Author Topic: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion  (Read 24316 times)

....

  • Guest
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #180 on: June 02, 2009, 07:15:21 pm »
what i think was that the value of the height had nothing to do with the volume, since height was in mm, and volume in cm3. I just remember that, 18 cm3 of aqueous nitrate of T, reacted with 2 cm3 portions of a solution of Na3PO4. The maximum precipitate of the phosphate of T, was reached at 6 cm3 of sodium phosphate. Since both had the same concentration, it didnt really matter, the main thing that mattered was the volume then. Now, we have that the volume of the nitrate of T used was 18, and that of the sodium phosphate was 6. so volume ratio of the nitrate reactant to the phosphate reactant is 18:6 = 3:1, which is also the mole ratio. So if we construct an ionic equation using the mole ratio, we can get ...

PO43-  +  3T+  ---->  T3PO4

when i came home, i opened june 2004 paper 3, of chem, where i remember seeing a similar graph as the one given in the question..

in the june 2004 q, 4 cm3 of aqueous iron (III) chloride, reacts with 2cm^3 portions of aqueous sodium hydroxide..according to the graph..the maximum volume of sodium hydroxide at which the maximum precipitate is formed, is at 12 cm^3..

thus the volume ratio of the chloride reactant to the hydroxide, is 4:12 = 1:3
That means, there will be one Fe3+ ion for every 3 OH- ions..according to the ratio..

the next part of the given is..complete the following reaction..

Fe3+   +   .....OH-  -----> ...........

since ratio is 1:3..itll be 3 OH- forms Fe(OH)2..
the concentration of both reactants is 1moldm-3 which is given..

so the questions are quite similar..and so, i think T3PO4

i dont consider myself a genius, just mixxing familiar stuff with unfamiliar stuff.

....

  • Guest
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #181 on: June 02, 2009, 07:17:11 pm »
sorry...that is Fe(OH)3

Offline Shogun

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 495
  • Reputation: 25
  • Gender: Male
  • the heavens cry within the arrival of the best
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #182 on: June 02, 2009, 07:18:15 pm »
it wasnt OH in tht fe thing it was some halogen i think, im100% sure it wasnt OH in the fill in the blanks stuff for tht ionic reaction. however ure explaination is good.
one who masters both the pen and paper is indeed a true warrior.

\m/metal head\m/

....

  • Guest
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #183 on: June 02, 2009, 07:23:30 pm »
i just rechecked it..and it is aqueous sodium hydroxide, and aqueous iron (III) chloride..as the reactants..:S

Offline shafiq_92libra

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 238
  • Reputation: 478
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #184 on: June 02, 2009, 07:38:38 pm »
At da cathod(da negativ electrod) u gt H2+ ions atraced n dey giv H2 gas at cathod. At da anode wich is positiv, da negtiv ions dat r Cl- ions r atracted n dey giv off Cl2 gas. A solution of NaOH is left behind ;D
« Last Edit: June 02, 2009, 09:01:44 pm by shafiq_92libra »
Manifest Destiny

Offline MaNa

  • SF Overlord
  • *********
  • Posts: 10219
  • Reputation: 15789
  • Gender: Female
  • InV!ncIbl3!!!!!!
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #185 on: June 02, 2009, 08:01:59 pm »
heY everYone,
wat about electrolysis of dilute sodium chloride???
Cathode..........
anode..............
and wat happens to the electrolyte???.....
WaiTinG 4 uR RepLies!!xD!!
at da cathode it was h2
at anode it was o2
so conc. NaCl was left
NOPE its was concentrated NaCl
therefore @ anode Cl would be depsoed no O2
All ur dreams are made,when you're changed to a mirror and the razor blade!!!

Offline IO4567

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Reputation: 15
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #186 on: June 02, 2009, 08:58:57 pm »
no... im pretty sure it said dilute sodium chloride

Offline esso

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
  • Reputation: 25
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #187 on: June 02, 2009, 10:02:07 pm »
properties of Cao
did it come....cause i think there is diffrent papers

Offline ~M.J~

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
  • Reputation: 20
  • Gender: Male
  • High Altitude Is My Attitude
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #188 on: June 02, 2009, 10:19:19 pm »
Guyz...
a bad news
test 4 carboxylic acis is not litmus ppr
the question was to give a test to show that it contains -COOH ions
i searched the net
googled "test 4 carboxylic acid Chemistry" n got the ans.

Test: add water then add sodium hydrogen carbonate
Result: Fizzing and a white ppt. at the bottom

This test is specifically for carboxylic acids and i think they asked this one
not the little litmus paper....... :( :( :(

....

  • Guest
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #189 on: June 02, 2009, 10:48:46 pm »
properties of CaO came in the way, that the ionic structure we had to draw was originally calcium oxide, so we had to tell its properties..

and, about organic acids..i think syllabus specifies that we have to know about ehtanoic acid as a typical weak acid..and so..TYPICAL weak ACID, means, that it reacts in the same way with litmus, metal carbonates, hydroxides, oxides, and even metal themselves as mineral acids..well..when we have to test for an acid, we guys used to use the carbonate test, effervescence occurs, and the gas produced turns limewater milky...what about the rest of you??

Offline ~M.J~

  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
  • Reputation: 20
  • Gender: Male
  • High Altitude Is My Attitude
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #190 on: June 02, 2009, 10:55:31 pm »
I just can't  understand why the CIE nutshells wrote "to show the -COOH"
y not just "to show that they r week acids"

....

  • Guest
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #191 on: June 02, 2009, 11:03:00 pm »
lol..maybe thts a way to make sure the candidate even knows that -COOH is for a carboxylic acid..
well..what did you write for this acid test?

Offline thukon

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
  • Reputation: 128
  • Gender: Male
  • Blah
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #192 on: June 03, 2009, 03:17:26 am »
For the COOH thingy, i wrote add and alcohol and an ester should form :-\ Its a long shot i know, but at least its a test to show that they have the COOH group and not just to show that they are acids.

Offline aquarian93

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
  • Reputation: 6
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #193 on: June 03, 2009, 03:48:18 am »
which question was "to show a test to distinguish b/w the two?"
one had a double bond so i did add Bromine, and it would decoulirise unlike the other, forgot which question it was.


and guys, how much is the boundary for an A? does anyone noe?

Offline thukon

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 250
  • Reputation: 128
  • Gender: Male
  • Blah
Re: IG Chemistry Paper 3 discussion
« Reply #194 on: June 03, 2009, 03:57:46 am »
which question was "to show a test to distinguish b/w the two?"
one had a double bond so i did add Bromine, and it would decoulirise unlike the other, forgot which question it was.


and guys, how much is the boundary for an A? does anyone noe?
I wrote the same thing. Shake with bromine water.