IGCSE/GCSE/O & A Level/IB/University Student Forum
Teachers and Students => Debates => Topic started by: astarmathsandphysics on August 05, 2010, 08:42:11 pm
-
I tought he was a campaigning politician.
http://wikileaks.org/wiki/Obama's_Chilling_Crew:_The_legal_harassment_of_those_investigating_Tony_Rezko
No doubt he has a post presidentia;l book deal and speak circuit all lined up at $1000000 per appearance
-
WATERGATE SCANDAL
-
America has seen far more worse to be honest. I wonder how much money d*ck Cheney has earned all the while during his stint as the vice president. Bunch of tossers.
-
d*ck cheney buys biscuits with his earnings
-
d*ck cheney buys biscuits with his earnings
:P, ok maybe not the best of examples..
-
But wait! They lied about finding weapons of mass destruction and invaded a country rich in oil and wealth! How is that not corrupt?? d*ck probably has enough money to buy several biscuit factories by now.
-
Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world.
-
Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world.
What do you think the war was for? To destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? lol
-
What do you think the war was for? To destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? lol
Black Gold.
-
What do you think the war was for? To destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? lol
I am not among those elites who decided that. So I do not know for sure.
-
I am not among those elites who decided that. So I do not know for sure.
Well this was a better response than 'Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world'. Less 'pseudointellectual' at least.
-
Well this was a better response than 'Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world'. Less 'pseudointellectual' at least.
Pseudo huh? I am not a conspiracy believer. And I am not close minded either. Just referring to mass confidence
-
Pseudo huh? I am not a conspiracy believer. And I am not close minded either. Just referring to mass confidence
There is no conspiracy. People are dying in Iraq, there is no sign of the war being over anytime soon, it's the tax payer's money are being spent in the trillions, and obviously these weapons of mass destruction were never found. America wanted to 'free' the people of iraq, but the place is even worse than before. One doesn't need to be a rocket scientist to figure who are actually benefiting from this war.
-
Well let's clear this up, since you clearly misunderstood me.
When I said "Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world. ", I was referring to
d*ck probably has enough money to buy several biscuit factories by now.
Clearly you didn't get the joke when I was trying to compare that to illuminati. And I can't figure out how you equated it to the iraq attack.
Since this is cleared up, let me point some things in your posts that caught my eyes.
Well this was a better response than 'Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world'. Less 'pseudointellectual' at least.
Hope I've cleared this one.
There is no conspiracy. People are dying in Iraq, there is no sign of the war being over anytime soon, it's the tax payer's money are being spent in the trillions, and obviously these weapons of mass destruction were never found. America wanted to 'free' the people of iraq, but the place is even worse than before.
The oil case is considered as a conspiracy as well. Secondly, there's more to U.S's invasion on Iraq than oil.
One doesn't need to be a rocket scientist to figure who are actually benefiting from this war.
I hope your sarcasm is not needed anymore. Please preserve it for future use.
-
I am a conspiricist. Is more fun than thinking politicians are trying hard to make things better for us and make us all better people.
-
Well let's clear this up, since you clearly misunderstood me.
When I said "Another conspiracy theory, like Illuminati trying to take over the world. ", I was referring to
Clearly you didn't get the joke when I was trying to compare that to illuminati. And I can't figure out how you equated it to the iraq attack.
How is that a conspiracy theory? d*ck Cheney has a net worth estimated to be between $30 million and $100 million. And no I still don't get the joke because it's hard to see the logic of how you connected the two.
The oil case is considered as a conspiracy as well. Secondly, there's more to U.S's invasion on Iraq than oil.
and yet you say
I am not among those elites who decided that. So I do not know.
Contradictory much? And I know there is, but the financial gains from such an invasion is unlikely to have never crossed their minds.
I hope your sarcasm is not needed anymore. Please preserve it for future use.
I wasn't being sarcastic.
-
If there was gain on their minds it isnt now. By the time the US gets out of Iraq and Afghanistan it will be mortagaged to the Chinese. Every brick and blade of grass in America.
-
How is that a conspiracy theory? d*ck Cheney has a net worth estimated to be between $30 million and $100 million. And no I still don't get the joke because it's hard to see the logic of how you connected the two.
Hello?
d*ck cheney buys biscuits with his earnings
:P, ok maybe not the best of examples..
The statements or rather, jokes were clearly about Darth Chenny and his biscuits. And I tried to add to the humor by calling it a conspiracy. Since anything related with Darth is considered to be a conspiracy. got me?
and yet you sayContradictory much? And I know there is, but the financial gains from such an invasion is unlikely to have never crossed their minds.
Realize that I said about oil when you clearly stated that financial gains where the only things in their mind.
And I said "I do not know" when you asked me for a reason
What do you think the war was for? To destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction? lol
Do you think that media knows everything that those ELITES decide? Because we know so little of it, saying that financial gains is the only thing in their mind is too much bold. Thus my reply - I do not know.
One was a reply to your question and another was a correction to your statement. Equating two different problems whose answers are different is very much a mistake.