Author Topic: How was Bio paper 1 :D  (Read 5082 times)

Offline hesho21

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Reputation: 72
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2010, 06:58:30 pm »
i believe thresholds gonna be low due to practical nd a bit cuz of p1 but damn p2 rockd !!

Agree , but u know I stopped thinking about thresholds , cuz it'll just keep u worrying , the most important thing is that u have achieved ure best , hopefully :)

Offline princesszahra

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Reputation: 104
  • Gender: Female
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2010, 07:01:58 pm »
my paper went good!
apne ghamon ki yun numaish na kar
apne naseeb ki yun azmaish na kar
jo tera hai teray dar pe khud aye ga
roz use pane ki khuwahish na kar

Offline hesho21

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Reputation: 72
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2010, 09:08:19 pm »
my paper went good!

that's gd to hear :D

Offline thomas234

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Reputation: 19
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2010, 10:05:00 pm »
There were a few recycled questions but there were some tricky questions also. Hope the grade threshold is gonna be like 30/40 for an A.

Offline unknown 101

  • SF Joker
  • SF Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
  • Reputation: 5946
  • Gender: Male
  • FEELING GREATER THAN EVERR :D
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #19 on: May 26, 2010, 10:07:00 pm »
There were a few recycled questions but there were some tricky questions also. Hope the grade threshold is gonna be like 30/40 for an A.

yeah  i hope so to, but i think its gonna be 33/40, cuz not all the questions were hard

Offline thomas234

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Reputation: 19
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #20 on: May 26, 2010, 10:22:12 pm »
Cool
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 04:51:25 pm by Ari Ben Canaan »

Offline unknown 101

  • SF Joker
  • SF Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
  • Reputation: 5946
  • Gender: Male
  • FEELING GREATER THAN EVERR :D
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #21 on: May 26, 2010, 10:24:35 pm »

i would tell u but then i will get banned ;)
soo...

dont discuss content of the exam untill 24hrs are done
« Last Edit: May 27, 2010, 04:51:45 pm by Ari Ben Canaan »

Offline thomas234

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Reputation: 19
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #22 on: May 26, 2010, 10:30:24 pm »
Its been 24 hours since I sat the exam :P (NZ here)

Offline unknown 101

  • SF Joker
  • SF Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
  • Reputation: 5946
  • Gender: Male
  • FEELING GREATER THAN EVERR :D
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #23 on: May 26, 2010, 10:35:19 pm »
Its been 24 hours since I sat the exam :P (NZ here)

well i guess u will have to wait another 24 hrs :P

Offline Ukhti-R

  • Striving for Jannah
  • Honorary Member
  • SF Overlord
  • *****
  • Posts: 11270
  • Reputation: 65535
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #24 on: May 26, 2010, 10:49:42 pm »
i would tell u but then i will get banned ;)
soo...

dont discuss content of the exam untill 24hrs are done

Thanks Unknown101.
"...And whosoever fears Allah and keeps his duty to Him, He will make a a way for him to get out (from every difficulty). And He will provide him from (sources) he never could imagine. And whosoever puts his trust in Allah, then He will suffice him." [65: 2-3]

Freaked12

  • Guest
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #25 on: May 26, 2010, 10:58:15 pm »
Thanks Unknown101.

This is getting way to complicated.
the reason CIE shifted the timings from 9 am to 11 am and from 1 pm to 3pm for afternoon session is that most almost all of the exams around the world end at this period of time.
i Just saw the newsletter today infront of the examination hall

Offline Worriyo

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • Reputation: 120
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #26 on: May 27, 2010, 06:38:19 am »
i think the paper wasnt THAT easy as all of you say.. really tricky..if you didnt read properly easy marks would have been lost...
anyways i have several questions ...

what did u guys write for questions 1-3

and what about the 2 questions concerning the heart... one with the electircal impulse diagram nd the other talking about the a heart disease in which the semi lunar valve where damaged or something like that...

also there was a question about seive tube elements in photosynthesising plants and in actively growing roots... ??
finally... question 40..???

if you guys could answer my questions above that would be more than great....   :)

Offline [Spy]

  • SF Joker (2)
  • SF Geek
  • ****
  • Posts: 532
  • Reputation: 750
  • Gender: Male
  • Watch Your Back.
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #27 on: May 27, 2010, 10:15:33 am »
i think the paper wasnt THAT easy as all of you say.. really tricky..if you didnt read properly easy marks would have been lost...
anyways i have several questions ...

what did u guys write for questions 1-3

and what about the 2 questions concerning the heart... one with the electircal impulse diagram nd the other talking about the a heart disease in which the semi lunar valve where damaged or something like that...

also there was a question about seive tube elements in photosynthesising plants and in actively growing roots... ??
finally... question 40..???

if you guys could answer my questions above that would be more than great....   :)

1. D (xylem then nucleolous then ribosome.

2. C (you cant see the ER because they are very close to each other and light microscope has low resolution)

3. i put A, i dont know if its right. though i know its either A or C

question about heart it was P and T

for the valve one i put A about tendons, but alot of people put C.

for the seive tube question it was low water potential and sucrose leaving.

and q40. it was B as i remember. same community and same trophic level, NOT same habitat and NOT same niche.

:D
Kids in back seats cause accidents, accidents in back seats cause kids.
David Guetta<3
Student Forum<3

Offline Worriyo

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • Reputation: 120
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #28 on: May 27, 2010, 01:34:19 pm »
1. D (xylem then nucleolous then ribosome.

2. C (you cant see the ER because they are very close to each other and light microscope has low resolution)

3. i put A, i dont know if its right. though i know its either A or C

question about heart it was P and T

for the valve one i put A about tendons, but alot of people put C.

for the seive tube question it was low water potential and sucrose leaving.

and q40. it was B as i remember. same community and same trophic level, NOT same habitat and NOT same niche.

:D


thx alot man :D
really helper me out here....
what other difficult questions where there ??

Offline Ykov

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • Reputation: 31
Re: How was Bio paper 1 :D
« Reply #29 on: May 27, 2010, 02:08:16 pm »
I put sucrose entering the roots rather than leaving simply because the leaves are usually the source, where glucose is converted to sucrose and carried to the sink, usually storage organs or organs that are actively respiring and growing such as the fruits, the roots and the apical stems and in this case, they mentioned actively growing roots. Yeah, water potential is low because of mass flow and also increasing sucrose concentrations.