. What do all the variables stand for ?

Offline Deadly_king

  • <<Th3 BO$$>>
  • Global Moderator
  • SF Farseer
  • *****
  • Posts: 3391
  • Reputation: 65078
  • Gender: Male
  • Hard work ALWAYS pays off.........just be patient!
    • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #452 on: February 10, 2011, 07:27:05 am »
Woah ! Where's this formula from ?

I've never heard of it. What do all the variables stand for ?

Hehe......this is derived form the formula V = f(lambda)

Lambda is replaced by nX where n represents the number of maximum or minimum and X is the path difference. ;)

elemis

  • Guest
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #453 on: February 10, 2011, 07:30:44 am »
Hehe......this is derived form the formula V = f(lambda)

Lambda is replaced by nX where n represents the number of maximum or minimum and X is the path difference. ;)

So can I also use this formula to determine the frequency at which a particular minima/maxima occurs at  ?

Like if I want to find the frequency at which the 5th minima occurs at can this formula be used ?

One other thing, supposing the question asked me to find the no. of MAXIMA would the answer still be THREE ?

Offline Deadly_king

  • <<Th3 BO$$>>
  • Global Moderator
  • SF Farseer
  • *****
  • Posts: 3391
  • Reputation: 65078
  • Gender: Male
  • Hard work ALWAYS pays off.........just be patient!
    • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #454 on: February 10, 2011, 07:32:57 am »
So can I also use this formula to determine the frequency at which a particular minima/maxima occurs at  ?

Like if I want to find the frequency at which the 5th minima occurs at can this formula be used ?

One other thing, supposing the question asked me to find the no. of MAXIMA would the answer still be THREE ?

Actually Path difference = n(lamda) ---> little mistake I made above.

Yupz.......you can. :)

Three it will be. :D

elemis

  • Guest
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #455 on: February 10, 2011, 07:35:58 am »
Actually Path difference = n(lamda) ---> little mistake I made above.

Hmm ? I dont understand ?

Offline Deadly_king

  • <<Th3 BO$$>>
  • Global Moderator
  • SF Farseer
  • *****
  • Posts: 3391
  • Reputation: 65078
  • Gender: Male
  • Hard work ALWAYS pays off.........just be patient!
    • @pump_upp - best crypto pumps on telegram !
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #456 on: February 10, 2011, 07:42:14 am »
Hmm ? I dont understand ?

Earlier I said Lamda is replaced by nX where X is the path difference. Actually this is not good.

The true equation is X = n(lamda) or Path difference = n(lamda)

Get me, now?

elemis

  • Guest
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #457 on: February 10, 2011, 08:05:58 am »
Earlier I said Lamda is replaced by nX where X is the path difference. Actually this is not good.

The true equation is X = n(lamda) or Path difference = n(lamda)

Get me, now?

Yeah, yeah. I understand.

Offline HUSH1994

  • SF Farseer
  • *******
  • Posts: 3431
  • Reputation: 55751
  • Gender: Male
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #458 on: February 11, 2011, 05:06:48 pm »
paper 11 ON 2010 Q 25,why is it A not B :S and isnt there the editor's reports?

Offline SauD~

  • Chére
  • SF V.I.P
  • ********
  • Posts: 8629
  • Reputation: 65535
  • Gender: Male
  • ~ I wish my dream comes true ~
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #459 on: February 11, 2011, 05:45:13 pm »
paper 11 ON 2010 Q 25,why is it A not B :S and isnt there the editor's reports?
is this IGCSE or A'Level doubt?

it seems to me that it is IGCSE:
so the answer is A because the word echo means that the sound has traveled twice times, so half the time 0.4 -> 0.2

now apply the formula... distance = Speed x time
                                                 1200  x  0.2 = 240 ;)


Offline The Golden Girl =D

  • Without Allah I'm nothing <3
  • Honorary Member
  • SF Overlord
  • *****
  • Posts: 13757
  • Reputation: 65532
  • Ain't Nothin worth your tears =D
    • www.thegoldengirl157.blogspot.com
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #460 on: February 12, 2011, 11:11:55 am »
is this IGCSE or A'Level doubt?

it seems to me that it is IGCSE:
so the answer is A because the word echo means that the sound has traveled twice times, so half the time 0.4 -> 0.2

now apply the formula... distance = Speed x time
                                                 1200  x  0.2 = 240 ;)


Saud this is in the A level board so it's A Level not IGCSE ;)
Verily, in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find rest(13:28)

Please, Don't forget to Include GG in your Prayers =D

elemis

  • Guest
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #461 on: February 12, 2011, 11:16:24 am »
paper 11 ON 2010 Q 25,why is it A not B :S and isnt there the editor's reports?

I = k A2

Hence, we square the amplitude to find the intensity.

Thus, 0.52 = 0.250

Offline SauD~

  • Chére
  • SF V.I.P
  • ********
  • Posts: 8629
  • Reputation: 65535
  • Gender: Male
  • ~ I wish my dream comes true ~
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #462 on: February 12, 2011, 04:21:29 pm »
Saud this is in the A level board so it's A Level not IGCSE ;)
i am never able to help anyone :'( :'( :(

Offline aqws0987

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Reputation: 12
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #463 on: February 13, 2011, 04:12:42 am »
Help me with this one. I don't understand how is the answer obtained

Question:
The manufacturer of a digital ammeter quotes its uncertainty as +/-1.5% +/-2 digits

The meter is used to measure the current from a a.c. power supply. The currernt is found to fluctuate randomly between 1.58A and 2.04A. Determine the most likely value of the current, with its uncertainty

Answer given is (2.01 +/- 0.09) A

How is the answer obtained?

Offline Sue T

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • Reputation: 5415
  • Gender: Female
Re: ALL CIE PHYSICS DOUBTS HERE !!!
« Reply #464 on: February 14, 2011, 12:59:05 pm »
i have an A2 doubt from the app booklet:
pg 8 at the bottom ''the input impedance of the op-amp....'' and fig. 1.13
i dont get it  :-\
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad.