IGCSE/GCSE/O & A Level/IB/University Student Forum

Qualification => Subject Doubts => GCE AS & A2 Level => Math => Topic started by: spiderman on September 21, 2009, 02:44:17 pm

Title: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 21, 2009, 02:44:17 pm
1) A piece of wire 24 cm long ha sthe shape of a rectangle. Given that the width is w cm, show that the area A cm^2, of the rectangle is given by the function A=36-(6-w)^2. Find the greatest possible domain and the corresponding range of this function in this context.

2)Rewrite these sentences using correct inequality signs

    *) In an orchard the trees had between 300 to 400 pears on each tree.
      im confused (should it be, 300<=p<400 or 300<=p<=400)
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on September 21, 2009, 02:57:55 pm
I am not in for the next 4  hours. Will answer it when i get back.
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 03:00:42 pm
1) A piece of wire 4 cm long ha sthe shape of a rectangle. Given that the width is w cm, show that the area A cm^2, of the rectangle is given by the function A=36-(6-w)^2. Find the greatest possible domain and the corresponding range of this function in this context.

2)Rewrite these sentences using correct inequality signs

    *) In an orchard the trees had between 300 to 400 pears on each tree.
      im confused (should it be, 300<=p<400 or 300<=p<=400)

spidey, which page in the textbook is this question from??

adi has answered the 2nd question right...
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 21, 2009, 03:33:54 pm
page no 36
qp 12
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 03:48:31 pm
gimme a few minutes...i'll do it
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:12:42 pm
I got the part where you need to find the domain and the range but i don't  get how to show the Area is 36-(6-w)^2

I'll put down the other part tho.....but u must wait till astar confirms the answer
We need to evaluate the equation for any real number....but area cannot have a negative value, so can't w
so
36-(6-w)^2>0
36-(6-w)^2<24w(it's 24m..u made a typo)
so this gives us...
0<w<12 domain

After that you try finding values of A between values of w 1-11
you'll notice
0<A<36 is the range....

if you didn't get it...i don't mind explaining it again....
I'll try figuring out the proving part too...
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 21, 2009, 04:24:25 pm
proving part

lenght = x

width = w

wx = area

2w + 2x = 24

2x = 24 - 2w

x = 12 - w

area = wx = 12w - w2

----------
36 - (6-w)2 = 36 - (36 - 12w + w2)

==> 36  - 36 +12w -w2
= 12w - w2

-----------
done..
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:29:34 pm
why did u take
2w+2x=24
this means twice width + twice length= length....can u explain this
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 21, 2009, 04:31:15 pm
I got the part where you need to find the domain and the range but i don't  get how to show the Area is 36-(6-w)^2

I'll put down the other part tho.....but u must wait till astar confirms the answer
We need to evaluate the equation for any real number....but area cannot have a negative value, so can't w
so
36-(6-w)^2>0
36-(6-w)^2<24w(it's 24m..u made a typo)
so this gives us...
0<w<12 domain

After that you try finding values of A between values of w 1-11
you'll notice
0<A<36 is the range....

if you didn't get it...i don't mind explaining it again....
I'll try figuring out the proving part too...

the domain part can also be explained this way

first simplify 36-(6-w)^2 ==> 12w - w2

the area has to be greater than 0

thus, 12w - w2 > 0

12w > w2

w2 < 12w

w < 12

therefore..........0<w<12

-------------------------------------
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 21, 2009, 04:32:29 pm
why did u take
2w+2x=24
this means twice width + twice length= length....can u explain this

the length of the wire = 24 ...

therefore the permieter of the rectangle is also = 24

perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length) + 2(width) = 2x + 2w = 2w + 2x

thus, 2w + 2x =24
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: master786 on September 21, 2009, 04:35:16 pm
ok wait so spidermans questiontyped is rong ?
its not 4cm long its 24cm long ?
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:36:06 pm
the length of the wire = 24 ...

therefore the permieter of the rectangle is also = 24

perimeter of a rectangle = 2(length) + 2(width) = 2x + 2w = 2w + 2x

thus, 2w + 2x =24

how can the length of the wire be equal to the perimeter??

Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:36:33 pm
ok wait so spidermans questiontyped is rong ?
its not 4cm long its 24cm long ?

yup
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: master786 on September 21, 2009, 04:38:15 pm
its not the lenghth of the wire ..
its how long the wire is totally nd this 24cm when madeinto a rectangle has a length nd width which is unkown to us :)
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 21, 2009, 04:38:46 pm
how can the length of the wire be equal to the perimeter??



ok..suppose...u take a 30cm wire...fold it to make a circle...a triangle...a square...whatever,,.,doesnt matter


u havent added any extra wire nor have u removed a part of the wire....the perimeter will be equal to the length of wire taken rite?

dont confuse it with the area....u'm talking abt the perimeter....

Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:40:11 pm
okk...my bad.....i took it differently....i thought the wire is not cylindrical but rectangular....

got it...it's a 24cm wire, made into a rectangle


then ok...sorry my bad
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: master786 on September 21, 2009, 04:41:43 pm
yes :D
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 21, 2009, 04:47:31 pm
i'm not pretty sure of the second part..

but..i strongly think that it shud be --> 300<p<400

because it says its BETWEEN the range...

Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: nid404 on September 21, 2009, 04:49:38 pm
i'm not pretty sure of the second part..

but..i strongly think that it shud be --> 300<p<400

because it says its BETWEEN the range...



that's what I know after doing inequalities from the text....u don't include the upper and lower bound when it says between
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on September 21, 2009, 07:25:54 pm
Thanks for all that. Looks as though this question is answered
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 22, 2009, 04:15:18 am
Hey thanks guys!!!!!
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 22, 2009, 12:18:09 pm
please can anyone help me with this sum

(x-3)^2 -3=0
Solve this quadratic function leaving surds in your answer.....
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 22, 2009, 12:32:42 pm
< = square root sign
------------------------------
first step - expand...

x2 - 6x + 9 -3 = 0

x2 -6x + 6 = 0

use the formula x = -b (+)<b2 - 4ac
                           -----------------------------      
                                            2a

and..                   x = -b (-)<b2 - 4ac
                           -----------------------------
                                            2a

simplify...

6 +<(36-24)
------------ = 6 +<12
        2          -------
                         2

=> 3 + (<12/2)

and 3 - (<12/2)

------------------

<12 represents the answer in surd form...
------
<12/2 can be written as (<3*4)/2 = (<3 * <4)/2 = (<3 *2)/2 = <3

-----

so the final answer is 3(+/-) <3

Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 22, 2009, 12:35:18 pm
find a ppt attached...it has the surd form thingy...
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 22, 2009, 12:44:06 pm
but the answer in the text is 3+-square root of 3....
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 22, 2009, 12:46:24 pm
but the answer in the text is 3+-square root of 3....
its the same dude....<12/2 is further simplified as +-<3
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on September 22, 2009, 12:47:23 pm
please can anyone help me with this sum

(x-3)^2 -3=0
Solve this quadratic function leaving surds in your answer.....

Make x the subject

1. Add 3 to both sides

(x-3)^2 =3

2. Square root

(x-3)=\pm sqrt(3)

3. Add 3 to both sides.

==3\pm sqrt(3)
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 22, 2009, 12:49:06 pm
its the same dude....<12/2 is further simplified as +-<3

modified the answer....check again,...

simplified <12/2 to <3

:)
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 22, 2009, 12:49:54 pm
Thanks astar and eddie.......
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: spiderman on September 22, 2009, 01:09:34 pm
hey guys does anyone know where will i get the checkpoint math past papers for the years 2006-2009
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: Ghost Of Highbury on September 22, 2009, 01:12:32 pm
checkpoint?!?!?!?!,,,

u mean...the one before IGCSEs....lolz..

my juniors have been troubling me all day for those papers...its not dere in FEP....the CIE site also has 2005..


difficult to get them..
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on September 22, 2009, 01:35:58 pm
I dont know. I am looking for them.
Title: Re: maths again!!!
Post by: astarmathsandphysics on September 24, 2009, 10:40:50 pm
1, let p,with coorinates (p,q), be a fixed point on the 'curve ' with equation y=mx+c and let Q with coordinates (r,s), be any other point on y=mx+c . use the fact  thar the coordinates of p and Q satisfy the equation y=mx+c to  show that the gradient of PQ is m for all positions of Q.

2 there are some values of  a, b and c for which the equation ax+by+c=0 does not represent a straight line. give an example of such values

1)
3two lines have equations  y=m1x+c1 and y=m2x+c2 and m1m2=-1. prove that the lines are perpendicular.
(p,q) on y=mx+c so q=mp+c (1)
(r,s) on y=mx+c so s=mr+c   (2)

(1)-(2) gives q-s=m(p-r) so m=(q-s)/(p-r)

2) a=b=c=0. Any value of x and y satisfies the equation so the while x,y plane is the solution