IGCSE/GCSE/O & A Level/IB/University Student Forum
Student Forum => Help, Complaints and Suggestions. => Topic started by: crypsAnity on June 08, 2009, 04:35:40 pm
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you find it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. u are indeed .. lifeless?
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you fing it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. NO comments.. lol
Lets go on a strike to get her bak LOL ;D
No for racism no for unfair banning in the student forums :P
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you fing it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. NO comments.. lol
Lets go on a strike to get her bak LOL ;D
No for racism no for unfair banning in the student forums :P
It is TOTALLY FAIR!!
-
I would like to know this too
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you fing it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. NO comments.. lol
Lets go on a strike to get her bak LOL ;D
No for racism no for unfair banning in the student forums :P
It is TOTALLY FAIR!!
HOWZ THT ??? >:(
-
exactly.. any of the mods it would be very nice if youd tell us why .. because ahahaha.. u dint even have a reason
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
I am not being a suck up!! wtf!!
Your freind started acting bossy infront of the ADMINS AND MODS, well she got what she deserves for being that, and plus this is a site for HELPING EACH OTHER NOT CHEATING AND NOT WASTING TIME BY LAM STUFF JUST LIKE WHAT UR FREIND DID!!
SOOO I THINK YOU SHOULD WATCH WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO!!! :@
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
I am not being a suck up!! wtf!!
Your freind started acting bossy infront of the ADMINS AND MODS, well she got what she deserves for being that, and plus this is a site for HELPING EACH OTHER NOT CHEATING AND NOT WASTING TIME BY LAM STUFF JUST LIKE WHAT UR FREIND DID!!
SOOO I THINK YOU SHOULD WATCH WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO!!! :@
lmao
as far as i knw
she was askin fr help ..
yes u r being a suck up ..
so shush!!
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
I am not being a suck up!! wtf!!
Your freind started acting bossy infront of the ADMINS AND MODS, well she got what she deserves for being that, and plus this is a site for HELPING EACH OTHER NOT CHEATING AND NOT WASTING TIME BY LAM STUFF JUST LIKE WHAT UR FREIND DID!!
SOOO I THINK YOU SHOULD WATCH WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO!!! :@
lmao
as far as i knw
she was askin fr help ..
yes u r being a suck up ..
so shush!!
trust me u better watch the way to talk to me
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
I am not being a suck up!! wtf!!
Your freind started acting bossy infront of the ADMINS AND MODS, well she got what she deserves for being that, and plus this is a site for HELPING EACH OTHER NOT CHEATING AND NOT WASTING TIME BY LAM STUFF JUST LIKE WHAT UR FREIND DID!!
SOOO I THINK YOU SHOULD WATCH WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO!!! :@
lmao
as far as i knw
she was askin fr help ..
yes u r being a suck up ..
so shush!!
trust me u better watch the way to talk to me
hmm yes rakan
who r u again ??? ;)
-
The reason Loco93 was banned was for extensive spamming, discussion of exam materials before 24 hours, abusing Moderators and Admins of the site.
They were warned once, and decided not to heed the advice given to them, and this is why more severe action was taken against them.
There is no need for aggression when posting. If you have a problem, please bring it up in a manner which is acceptable. Denouncing members of staff is not one of those acceptable manners.
-
Devil93 ...
get a life !!!
stop being such a suck up!!
I am not being a suck up!! wtf!!
Your freind started acting bossy infront of the ADMINS AND MODS, well she got what she deserves for being that, and plus this is a site for HELPING EACH OTHER NOT CHEATING AND NOT WASTING TIME BY LAM STUFF JUST LIKE WHAT UR FREIND DID!!
SOOO I THINK YOU SHOULD WATCH WHO YOU ARE TALKING TO!!! :@
lmao
as far as i knw
she was askin fr help ..
yes u r being a suck up ..
so shush!!
trust me u better watch the way to talk to me
hmm yes rakan
who r u again ??? ;)
you think i dont know that REHAM told you
look i swear you dont wana mess with me!! :@
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you find it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. u are indeed .. lifeless?
