IGCSE/GCSE/O & A Level/IB/University Student Forum
Qualification => Subject Doubts => IGCSE/ GCSE => Sciences => Topic started by: @d!_†oX!© on November 06, 2009, 12:54:41 pm
-
A bungee jumper of mass 60kg jumps from a bridge tied to an elastic rope which becomes taut after he falls 10m. Consider the jumper when he has fallen another 10m and is traveling at 15m/s.
Work out how much energy is stored in the rope. Take g= 10m/s2 and ignore air resistance.
now i know this is a pretty easy questioon bt i cant get the answer how to do it....the answer is 5250 J....
i did it by subtracting the k.e from the p.e
but why is it so???
guys help plss
-
the rope will store PE right??
if not it will have strain energy!!
so if PE then it will be mgh = 60*10*10 = 6000!!
but thatss not the ans so!!
starin energy will be MA = 60*10 = 600!!
but this is also not the ans!!
-
dude u took the pe wrong cuz it will be 10*20*60
read the ques carefully shrey!!!
-
dude u took the pe wrong cuz it will be 10*20*60
read the ques carefully shrey!!!
]
due i have my eyes in place!!!
it says - 10 meters !!
how can you take 20????
-
Consider the jumper when he has fallen another 10m
can u read this????so 10 + 10 = 20 m
now dont come up with some other excuse to cover up plssss....
-
not excuse but i forgot abt it :P :P
we need to subtract PE by KE beacuse it is starin energy right??
and at the time i guess it is PE and just becoming KE so it needs to be subratctd!!!
i guess
lets wait and watch until astar arives!!
-
By the way is this the ans:
60*20*10=12000
0.5*102*60=3000
so 12000-3000 = 9000!!
as you said i have subtracted PE and KE!!
but not the same ans!!
did i do ne mistake!!
i guess i did!!!
-
yeah u did...the speed is 15 not 10!!!!!!! >:(
-
oh yaa!!
og the mistake!!
it must be 0.5*152*60=6750
so it will be 12000-6750=5250..!!
By the way i also have same wuestion why subtarct???
-
when the jumper is in the middle of his action, the PE stored reduces as it gets converted to KE. Therefore, we subtract the KE from the PE.
i guess this is the answer.
-
even i had the same thought in mind...
wt i think is that
elastic energy of the rope+kinetic energy=potential energy
thus, elastic energy=potential -kinetic
i just wanted to confirm it....it'd be gr8 if astar cud say smthng on this....
@shrey dude that's what my question is!!!!!do u like start doing a question sans seeing wat's asked???
-
we are asking same questions!!
i did not see and copy!!
By the way your logic has sense aadi!!
-
60*10*20-0.5*60*15^2=5250
-
even i had the same thought in mind...
wt i think is that
elastic energy of the rope+kinetic energy=potential energy
thus, elastic energy=potential -kinetic
i just wanted to confirm it....it'd be gr8 if astar cud say smthng on this....
@shrey dude that's what my question is!!!!!do u like start doing a question sans seeing wat's asked???
y u getting so hyper?
-
THanks astar!!!
nd aadi when did i get hyper dude???
-
chil chil!!
we got the ans but why shud we subtract!!
did astar answered???
-
u still didn't understand shrey??
-
is the reason same as u and aadi had thought!!
then i got it!
if it is something else then explain!!
-
cuz the potential energy is lost as kinetic energy in the second half....so the entire potential energy is not stored in the rope....
k.e lost=p.e gained and vice versa
-
yup!!!!
our ideas were correct!!
mine was in a scientific form nd his was an explanatory form for the same...
-
got it!!
thanx dudes!!!
-
got it!!
thanx dudes!!!
welcome
-
thik hai thik hai!!
-
yup!!!!
our ideas were correct!!
mine was in a scientific form nd his was an explanatory form for the same...
o_O_o_O
-
dude!!
chil maar!!
-
hey guys!!
whats the difference between a fixed resistor and a preset resistor??
-
hey guys!!
whats the difference between a fixed resistor and a preset resistor??
fixed resistors r fixed...lol
preset resistor is a type of variable resistor....u needn't know abt it for the igs
-
ohhhh man!!!
y is it that i always end up asking question that are not needed in my syllabus??!!!!!
anyways cud u still expand a bit more nid??!!!
-
Preset resistors are used in circuits when it is necessary to alter the resistance. Dark/light and temperature sensors usually have these components as the preset resistor allows the circuit to be made more or less sensitive
-
ohhhhh....as in when the use of a potential divider circuit s used??!!!
thnxx..got it....perhaps it is used with transistors and all....
soo is it a part of the A level curriculum??
