Teachers and Students > Debates
Should drug testing on animals be allowed?
nid404:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on April 04, 2010, 11:47:58 am ---It is a fact. Doesn't matter if you deny it. :P
Its a common sense ( :P ) that we are superior to animals in thinking, logic and other abilities. They say, monkeys are 99% human. Why don't I see monkeys dominating humans, then? I watch animal planet sometimes. Enjoy it. But there is NO conclusive evidence that they are superior to human. They are often stronger, but lacks the mental ability.
Now back to the topic.
"Testing on humans? So many drugs are rejected due to harmful or poisonous effect. Human volunteers? We wouldn't kill humans or harm them by testing drugs on them. The effect on animals are often the same as the effect on humans later on. So, better test on animals and not put the life of a human at risk."
You have anything to say against this?
--- End quote ---
C'mon....everything u say isn't a fact....get it right....
Lack mental ability....ever had a pet, u'd knw....
You know how many animals have saved human lives, this is what we giv them in return....
"Testing on humans? So many drugs are rejected due to harmful or poisonous effect. Human volunteers? We wouldn't kill humans or harm them by testing drugs on them. The effect on animals are often the same as the effect on humans later on. So, better test on animals and not put the life of a human at risk."
Why don't you think the same way for animals huh? Why kill them then if not humans??!!
This is pure selfish thinking....
Next time back your statements with evidences, rather than reiterating them pointlessly
$tyli$h Executive:
Lacks mental ability - yes. Dogs are faithful. But can they interact with humans? Can they trick us? can they speak like us? Can they..........? :P
"Testing on humans? So many drugs are rejected due to harmful or poisonous effect. Human volunteers? We wouldn't kill humans or harm them by testing drugs on them. The effect on animals are often the same as the effect on humans later on. So, better test on animals and not put the life of a human at risk."
There is obvious evidence to proof this statement. Don't think I need to iterate them. Tell me if I need to get into detail. You should have understood why I said this anyway. ::)
Humans are precious than animals. Think - Would you be hurt, to a greater extent, if a human dies, or a pet? Do you read stories of animals dying on daily newspapers?
nid404:
I will only reply to your last point cause I've replied to the previous ones and clearly you haven't made any efforts to understand
To your last point, I will publish them when I have a printing press...lol...
No one cares about animals, so evn if 1000 dogs die, no one will care enough to publish them....
I am equally hurt when my pet dies or my family member dies...I've experienced both.
$tyli$h Executive:
If you think my thinking is selfish, its because its logical. Often logical statements seem selfish. :P
I can understand you are very sentimental. :P
T.Q:
--- Quote from: \m/ |\|!d \m/ on April 04, 2010, 12:14:00 pm ---.
I am equally hurt when my pet dies or my family member dies...I've experienced both.
--- End quote ---
wow ...
wat kind of relation do u have with animals ??
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version