Finding something offensive is a subjective matter. It is not of my concern whether anyone was offended or not, however the aggressive nature of the posts were liable to causing offence to members of SF as well as the staff. That is why the topic was removed.
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you find it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. u are indeed .. lifeless?
Finding something offensive is a subjective matter. It is not of my concern whether anyone was offended or not, however the aggressive nature of the posts were liable to causing offence to members of SF as well as the staff. That is why the topic was removed.
fine thn
b as fair and unban her ...
-
Can we stop harassing and threatening each other please.
The rules are clear.
No discussion of Edexcel/CIE exams before a 24 hour delay.
No offensive material/posting towards other members (be it staff or not)
Loco93 broke both these rules more than once, and also caused a nuisance in the IGCSE Forum which was reported more than once.
-
i am going to do soo much to you trust me, you JUST DONT KNOW WHO I AM AND WHAT I CAN DO RIGHT FROM WHERE I AM!! :@
And i made a new account because the other one was deleted and not banned because its similar to Astar's so i had to make a new one!! and i came to help people, not like you! so i think you should see how Lifeless YOU are before talking about other people, and no one wants you to be like me, and it because u just cant hun!! so i guess u should stop ur hobby of ANNOYING people.
-
Ummm.. Id like to know.. why you banned Loco93 .. because apparently.. i dont think she did anything offensive??? or did you find it offensive? because if you did.. wow .. u are indeed .. lifeless?
Finding something offensive is a subjective matter. It is not of my concern whether anyone was offended or not, however the aggressive nature of the posts were liable to causing offence to members of SF as well as the staff. That is why the topic was removed.
fine thn
b as fair and unban her ...
I will consult other staff members.
We may reduce the ban from 'indefinitely banned' to a shorter time period such as 7 days.
-
Okayyyy .. I dont know what wrong with yall.. but I clearly remember her first topic.. she wasnt discussing the paper .. if i had it saved coulda put it down.. she was just stating the fact that there was something wrong with the question and peopel need to report it to cie.. and if this sint the place to discuss which else is it?.. and as far as i can remember she made her very best so tht ppl didnt discuss.. you could have indeed deleted the posts of the few people who did not listen to her.. but keep her thread as in whole.. but yall still deleted it.. making no sense or whatsoever.. besides her "agressive" attitude towards you was made after her first post was deleted.. that was simply a very natural comeback for anyone.. now think for a sec.. is it even justified? thats my point.. n id appreciate it very much if u clear it ..
-
Thank you past-papers for making this clear..Although i'm not the one who banned her it was the right dicission made by us
-
ummm.. excuse me . but can anyone like READ what i wrote and reply to it?
thank you ..
-
Okayyyy .. I dont know what wrong with yall.. but I clearly remember her first topic.. she wasnt discussing the paper .. if i had it saved coulda put it down.. she was just stating the fact that there was something wrong with the question and peopel need to report it to cie.. and if this sint the place to discuss which else is it?.. and as far as i can remember she made her very best so tht ppl didnt discuss.. you could have indeed deleted the posts of the few people who did not listen to her.. but keep her thread as in whole.. but yall still deleted it.. making no sense or whatsoever.. besides her "agressive" attitude towards you was made after her first post was deleted.. that was simply a very natural comeback for anyone.. now think for a sec.. is it even justified? thats my point.. n id appreciate it very much if u clear it ..
The thread has not been deleted. It is in a Recycle Bin to come out after the 24hr delay.
Only the abusive thread was deleted.
-
ummm.. excuse me . but can anyone like READ what i wrote and reply to it?
thank you ..
I AGREE WID U 100%
She ddnt do anything until they deleted her first topic
-
hey Rakan this got nuthing to do with u so keep out of it she just gave an example
we talking about Loco over here, and she did her best to keep her post within the limits
-
ahhhh thanks omer.. atleast we have someone thinking RATIONAL here!
-
Another thing, "rekomeko", "astarmathsandchemistry","Devil 93" whatever is his username..wasn't banned because of the name. He was banned after taking the opinions of ALL the moderators and the main adminstrators and I think we all know well why.