-
not in sylabus!!
then no need to know!!
but extra info is not at all dangerous!!! :P :P
-
I haven't started wid electricity in A levels as yet.
There r two kinds of variable resistors i know of- Control and preset..(extra info) :P
-
By the way thuis was too extar which can cause dangerous situations!!! :P :P
-
do we need to know fusion and fission???
if yes, then what exactly???its such a vast topic.....
-
do we need to know fusion and fission???
if yes, then what exactly???its such a vast topic.....
You don't really need to know anything in detai. Just the chain reaction in the nuclear reactor
-
ya!!
true fussion is splitting and fission takes place in sun nd is abt joiing!!!
-
ohhkkk....Thanks guys...
-
np np!!
ne time!!
-
ohhkkk....Thanks guys...
abbe mensun not
-
yaya!!
same here!!
-
okay guys...another one...
A mercury thread of a thermometer is 12mm long when placed in melting ice, and 82mm long when placed in boiling water.
Find the:
a)length of the thread at 50oC
b)temperature when the length is 61mm long
plss guys, i need a full-fledged explanation for this cuz whenever i see this type of question after say 2-3 days, i tend to again do it wrong....plsss tell me a way to remember it forever....
Thanks guys!! :) :)
-
12:0::x:50
solve it!!
and then similarly do
12:0::61:x
solve for x and get the ans!!
-
u think u make sense shrey????
12:0
which is 12/0
which is infinte.....apply ur brain a little b4 replying man!!! :P
-
abbe toh firtake
82 naa
take 82:100
-
no dude....with this one..the answer for 50 comes as 41..whereas the answer is 47
-
okay guys...another one...
A mercury thread of a thermometer is 12mm long when placed in melting ice, and 82mm long when placed in boiling water.
Find the:
a)length of the thread at 50oC
b)temperature when the length is 61mm long
plss guys, i need a full-fledged explanation for this cuz whenever i see this type of question after say 2-3 days, i tend to again do it wrong....plsss tell me a way to remember it forever....
Thanks guys!! :) :)
look adi we knw that b/w 12mm and 82mm lies 100.c. cuz melting point of ice=0 and boiling point of water=100. therefore in this scale 1mm=(82-12)/100
=>7/10=0.7
=>1.c=0.7mm
therfore at 50.c length=12+(0.7*50)=47mm
and then the next part=>
1.c=0.7mm
therefore the length for which there is a temperature change=>61-12=49mm
therfore the temperature at this=>49/0.7=70.c
just do it by simple unitary method
got it?
-
see, acc. to u
0.7C - 1 mm
so 1C = 1/0.7 mm
so wt i didnt understand is y u did (50*0.7)
cuz 50 is the temp and 0.7 is also the temp at 1mm....so shudn't it be 50*0.7
bt if i do that den the answer is wrong....plsss dude tell me some way to get this thing rite into my head!!!
-
see, acc. to u
0.7C - 1 mm
so 1C = 1/0.7 mm
so wt i didnt understand is y u did (50*0.7)
cuz 50 is the temp and 0.7 is also the temp at 1mm....so shudn't it be 50*0.7
bt if i do that den the answer is wrong....plsss dude tell me some way to get this thing rite into my head!!!
dude 0.7 is not the temperature at 1 mm it is the value of the temperature of that changes for each increase in 1mm. theyve just given u 12mm-82mm to confuse u. this is the same as 1mm-70mm
cuz theyve started from 12 u hve to add 12 to (50*0.7), theres no hard nd fast way to answer it, uve gotta understand wat there askin and then answer accordingly
-
no it shud be 70
check again
-
no dude...its 47mm nd 70C
nd cooldude...i'm kinda beginning to understand it now...
-
okk
I will try my best to explain this
Given
at 0oC=12mm
& and 100oC=82mm
difference is 70. So if the reading was.....if for 0 and 70 mm, then length would have been 70/2=35mm for 50 degrees....exactly half
so when the startin point is 12oC...u will add 12 to the difference/2=47mm. I hope ur able to figure out the logic.
The length for 50 degrees would be right in the middle of 12 and 82
-
yaa i got that 50 one like dt too...wt about the second part???
i really thing cooldude's explanation is gud...bt i really dont wanna forget it again...so pls guys try nd give me ur working ways to..so dt i have some more ways to do it nd i do not forget...
-
assume its from 1mm to 70mm
theyre asking 61mm but thats frm their scale, from our scale it wud be...61-12 = 49
so
70mm - 100
49mm - 70
-
nid's method is good for the first part and first part only (it is the simplest way by which u can understand this part of the q), but since u have to do the second part also which does nt hve somehting which is half way or quarter way so u hve to do it by the unitary method. if u do both parts by diff methods then u urself will get confused
-
yaaa dts rite cooldude...
