Teachers and Students > Debates

Live-In Relationships-For or against?

(1/9) > >>

nid404:
In the end, it's what people want to do, but I think it is very unethical. Such relationships have nothing to hold them together...
the ones involved suffer when things don't quite work out.
Also imagine...what if the lady is pregnant, and the guy suddenly decides to leave her because he is not ready to take care of a child...I've seen such cases...Girls usually don't want to lose their child...they go ahead with the baby...no father figure to support and care for it....the child suffers.(not that this doesn't happen once u marry...but the married tag could save the relationship)

What are your views?

[Ash]:
Hmm.. Nice topic Nid. :)


Apart from Marriage, we have many relationships that needs intensive care from both sides. And some of them are natural, tied and bonded from the DAY 1! For Example, Parents care and look out for their children until they are grown ups and when they become independent, they leave their parents when their parents need them... In a long run, they give you support, protect you, provides you with every facility and never ending love of them, you treat them in this way!
When a person cant give importance to this most beautiful relation, how can they tie their bonds with their wife, friends, children etc! Ask this from those poor children who are in Orphanage  :'(

Your parents come first, if you cant treat them in this way how you can treat others???

Secondly, apart from friends, your other relatives comes then. I have heard from many people who takes this relations as a burden!  >:(

your point is true too. I mean leaving a girl like this in that condition, not only effects Girl but also the coming child, who will be deprive of his Father's love!

Last i would like to share my view point that "Death is not the greatest loss in life. The greatest loss is when relationship dies inside us while we are still alive!"

nid404:
Absolutely true

Saladin:
As many of my friends know, I am a strong fighter against casual sexual relationships. I have always believed that it was wrong.

As I have argued many time before, lust is often the most important reasons, for this, not responsibility. Time and time again, the purpose of man and woman coming together is undermined, the reason, being to weave the next ring of the web, the web of human generations.

People in these relationships are not bound by law to anything. No responsibility means that the children that are born, are illegitimate. It brings shame to both families.

So yes, definitely against, but the root of this is mainly due to casual relationships that start at teenage life. So, tbh, it is quite expected that the longer society sees bf and gf as normal, the longer this problem will persist.

Thats why you see so much of it in America, UK, Canada etc....

nid404:
I see no problem in people having gf/bf after they're old enough to look after themselves....and as long as it is not lust, but true love, eternal love...which is quite rare in today's generation
But even if you have someone you love, you can always have a bond that gives a secure feeling....live-in relationships have nothing to guard the child....if no one owns responsibility, we have abandoned kids at orphanages, like ash said

It's a pity
Yes, the west supports the trend, sadly

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page