-
ummm.. excuse me . but can anyone like READ what i wrote and reply to it?
thank you ..
I AGREE WID U 100%
She ddnt do anything until they deleted her first topic
=D
-
Another thing, "rekomeko", "astarmathsandchemistry","Devil 93" whatever is his username..wasn't banned because of the name. He was banned after taking the opinions of ALL the moderators and the main adminstrators and I think we all know well why.
i knw tht ... wth?
ur not really tlkin abt the stuff here sweetsh ..
-
I wrote this for everyone to know, because he said the wrong reason
-
It doesn't matter if you try to keep your post within the limits or not.
One thing leads to another: Saying I dropped my pencil could lead to saying I dropped my pencil when I was trying to draw the graph in Q5 etc...
Loco93 discussed a particular question which would have helped someone who may not have taken the paper yet. This is, in essence, cheating. And there is no place for it on SF. The thread has not been deleted and will be returned to the IGCSE Forum tomorrow.
And once you take into consideration that we will not discriminate against or for anyone, that thread had to be locked and temporarily binned. Nor is there any reason to retaliate against staff members as she did.
I will accept any apologies for your behaviour over this (you can also apologise on her behalf), and may reduce her ban to 4 days.
This is if and only if you stop harassing other members too. Leave people be if they ask for it. This includes Devil93 and any other member/staff personnel.
-
DEVIL93 IS NOT A VICTIM!!
its non of his business either ..
lk past-papers ... i get wht ur seying k??
u don gotta repeat ur stuff ...
aftah 4 days .. trust me .. she wnt evn c the face of SF
unban her now ..
ds it tke tht long fr sm1 to request??
and really ...
if sm1 cusses my frnds .. u cant expect me to b cool wid it
devil93 wants to giv me hell ...
not the other way around
-
DEVIL93 IS NOT A VICTIM!!
its non of his business either ..
lk past-papers ... i get wht ur seying k??
u don gotta repeat ur stuff ...
aftah 4 days .. trust me .. she wnt evn c the face of SF
unban her now ..
ds it tke tht long fr sm1 to request??
and really ...
if sm1 cusses my frnds .. u cant expect me to b cool wid it
devil93 wants to giv me hell ...
not the other way around
Unfortunately, rules are rules.
We will not make exceptions for anyone, whether they have a support of a thousand or whether they have no support at all.
Loco93 has broken rules and thus will be punished for her actions. At the moment, it is an indefinite ban. If you, or your fellow friends apologise for your behaviour and improve your attitude, I will reduce the ban to 4 days.
-
@ past-papers.. I get what you are saying .. but honestly there is no reason to unban her after 4 days because apparentyl will be done with our IGCSE's anyhow .. guess she has enough dignity to not comeback herself.. so yeah guess we will leave it to that.. because dont think she cares anymore .. anyways ..
-
I just have 1 questions to ask y was rekomeko unbanned??? I'm fine with loco93 being banned for her behaviour but then even rekomeko should be banned for his atrocious acts. If rules are made they should be the same for evryone...if rekomeko was given a chance then even loco93 should get one.
-
I just have 1 questions to ask y was rekomeko unbanned??? I'm fine with loco93 being banned for her behaviour but then even rekomeko should be banned for his atrocious acts. If rules are made they should be the same for evryone...if rekomeko was given a chance then even loco93 should get one.
rok on!!
evn to i disagree wiv de being fin wid loco93 part
jus cus rakan ksses ur asses dsnt change rules fr him ..
-
I just have 1 questions to ask y was rekomeko unbanned??? I'm fine with loco93 being banned for her behaviour but then even rekomeko should be banned for his atrocious acts. If rules are made they should be the same for evryone...if rekomeko was given a chance then even loco93 should get one.
rok on!!
evn to i disagree wiv de being fin wid loco93 part
jus cus rakan ksses ur asses dsnt change rules fr him ..
absolutely right
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
yea ,,,
now unban on our vote ..
we got a few supportrs..