@aadi dts wat i wanna know dude...how did ya get 70 for 49 mm??????
-
yaaa dts rite cooldude...
@aadi dts wat i wanna know dude...how did ya get 70 for 49 mm??????
dude!!!!!!!!!!! i also explained the second part...look!!!!!!!!!!
ill paste it for u--
1.c=0.7mm
1mm=1/0.7.c
therefore the length for which there is a temperature change=>61-12=49mm
therfore the temperature at this=>49*(1/0.7)=70.c
just do it by simple unitary method
and also since the temperature starts from 0, 70 is ur final ans but cuz the length starts from 12 so u hve to consider 12 in every calculation u make wich evry1 is trying to tell u
-
sry sry it shud 0 to 70
ok look..
in the range of 12 to 82
they are asking 61
61 is 49 above from 12
so for our scale which 0 to 70, we have to go 49 above from 0 = 0+49 = 49
got it?
-
@ cooldude chill man...i've seen urs..nd i got it....i said m just looking for alternate ways...!!!stay calm man...take a deep breath in.........and out......cool??!!
@aadi u till didnt get my point man..i know till here...now how did u get 70 fro 49?? is my question.....
-
okay for the second part assume the same way
so
assuming
100o=70mm(82-12)
then xo= 61mm-12mm
x= 4900/70=70o
-
@ cooldude chill man...i've seen urs..nd i got it....i said m just looking for alternate ways...!!!stay calm man...take a deep breath in.........and out......cool??!!
@aadi u till didnt get my point man..i know till here...now how did u get 70 fro 49?? is my question.....
k dude, By the way just look at my last post ive told u a few things, let other ppl give their views nw
-
@ cooldude chill man...i've seen urs..nd i got it....i said m just looking for alternate ways...!!!stay calm man...take a deep breath in.........and out......cool??!!
@aadi u till didnt get my point man..i know till here...now how did u get 70 fro 49?? is my question.....
dude, thats the easier part.
its simple ratio proportion
70mm - 100
49mm - 100/70 * 49 = 70
got it?
-
ook guys!!!ya i got it now...will be back when i forget it again!!
Thanks cooldude, nid, aadi, nd shrey(for trying just without even seeing the question)
-
ook guys!!!ya i got it now...will be back when i forget it again!!
Thanks cooldude, nid, aadi, nd shrey(for trying just without even seeing the question)
ur welcome
and chill man!..wat if shrey cudnt get it? its k..happens sometimes yaar!. credit nahi dena hai to mat de yaar! :)
-
arrey yaar mai to uski taang khech raha hun dts it!!! :P
no personal grudges dude!! ;D :D
-
ur welcome :)
-
lol..its k.. :P
wasnt this a MCQ question?
-
lol..its k.. :P
wasnt this a MCQ question?
nope, its from the igcse study guide
-
i saw it in a book....bt anyways i have seen this in p3 as well
-
i think this thread should be renamed to "adi' questions" .....i think i will fill this whole thread with just my question
okk..so here i go again..
The definition of sound energy is "longitudinal pressure waves that travel through a compressible material"
now my question is that sounds travel through solids...but solids are incompressible...
another addition....sounds waves are a series of compressions and rarefactions....in air, they compress the air molecules...but how do they do that i solid???
-
http://www.surendranath.org/Applets/Waves/Lwave01/Lwave01Applet.html
longitudinal waves is not in much detail in the ig syllabus....yeh link mein jaa ke chck the motion of particles....ull understand better
-
The distances between molecules in solids are very small, i.e., solids are more dense - as compared to liquids and gases. Because they are so close, than can collide very quickly, i.e. it takes less time for a molecule of the solid to 'bump' into its neighborough and thus transferring the energy.
-
Yes in fact in terms of energy......if u actually go to see how energy is transferred u will know how the oscillation n stuff is formed.......anyway abhi ke liye only this much needed
-
okk....but this sounds like a compromise sorts....i mean it shud be in the syllabus dude...
-
plz, can u help in jun.08 Q4(c), and Jun.07 Q10 (b) need explanation for these questions. thanks.
