« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22   Go Down

Author Topic: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!  (Read 32781 times)

Offline Ghost Of Highbury

  • O_o_O lala!
  • SF Farseer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4096
  • Reputation: 41428
  • Gender: Male
  • Namaskaram!
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #300 on: June 09, 2009, 03:17:01 pm »
for using what???
in the exam??
Logged
divine intervention!

Offline XGhostX

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Reputation: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #301 on: June 09, 2009, 03:18:45 pm »
I wrote mm Ruler as an answer in the first question  :-\
Logged
XD

Offline Ghost Of Highbury

  • O_o_O lala!
  • SF Farseer
  • *******
  • Posts: 4096
  • Reputation: 41428
  • Gender: Male
  • Namaskaram!
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #302 on: June 09, 2009, 03:19:41 pm »
if its the may/june 2009 exam u r talking abt

sorry but i didnt give that exam

hope it is correct... :)
Logged
divine intervention!

Offline XGhostX

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Reputation: 0
  • Gender: Male
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #303 on: June 09, 2009, 03:34:02 pm »
 :D Thanks
Logged
XD

Offline Omenbreed898

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
  • Reputation: -4
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #304 on: June 09, 2009, 03:37:18 pm »
can sum1 explain thermal capacity(high and low)
Logged

Offline susman

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 110
  • Reputation: -5
  • Gender: Male
    • Usman Website
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #305 on: June 10, 2009, 05:27:53 am »
high thermal capacity means that
more amount of energy would be needed to change the temptertature of a body by 1degreed

for example
2 kg of aluminium has less thermal capacity than 2 kg of water...
aluminium loosoes and gains temperature faster than water..
thus the low thermal capacity
in this case water has high thermal capacity

IMHO it actually depepends on the mass
in the question
BEST OF LUCK everybody
Logged

Offline thukon

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
  • Reputation: 128
  • Gender: Male
  • Blah
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #306 on: June 10, 2009, 10:36:01 am »
thermal capacity can be different for 2 objects of the same material, but different masses. Its SPECIFIC heat capacity that has to be same for similar materials.
Logged

Offline AndrewCedric

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 88
  • Reputation: 157
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #307 on: June 10, 2009, 11:04:42 am »
I got the Fraction 1/8..Cause u divide 1/2 the mass and the speed too..I'm pretty sure it correct but why the heck they gave us the diameter of the
thingy??the turbine or whatsoever? For the Diode I"M SURE 100% its A.I did the experiment in Sec3.

For the PD ACROSS S WHEN THE SWITCH IS Open is 0 volt and the same goes for the next question.

Pressure should not be halved for the swimming pool thing.

FOR THE MICROMETER, you should mention Datum line, ratchet and thimble..Well, that my opinion..

Wow Wahab09..You're good!
Logged

Offline persian17

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
  • Reputation: 0
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #308 on: June 10, 2009, 11:54:48 am »
^ the pressure of water at that point remains unchanged as the density, height and g are the same=> pressure= d x h x g.......
Logged

Offline Feva

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 54
  • Reputation: 5
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #309 on: June 10, 2009, 02:07:54 pm »
Phys paper1 isnt THAAAATT easy.. so be prepared.. ^^
Logged

Offline thukon

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
  • Reputation: 128
  • Gender: Male
  • Blah
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #310 on: June 10, 2009, 02:29:40 pm »
Physics paper 1 was soooo easy!!!  ;D
I might even get full!!
Im amazed at some of the people's mistake. They kinda fell prey to CIE's tricks.
Logged

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #311 on: June 10, 2009, 03:04:26 pm »
physics ppr 1 was okay ppl!! dont freak out!....just be carefull....they have some tricks in it....
Logged

Offline esso

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
  • Reputation: 25
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #312 on: June 10, 2009, 03:16:18 pm »
Quote from: XGhostX on June 09, 2009, 03:14:14 pm
I Just wanna Ask.......Is mm Ruler correct ???
 :P

tell u wat....i wrote the same... ithink its correct.....cause mm ruler is so acurrate in mm
Logged

Offline MissDE

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 227
  • Reputation: 105
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #313 on: June 10, 2009, 03:20:11 pm »
wat abt ppr1
r we allowed to discuss it now?
Logged

Offline leebux101

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 2966
Re: Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!
« Reply #314 on: June 10, 2009, 03:21:22 pm »
Quote from: DE on June 10, 2009, 03:20:11 pm
wat abt ppr1
r we allowed to discuss it now?
u r probably gna be able to discuss it tomorow...cuz 24 hrs will be over then....how did u do anyway??
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22   Go Up
« previous next »