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
As I said before, it is not the people's decision as to who gets banned and for how long. The Admins and Moderators will democratically make decisions. these decisions are final.
I have no knowledge of Rekomeko or why he got banned.
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
As I said before, it is not the people's decision as to who gets banned and for how long. The Admins and Moderators will democratically make decisions. these decisions are final.
I have no knowledge of Rekomeko or why he got banned.
i have spent a longer time on the forum as compared to u have...helped ppl more than u have..i have a feeling that u consider urself superior. pls find out abt reko if u don't from the othr admins and mods. I feel we need some better admins and mods who know w8s going on on the forum,keep themselves updated and be FAIR
-
So you think the moderators and admins are not good enough?
-
So you think the moderators and admins are not good enough?
won't say all of ull. i can't say anything abt astar cuz he takes lot of efforts to organize the forum and canot devote as much time,along with teaching to these problems...and so there are admins and moderators. Sweetsh cummon let's be frank...how many reps do u earn outside chit- chat section. i am not saying ur a bad admin..never...u r very good ..and not that chit-chat section is bad or anything..admins and moderators need to mainatain a good equation with their members. If u guys potray an image of being superior nobody will want to respect u(i don't mean u sweetsh)..in general.
-
So you think the moderators and admins are not good enough?
is it hard to blv?
-
nid 404.. hats off man .. seems like ur the only rational person around to speak up? .. =]
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
As I said before, it is not the people's decision as to who gets banned and for how long. The Admins and Moderators will democratically make decisions. these decisions are final.
I have no knowledge of Rekomeko or why he got banned.
i have spent a longer time on the forum as compared to u have...helped ppl more than u have..i have a feeling that u consider urself superior. pls find out abt reko if u don't from the othr admins and mods. I feel we need some better admins and mods who know w8s going on on the forum,keep themselves updated and be FAIR
You will find that you are right. I'm more on the FEP side of things, however this does not mean I consider myself superior to anyone. In fact, I am equal too ever member of SF, as is every Moderator.
You fail to realise that I have a job, 14 Exams to revise for, as well as have 3 part-time volunteering Jobs; all of which I have to cater my time for whilst still moderating on here. AS I see it, Rekomeko was given a chance because his situation was questionable. I see that fair. Here however, we have a situation where a member has broken two main rules whilst continuing to try and get banned by possibly insulting members of the forum. her second topic created moments before banning asked her to be banned along with the forum deleted. If I recall correctly?
"R U Going to Delete this 2?" with the post saying something along the lines of I don't care if I'm banned. She tried to prove a point, a point which did not stand. All the Moderators stand by the rules, not by popular opinion.
This is the end of the matter from my end.
-
nid 404.. hats off man .. seems like ur the only rational person around to speak up? .. =]
yup
thumbs up!!
+REP !
-
So you think the moderators and admins are not good enough?
won't say all of ull. i can't say anything abt astar cuz he takes lot of efforts to organize the forum and canot devote as much time,along with teaching to these problems...and so there are admins and moderators. Sweetsh cummon let's be frank...how many reps do u earn outside chit- chat section. i am not saying ur a bad admin..never...u r very good ..and not that chit-chat section is bad or anything..admins and moderators need to mainatain a good equation with their members. If u guys potray an image of being superior nobody will want to respect u(i don't mean u sweetsh)..in general.
No-one is portraying an image of being superficially better than other members. We are simply obeying the rules of the forum. If you feel there is a problem in that, feel free to lodge a complaint about that and make a topic on the issue.
but until then, I do not see any discrimination going on, from any staff member.
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
As I said before, it is not the people's decision as to who gets banned and for how long. The Admins and Moderators will democratically make decisions. these decisions are final.
I have no knowledge of Rekomeko or why he got banned.
i have spent a longer time on the forum as compared to u have...helped ppl more than u have..i have a feeling that u consider urself superior. pls find out abt reko if u don't from the othr admins and mods. I feel we need some better admins and mods who know w8s going on on the forum,keep themselves updated and be FAIR
You will find that you are right. I'm more on the FEP side of things, however this does not mean I consider myself superior to anyone. In fact, I am equal too ever member of SF, as is every Moderator.