-
plz, can u help in jun.08 Q4(c), and Jun.07 Q10 (b) need explanation for these questions. thanks.
okay so first june 07 q10 b--
see if we want to change the temperature at which the lamp switches on, we have to change the value of resistance R1. if we increase the value of the resistance then more voltage will flow through the transistor and if we decrease the voltage then less voltage will flow through the transistor. therefore if we assume that the amount of heat falling on the thermistor is constant then when we increase or decrease the value of R1 so will the value of the voltage passing through the tranistor will change. so if we want to make the lamp switch on at a different temperature we change the value of R1 because if the heat is falling on the thermistor and thus its resistance decreasing then if the base voltage is enough to switch on the transistor it will light however decreasing the value of the resistor R1 will cause the voltage flowing through the transistor to be too less to switch it on (this is if we want to make the temperature at which the lamp lights more; just explain the opposite thing if u want the temperature at which the transistor lights lower than it is and also u dnt need to expalin all this, ive done this to help u understand it and if u want a shortened version ill be happy to help). therefore in short the temperature at which the lamp lights can be changed by changing the value of R1. (the lamp lights when the base voltage becomes enough for the lamp to switch on)
hope it helps
p.s. i think ive explained a bit too much though
okay now the second q--
see if the temperature increases so will the kinetic energy of the particles. therefore they will exert more pressure in the tube and therefore if the pressure increases the switch will switch on. this is because when we pressed the rubber cover the same thing was achieved but when there is a higher temperature it comes to the same thing
Note--when the transistor switches on it will in turn switch on the lamp
-
okk....but this sounds like a compromise sorts....i mean it shud be in the syllabus dude...
dude u really wanna know stuff that's not in the ig syllabus.....maybe ur inquisitive and wanna know more but this is not the right time......ur too late
-
wow cooldude!
-
dude u really wanna know stuff that's not in the ig syllabus.....maybe ur inquisitive and wanna know more but this is not the right time......ur too late
i am inquisitive dude.....but u know what i am actually getting scared now...what about u???
-
i am inquisitive dude.....but u know what i am actually getting scared now...what about u???
I'm done wid my igz :D.....my AS in June :-X
-
hey cooldude, that was an amazing explanation. thanks a lot! because that cleared my concepts of transistor too! +rep to u!
-
i am inquisitive dude.....but u know what i am actually getting scared now...what about u???
one piece of advice...
dont get tooo inquistive or ull mess up!
just study whats there in the syllabus.
-
hey cooldude, that was an amazing explanation. thanks a lot! because that cleared my concepts of transistor too! +rep to u!
Thanks!!!!!!!!! i was just wondering whether my explanantion was a bit too detailed and whether ppl wud understand it properly..Thanks for the rep ;) happy to help
-
wow cooldude!
Thanks
-
oh yes and cooldude...that explanation ws really good :)
-
yes it definitely was. thanks again!
-
oh yes and cooldude...that explanation ws really good :)
Thanks
-
awesome explanation dude....
-
awesome explanation dude....
Thanks
-
Thanx 4 ur awesome explanation, but i still need J08 Q4 c 2nd varient and 4 that question y did u choose R1 and not R2??? ???
-
Thanx 4 ur awesome explanation, but i still need J08 Q4 c 2nd varient and 4 that question y did u choose R1 and not R2??? ???
okay for y i chose r1 and not r2----
this is cuz r1 is just in place to prevent too much current flowing throught the transistor and damaging it. r1 and the thermistor r acting as a potential divider; when we change the resitance of one of the 2 the voltage across the thermistor or r1 changes depending upon which components resistance we have changed. as u knw the voltage flowing across a component is governed by the resistance of the component. since we have to change the value at which the temperature at which the bulb lamps we have to change the resistance of r1. r1 is a part of the potential divider, r2 is not
ill just answer ur other q with my next post
-
just to add on nd make it even easier for moon to understand....
see, just remember that to alter the temperature at which the light switches on, u gotta change the resistances as cooldude said...
so there are two resistors in the circuit, nd u can't change the resistance of the thermistor cuz it depends on the temperature only...so to change the voltage at which the transistor switches on, we have to change the resistance of R1....
hope u get it!!!
-
i didnt knw which varaint u were askin for, neway ur ans---
we knw that (p1*v1)=(p2*v2);
therefore 12000*75=300000*v2
therefore v2=30mm
the distance of the piston from the closed end was=75mm
the distance of the piston from the closed end now is=30mm
therefore the distance it has been moved=75-30-45mm
-
hey for ur second question:
see
P1*V1=P2*V2
P1=1.2*10^5 Pa
V1=Area*75
P2=3*10^5 Pa
V2=length*Area
because u know the area is same
thus put the values in the formula and find out the length
length=30mm
now, because the piston was 75mm from the closed end and is now 30mm from the closed end, thus the distance moved=75mm - 30mm =40mm
-
sorry cooldude...didn't see that u already posted.... ::)
-
sorry cooldude...didn't see that u already posted.... ::)
k np
-
Thanx a lot for both of u as u helped me to understand these questions... :) :)
-
Thanx a lot for both of u as u helped me to understand these questions... :) :)
np, ur welcum feel free to ask some more qs
-
i didnt knw which varaint u were askin for, neway ur ans---
we knw that (p1*v1)=(p2*v2);
therefore 12000*75=300000*v2
therefore v2=30mm
the distance of the piston from the closed end was=75mm
the distance of the piston from the closed end now is=30mm
therefore the distance it has been moved=75-30-45mm
By the way cooldude...ur method is wrong cuz 75mm is not the volume but the length....u gotta show it in the volume format as i did in my post....
just look back cuz if u show this working in ur p3, u will lose some of ur marks there....
