Teachers and Students > Debates
Is it a fact that science can not prove everything?
nid404:
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.
elemis:
I call it hypocrisy when people sit in the comfort of their homes and question the essence of science.
If it weren't for science we'd all be dead by the age of 30 or so (considering there were no medical breakthroughs).
astarmathsandphysics:
If it weren't for science we'd all be dead by the age of 30 or so (considering there were no medical breakthroughs).
Then we wouldnt be cursed by old age.
$tyli$h Executive:
--- Quote from: astarmathsandphysics on June 25, 2010, 08:58:22 am ---If it weren't for science we'd all be dead by the age of 30 or so (considering there were no medical breakthroughs).
Then we wouldnt be cursed by old age.
--- End quote ---
I'm sure nobody wants to be dead by 30. So, old age is a blessing in fact that you can see the world for a longer period. Its not a curse if you follow health regulations strictly. You can be both healthy and old.
M-H:
dont agree with u ther xena...religion w/o science IS NOT blind..religion is pure faith..PURE faith...n that would mean faith w/o any base...any proof...science is proof..and if one goes lookin fr scientific reasons behind evrythin thats in religion...religion loses its purpose
what im sayin is that religion doesnt need science...and science is well..tryin to xplain us all hw n y n wen we evolved..while religion duznt even hav to do nethin abt Y u evolved..its jst v direct..ur ther..and then we're given a particular way thats to be folowed to lead our lives!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version