Teachers and Students > Debates
Why do creationists deny the scientific truth of Evolution and instead...?
Saladin:
Truly hilarious. You love controversial debates.
To begin with, the theory of Evolution is an assessment based on observation, by a scientist called Charles Darwin. Now, this theory has been disproved scientifically, and if you watch the Discovery channel, you will get an elaborate description of why it is disproved.
Now, if you feel that simply because Humans and monkeys look alike, then that is a very poor explanation. Science itself is against jumping to such a controversial remark.
Now, if you wish to explain the Universe and how it exists and persists, be my guest, there is no logical conclusion as to why things happen. Is everything probability? Is everything controlled, why is there a higher chance of entropy rather than creation? Logic is for Humans to explain and progress to make their lives easier, it is not to explain the nature of the Universe. Like I have said many times, logic is flawed in the making. There will always be superior logic, and often logic comes to an illogical conclusion.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Logic would dictate both, so now comes perspective. If Logic could be an explanation to all the things such as emotion, then there would be no debate.
Please refrain from getting too much into religion here please.
Freaked12:
*things progress from Order to disorder*
I'm a mistake - legalize abortion!:
Stylish and Engraved -->>>>
Snowflakes, sand dunes, tornadoes, stalactites, graded river beds, and lightning are just a few examples of order coming from disorder in nature; none require an intelligent program to achieve that order.
In any nontrivial system with lots of energy flowing through it, you are almost certain to find order arising somewhere in the system. If order from disorder is supposed to violate the 2nd law of thermodynamics, why is it ubiquitous in nature?
Freaked12:
--- Quote from: Engraved on June 21, 2010, 06:52:11 pm ---Truly hilarious. You love controversial debates.
To begin with, the theory of Evolution is an assessment based on observation, by a scientist called Charles Darwin. Now, this theory has been disproved scientifically, and if you watch the Discovery channel, you will get an elaborate description of why it is disproved.
Now, if you feel that simply because Humans and monkeys look alike, then that is a very poor explanation. Science itself is against jumping to such a controversial remark.
Now, if you wish to explain the Universe and how it exists and persists, be my guest, there is no logical conclusion as to why things happen. Is everything probability? Is everything controlled, why is there a higher chance of entropy rather than creation? Logic is for Humans to explain and progress to make their lives easier, it is not to explain the nature of the Universe. Like I have said many times, logic is flawed in the making. There will always be superior logic, and often logic comes to an illogical conclusion.
Is the glass half full or half empty? Logic would dictate both, so now comes perspective. If Logic could be an explanation to all the things such as emotion, then there would be no debate.
Please refrain from getting too much into religion here please.
--- End quote ---
Entropy :indication of unusable energy or randomness ?
I'm a mistake - legalize abortion!:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on June 21, 2010, 06:51:36 pm ---1. Because its what my religion says.
2. Because it has a more solid proof than Evolution or "No god" theory.
--- End quote ---
No proofs.... ::) ..... Blind faith...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version