-
i suppose he cancelled out the area because they were common, and thus had only 75mm
-
hmmm...maybe because dts wt we ought to do...bt m just telling him dt the cancelling of the area is necessary to show....
By the way aadi, do u know the formula for the focal length...???
i know for convex lens, just wanna know if it is the same for concave as well...
-
i guess its the same
=
+ 
diverging lenses are assigned negative focal lengths.
-
i thought it was negative So cuz its also on the same side then...
-
what?!?!?!
dint i write negative?
-
u sadi f negative nd m saying So negative....as in the distance of the object from the center...
-
do we have to know that formula? can anyone expand on it because i am really confused ??? o_O
-
its very simple halp...see i the exam u wud not be asked to use this formula,....u'd be asked to make a sketch diagram..bt this is for ur own reference nd checking....simply put the values in the formula nd take out the required thing
f- focal length
So-distance of object from the center
Si-distance of image from the center
-
its very simple halp...see i the exam u wud not be asked to use this formula,....u'd be asked to make a sketch diagram..bt this is for ur own reference nd checking....simply put the values in the formula nd take out the required thing
f- focal length
So-distance of object from the center
Si-distance of image from the center
u shud specify from the centre of the lens, oh yeh and about that q, i cancelled the area like aadi says. but if u want to knw the area of cross-section, its the same, if u really want to explain it u shud also say that the area of cross-section of the piston stays constant cuz the examiner can assume that the area of cross section of the cylinder remains constant (just to make it look as u knw what ur talkin about ;) )
-
ya it'll be even better if u mentioned that...
-
o/n 2006 paper 3 question 8c plzz
help
-
dude that question was looooong deleted!!!!
-
okk..i just saw the ms. chill man, ur exclamations speak a lot.
-
Ohh yeahh, sweet guys :D
-
ur welcome halp!!!
@aadi....dude y u getting hot?i was just telling ya...dts just a habit to use many punctuations...lol..
see i used it for halp as well unintentionally...
-
hey guys do we need to know this relationship:
Resistance= (constant*length)/area of cross-section
???
just saw it in the study guide....i know its simple to remember and use both...m just asking for curiosity....
-
yes ofc u need to knw this
-
ohhh...ohkkay....
bt never seen any question on this in any past paper b4.... :-[
-
ohhh...ohkkay....
bt never seen any question on this in any past paper b4.... :-[
yes there r questions in past papers....mostly MCQs but yes some in theory too
-
challo theek hai..thanks a lot~~~
-
challo theek hai..thanks a lot~~~
ur welks
-
anyone has notes on circuits,radioactivity and refractive index of glass pls? :) really need them thx
-
don't have notes right now...nd neither wud they help u at the last moment....just ask ur specific doubt here...nd we'll try to solve it....tell us ur doubt
-
My first attempt at writing ig physics notes
http://www.astarmathsandphysics.com/igcse_physics_notes_menu.html
-
wat is da minimum voltage required to switch on the transistor???????
-
it varies for each model of transistor...
will be mentioned in the question if required in the calculation
-
Try here too
http://freeexampapers.com/Dndex.php?d=SUdDU0UvUGh5c2ljcy9DSUUvUmVzb3VyY2Vz&catagory=
-
ohhh...okay thanks adi
-
hey guys temme....wats the use of a capacitor in a circuit...
as in the book says its used when a time delay is required....bt wt exactly is a time delay...as in my question is why is the time delay required...any examples of circuits where a time delay is required??
-
Time delay as in burglar alarm - 20 seconds to close the front door and turn the alarm off before the alarm goes off
-
hey guys temme....wats the use of a capacitor in a circuit...
as in the book says its used when a time delay is required....bt wt exactly is a time delay...as in my question is why is the time delay required...any examples of circuits where a time delay is required??
it is in an industrial oven. if we opened the door of the oven then a alarm would sound but if the door was opened and closed within the time it took for the capacitor to charge or discharge no alarm would sound. an alarm would be needed if there was a malfunction and if the oven door opened accidentally
-
ohhhhh.....yeahh....okkk...Thanks sir!! ;D
nd u too cooldude... :)
-
ohhhhh.....yeahh....okkk...Thanks sir!! ;D
nd u too cooldude... :)
By the way its all in the guide..if uve read it thoroughly :P
-
are you all refering to physics guide which is red in colour ???
