Author Topic: physics  (Read 19298 times)

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
physics
« on: March 24, 2010, 10:52:20 am »
A measurement of 327.66ms-1 accurate to 3%
which of the following gives her result expressed to the appropriate no of significant figures?
a) 327.7 b)328 c)330 d)300

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2010, 11:03:39 am »
the current in a resistor is marked as (2.50+/-0.05)mA
the resistor is marked as 4.7 +/- 2% ohms
if these values were used to calculate the power dissipated what is the percentage uncertanity
a) 2% b) 4% c)6% d) 8%

Offline A.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation: 271
Re: physics
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2010, 11:10:35 am »
the current in a resistor is marked as (2.50+/-0.05)mA
the resistor is marked as 4.7 +/- 2% ohms
if these values were used to calculate the power dissipated what is the percentage uncertanity
a) 2% b) 4% c)6% d) 8%

For resistance the percentage uncertainity is given which is 2%
For current u can find it by 0.05/2.5 * 100 = 2%
The formula is P=I^2 * R
so we'll multiply the current's uncertainity by 2 which will give 4%
now add both % uncertainities = 4+2=6%
hence answer is C
« Last Edit: March 24, 2010, 11:28:03 am by A.T »

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2010, 11:13:28 am »
but current is given a mA we dont take the 'm' into account here?
and dont u have to find the fractional uncertanity for both and add them?

Offline A.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation: 271
Re: physics
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2010, 11:30:05 am »
but current is given a mA we dont take the 'm' into account here?
and dont u have to find the fractional uncertanity for both and add them?
For uncertainity u dont have to count the milli but for findind the actual power u will need to count it.
The simplest way to find the % uncertainity is find the % unc. of all the variables and add then so there is no neeed to find fractional unc.

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2010, 11:33:47 am »
thnkx this actually makes sense  :)

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2010, 11:58:57 am »
the ans to the first question is c 330ms-1...
any ideas

Offline astarmathsandphysics

  • SF Overlord
  • *********
  • Posts: 11271
  • Reputation: 65534
  • Gender: Male
  • Free the exam papers!
Re: physics
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2010, 02:08:48 pm »
Because 330 is in the range 327.66 -3% to 327.66+3%

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2010, 02:15:59 pm »
thnkx :D

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #9 on: March 24, 2010, 02:43:23 pm »
A balloon is ascending with a uniform vertical velocity of 10ms-1.when at a height of 600m above the ground. A stone is dropped from it.
how long does the stone take to strike the ground?
with what velocity does the stone strike the ground

ASAP please
thnkx

Offline A.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation: 271
Re: physics
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2010, 05:49:55 pm »
Because 330 is in the range 327.66 -3% to 327.66+3%
Arent all the values in that range?
i dont think this is the correct logic.

« Last Edit: March 24, 2010, 06:06:44 pm by A.T »

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2010, 05:54:34 pm »
an arrow is shot horizontally at a target 20m away.The arrow hits a point 19.6cm verically below the point it was aimed at.Calculate the speed with which the arrow left the bow.


could someone please explain this and the above questions...urgently!!!! ???

Offline astarmathsandphysics

  • SF Overlord
  • *********
  • Posts: 11271
  • Reputation: 65534
  • Gender: Male
  • Free the exam papers!
Re: physics
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2010, 08:44:00 pm »
y=1/2at^2
0.196=4.9t^2 so t=0.2 seconmd
v=x/t=20/0.2 =100m/s

Offline ruby92

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
  • Reputation: 258
Re: physics
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2010, 09:48:21 pm »
hw did u get 4.9 as the acceleration

Offline A.T

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Reputation: 271
Re: physics
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2010, 10:19:59 pm »
hw did u get 4.9 as the acceleration
9.81/2
9.81 = g