You fail to realise that I have a job, 14 Exams to revise for, as well as have 3 part-time volunteering Jobs; all of which I have to cater my time for whilst still moderating on here. AS I see it, Rekomeko was given a chance because his situation was questionable. I see that fair. Here however, we have a situation where a member has broken two main rules whilst continuing to try and get banned by possibly insulting members of the forum. her second topic created moments before banning asked her to be banned along with the forum deleted. If I recall correctly?
"R U Going to Delete this 2?" with the post saying something along the lines of I don't care if I'm banned. She tried to prove a point, a point which did not stand. All the Moderators stand by the rules, not by popular opinion.
This is the end of the matter from my end.
OPEN UR EYEZ
stop takin life so seriusly
gawd
its liek talkint to robots!!
-
past-papers promotes the websites esp fep. He does a lot of work behind the scenes..............................................................
-
GUYS get a life there is nothing to fight about...
Why the hell u want her back....
the exams are over anyways....
MODS and ADMINS said they will talk about it so don't be a pain the A** and wait after all they control not u they do wat they want it's their website for god's sake.......
-
No websites that depends on its users can belong to anyone. Noone claims .to own FEP now. Frankly the future is communism at least on the internet
-
So you think the moderators and admins are not good enough?
is it hard to blv?
looool...nice way of putting it :D
@crypsanity and reishamix:thanks m8. I fight against injustice..my passion completely
@past-papers:u are not authorized to end the matter(i'm speaking politely m8) I understand these problems..but if u can't handle this plz let someone who can(don't stress urself) and u say reko's matter was questionable and he was given a benefit of doubt...haha..he admitted to the problem he created and pleaded guilty..yet he was given a chance. He ruined my rep(for real) completely,used my name to abuse ppl..y was he unbanned(first of all he was banned 2 days after the incident and till then he showed no remorse)
-
REKMEKO was unbanned on a vote of the members. Next day he was banned again
but he got a chance..give loco a chance too then
As I said before, it is not the people's decision as to who gets banned and for how long. The Admins and Moderators will democratically make decisions. these decisions are final.
I have no knowledge of Rekomeko or why he got banned.
i have spent a longer time on the forum as compared to u have...helped ppl more than u have..i have a feeling that u consider urself superior. pls find out abt reko if u don't from the othr admins and mods. I feel we need some better admins and mods who know w8s going on on the forum,keep themselves updated and be FAIR
You will find that you are right. I'm more on the FEP side of things, however this does not mean I consider myself superior to anyone. In fact, I am equal too ever member of SF, as is every Moderator.
You fail to realise that I have a job, 14 Exams to revise for, as well as have 3 part-time volunteering Jobs; all of which I have to cater my time for whilst still moderating on here. AS I see it, Rekomeko was given a chance because his situation was questionable. I see that fair. Here however, we have a situation where a member has broken two main rules whilst continuing to try and get banned by possibly insulting members of the forum. her second topic created moments before banning asked her to be banned along with the forum deleted. If I recall correctly?
"R U Going to Delete this 2?" with the post saying something along the lines of I don't care if I'm banned. She tried to prove a point, a point which did not stand. All the Moderators stand by the rules, not by popular opinion.
This is the end of the matter from my end.
OPEN UR EYEZ
stop takin life so seriusly
gawd
its liek talkint to robots!!
Unfortunately, life is serious, especially when we are trying to stop cheating from going on. Once you realise this, you will agree. We cannot allow any time of cheating to go on, as this is not what SF is about.
Nor can we have people abusing/insulting other members of the forum, staff or not.
Rules are guidelines which are there to be followed. Loco93 broke these rules and was thus banned as a consequence. I have decreased her ban to 4 days.
Now please, stop worrying about this. It's something which will be discussed; but for now, the ban stands.
This thread is now locked. If there is any update on Loco93, I will post it here.