By the way adi i had read the question!!
and tahnk u for mentioninng me in thank list!! :P
-
are you all refering to physics guide which is red in colour ???
By the way adi i had read the question!!
and tahnk u for mentioninng me in thank list!! :P
yep the mike folland one
-
yep the mike folland one
thats a coool book!!
-
plz can u help in Jun.01 Q.8 a(ii) and how to measure theamplitude in compression and rarefaction?
-
plz can u help in Jun.01 Q.8 a(ii) and how to measure theamplitude in compression and rarefaction?
don't hav the paper...could u upload it
-
i dont have the paper....nd its not on fep....so post the question here if possible....
-
Here is the question
-
wat is da minimum voltage required to switch on the transistor???????
is it 0.6V
if no, what is 0.6V for?
-
where is 0.6V??
it is 0.6W
-
is it 0.6V
if no, what is 0.6V for?
aadi its given in the guide for that specific model, it varies from model to model, for the one which u say ( i think ur talking about the guides transistor) then for that it is. they shud give u the voltage in the exam
-
I = P/V = 0.6/1.5 = 0.4A
R = V/I => 4/0.4 = 10 ohms
@cooldude - ohh..okk..thanks
-
adithe ans is easy!
charge flowing is 0.6*20=1.2C
and i am just solving the current ka problem!!
-
so the question is solved rite??!!was easy By the way
-
adithe ans is easy!
charge flowing is 0.6*20=1.2C
and i am just solving the current ka problem!!
abbe oye, i have solved the question, and that 0.6V ka is minimum volts for transistors..not this q ka..check the quoted post dude!!
-
ohh..!!
got it!!
By the way wats the current then!!
0.4 rite?
-
he didnt ask that. check wat te q says yaar!!
-
d charge ans is 8C ,,, 0.4*20 = 8
nd yea .. aadi has don't d rest
-
kk..!!
i did not read the resistance ka part!!
yu solved first two i did the last one!!
its k!!
easy question i guess!!
-
d charge ans is 8C ,,, 0.4*20 = 8
nd yea .. aadi has don't d rest
charge = power * tmie!!!
that is 0.6*20!!!
this time i read the question!!!
-
charge = current * time
charge = 0.4 * 20 = 8C
???
nd power = Itv = Charge * Voltage
-
charge = power * tmie!!!
that is 0.6*20!!!
this time i read the question!!!
abbe oye, Q = I *t
-
hey one last doubt???
will ticker tape question come in the paer!!!
i have seen one such question in 2008 winter !!
dude pls hel[p!!
-
abbe oye, Q = I *t
toh fir wat is power * time!!!??
-
R = V/I => 4/0.4 = 10 ohms
Why did we find the resistance by 4/0.4 instead of 1.5/0.4 ??? ??????
-
oye yaa!!
didnt notice it!!
-
Can som1 plz tell me wen 2 use sin r/sin i instead of sin i /sin r to calculate the refractive index?
-
sin i / sin r if from optically less dense medium to optically more dense medium
sin r / sin i if from optically dense medium to less dense medium
-
thanks a ton aadi!!
-
dude aadi why did ya do 4/0.4 instead of 1.5/0.4???
they had asked resistance for lamp!!
u did for the whole thing!!
-
i too did it that way, because resistance of lamp is asked. i saw the markscheme it says 4/0.4
i too think it shud be 1.5/.4
astar may help?
-
i guess cuz 1.5 V is marked on d lamp its not supplied ...
4V is supplied to d circuit so 4 volts will be taken nd not 1.5
-
mabir dont argue for the sake!!
they are telling to find resistance for lamp not the whole thing!!!
read the q carefully!!!
-
the current flowing throught the circuit is same, so v can take 0.4A
but the voltage is different in series circuit, so it shudhere its only asked for the lamp, so it shud be 1.5/0.4
-
Can som1 plz tell me wen 2 use sin r/sin i instead of sin i /sin r to calculate the refractive index?
u know what it wuold be even better if u use the formula
n1sin1=n2sin2
instead of the above....cuz u will never go wrong wid this...
-
hey toxic this question from which year!!
i am being too ,lazy to go back and see it!!
we can check the ms if possible!!
-
u know what it wuold be even better if u use the formula
n1sin1=n2sin2
instead of the above....cuz u will never go wrong wid this...
adi, dont ignore the q, wat do u think it shud be 1.5/0.4 rite?
