i also got the co-eff as 1.62, and i know its right, because it wasn't even a very complicated question. hope its right
in the 5th question, instead of taking the height as .45 m, i took it as 45 m
my working and method is totally right, but my figures are obviously wrong, do you think i'd get some consideration marks for that? that was 7 marks, the rest of the paper i think i did pretty good.
what was your last answer, the speed/velocity? i got 5.4 i think