-
im not arguing ... ;D
but i guess dat cud be d only possible reason ...
read d first part .. d wire nd lamp is connected to 4V supply ...
d lamp is marked with ... 1.5V nd 0.6W ...
nd ms says 10ohms 4/0.4 = 10
-
oh sorry i thought that question was over..will be back in 2 mins wid my ans
-
dude!!
it is for the whole thing!!
and also in series the voltage changes!!
so i guess it must be 1.5 only!!
-
i will reach home in some time.....which paper ?
-
a)
P=IV
I=P/V=0.4 A
b)
R=V/I=1.5/0.4=3.75 ohms
c)
Q=It=0.4*20=8C
all's well...what's the problem you guys are having in the question??
-
dude, if it was that easy, we wont be arguing here, lol :P check the ms, its 4/0.4
-
u have the ms???
its not on fep..plss check nd let me know too
-
the markscheme's answer is 10 ohms y??? ???
-
dude, if it was that easy, we wont be arguing here, lol :P check the ms, its 4/0.4
check d quoted post
-
how come??
didnt get it>???
-
the markscheme's answer is 10 ohms y??? ???
how do u say that it is 10 ohms moon???????
-
Here is the answer direct from d mark scheme.
-
which paper??
-
thanks for that wassup....
now all i think is that there can be an error in the ms too...
cuz what we are doing is the right method!!
-
which paper??
june 2001 Q8>>>
-
june 2001
-
june 2001 Q8>>>
thank u....m back home.....ill check..
-
guys we are right yaar...it cant be the way ms is showing it...
see it's taking V as 4 volts whereas the lamp does not get the complete 4V....it cannot be like this...our answer is right!!!!!
-
yes d ms is wrong
-
k np!!
i stil did not get why 4/0.4!!????
wat if ms is wrong!! ;)
-
fep doesnt have theat paper. Do you have a copy?
-
ya it has been attached!!
di toxic attach it here agin for sir!!
-
ya sir ..here it is
-
here it is
-
bas bas!!!
chil maro yaar!!
do baar nahin ek baar thik tha!!
-
a)p=VI for the lamp I=P/V=0.6/1.5=0.4A
b)Use V=IR for the lamp 1.5=0.4*R so R=1.5/0.4=3.75ohms did everyone get this wrong?
c)Q=It=0.4*20=8C
-
sir we are all getting the same answers...but the ms says that the resistance part is 10 ohms...dts the problem!!!
-
yes It has to be 1.5 V when they ask specifically abt the lamp
-
now we come to the point!!
ms is wrong again!!!
-
dts exactly wat m saying duide...its wrong!!!
-
now we get something right!!
but is it 1.5 or 4!??
i still feel it must be 1.5!!!
-
it's an old paper guys.....it may be wrong....let's wait for astar to confirm it
even i'd go for 1.5V/0.4
-
which part are u toking about rite now???
-
now we come to the point!!
ms is wrong again!!!
By the way does evry1 knw that this ms is not written by cie, the qs r solved by the person who made this document. so it is very likely that the person can be wrong. i did the maths papers of 1993-2003 and in one q that guy got an ans wrong so dnt go exactly by what this ms says
-
which part are u toking about rite now???
the same damn resistance thingy
-
good information though!!!
-
are u sure cooldude dt this one is also of the same kind of ms solved by som1??
-
can ne1 plz help me with these q's
mj03 q4b, q9
mj02 q9a
thanks in adv.
-
it'd be gr8 if u cud post the questionshere plss....
-
4b is like you hav to do it with ratio propotion!!!
like 2*105:80::x:25!!
solve for x you'll get the ans!!
-
ms is wrong The resistnce of the whole circuit is 10 ohms
-
I just spotted I passed 6000 posts.
-
4b is like you hav to do it with ratio propotion!!!
like 2*105:85::x:25!!
solve for x you'll get the ans!!
ya i know this but the ans is 64 in d ms n by this method d ans is coming out 2 b 62500 Pa.???
-
it'd be gr8 if u cud post the questionshere plss....
u can see d q's here:
mj02 http://www.freeexampapers.us/IGCSE/Physics/CIE/2002%20Jun/0625_s02_qp_3.pdf
mj03 http://www.freeexampapers.us/IGCSE/Physics/CIE/2003%20Jun/0625_s03_qp_3.pdf
-
I just spotted I passed 6000 posts.
congrats ;D
-
9)ai) power=VI=24*2=48W!!
ii) power1=power2 so 48=0.4x!!
solve for x x=120 volts!!
b)i) the transformer being 100% efficient means that power in primary is eaul to power in secondary!! it converts all the elcerticity withouht ne or less wastage!!
ms:no/very little energy/power lost or energy/power in =
energy/power out
ii)ms:any mention of magnetic field
changing magnetic field
field passes through core or secondary coil
induces voltage in secondary coil
number of turns on secondary determines voltage
output
-
mj02 q9a
connect the 1 volt supply to Y's of CRO then measure the readings!!
the maximum value is 1!!
acc. mark the sacle!!
-
9)ai) power=VI=24*2=48W!!
ii) power1=power2 so 48=0.4x!!
solve for x x=120 volts!!
b)i) the transformer being 100% efficient means that power in primary is eaul to power in secondary!! it converts all the elcerticity withouht ne or less wastage!!
ms:no/very little energy/power lost or energy/power in =
energy/power out
ii)ms:any mention of magnetic field
changing magnetic field
field passes through core or secondary coil
induces voltage in secondary coil
number of turns on secondary determines voltage
output
sorry fr this but i wnted 2 know d ans fr 6th question of mj03.
-
np i'll do it and tell ya within short time!!
-
june 2001 Q8>>>
At last found the correct answer!!!!! Thanx 4 answering. :) :) :) :)
-
np i'll do it and tell ya within short time!!
thanks but can u explain d mj02 q9 properly plzzzzzzzz???
-
here it is!!
i have tried to to it!!
hope you get it!!
-
thanks shrey nd can u explain mj02 q9 properly n check d ans for mj03 q4b ??? ???
-
which paper?
-
y wats it??
i guess it is better if you do this for 4b
volume*pressure=k!!
so 2*105*80=k
so now new volume =k/25
= 2*105*80/25
=6.4*105
hope ya get it!!
-
thanks but can u explain d mj02 q9 properly plzzzzzzzz???
just put the connections in y input!!
dc gives you the max value that is 1V
mark the max value as 1V and then half as 0.5!!
and so on!!
-
y wats it??
i guess it is better if you do this for 4b
volume*pressure=k!!
so 2*105*80=k
so now new volume =k/25
= 2*105*80/25
=6.4*105
hope ya get it!!
i did this only but the ans in d ms is 64 ??? ??? ???
i know how 2 do it. just wanted 2 know how is it 64 or is d ms wrong again?
-
direct form ms!!
no editing:
(b) any attempt to use p x v = constant or correct
proportion
fraction 2 x 80/25 seen
p = 6.4 x 10 (Pa)
-
direct form ms!!
no editing:
(b) any attempt to use p x v = constant or correct
proportion
fraction 2 x 80/25 seen
p = 6.4 x 10 (Pa)
i guess they have missed 6.4 *105
this is the true ans!!
i guess the ms is wrong again!!!
-
hey wassup...the answer is 64 * 10^5 Pa
the ms has misprinted nd forgotten to add 5 there
-
ok thanks ppl
-
hey wassup check this out, direct from the er:
Question 4
(a) The confusion between particles and molecules was less common than with previous questions on
this topic. However there were considerable numbers of candidates who thought that the dust
particles were “lighter than the heavy air molecules”. Many answers were spoilt by extending this
wrong concept to “fast moving dust particles colliding with air molecules”. However, there were
many excellent answers seen.
(b) Large numbers of fully correct answers were seen, generally well set out and with all the working
shown. The most common error was the use of 2 x 25/80 instead of 2 x 80/25.
Answer: (b) 6.4 x 105 Pa.
-
thats wat i have told earlir!!!
-
hey wassup check this out, direct from the er:
Question 4
(a) The confusion between particles and molecules was less common than with previous questions on
this topic. However there were considerable numbers of candidates who thought that the dust
particles were “lighter than the heavy air molecules”. Many answers were spoilt by extending this
wrong concept to “fast moving dust particles colliding with air molecules”. However, there were
many excellent answers seen.
(b) Large numbers of fully correct answers were seen, generally well set out and with all the working
shown. The most common error was the use of 2 x 25/80 instead of 2 x 80/25.
Answer: (b) 6.4 x 105 Pa.
thanks adi
-
anytime wassup!!
-
do we need to know the formulas for paper 3?
-
of course. its a theory paper. u have to know everything.
-
of course u need to!!!!!!!!!!! :o :o
-
could anyone explain wat's charles law?? :S
-
could anyone explain wat's charles law?? :S
charles law is when pressure is constant for an ideal gas the volume is directly proportional to the absolute temperature
-
chrles law is something to do wih pressure and volume and temp!!
u dont take tension just remmeber that:
volume is directly propotional to temp
and presure is inversley to volume!!
-
Charles law states that >> the volume of a fixed mass of gas is directly proportional to its absolute temperature when pressure is kept constant.