Teachers and Students > Debates
Should drug testing on animals be allowed?
T.Q:
--- Quote from: \m/ |\|!d \m/ on April 03, 2010, 11:56:04 am ---
There's no point doing international syllabus' and calling yourself global citizens with thoughts like these....
--- End quote ---
hahahahhahaha ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
this sentence made me laugh for 3 min
can u plz tell the thoughts that made u a global citizen? and i think u should be promoted to The Universe Citizen
$tyli$h Executive:
'no point'? is that so? I really don't think so.
We have a 'point' to enable drug testing on animals - To save our fellow humans by inventing medicines against incurable diseases.
On the contrary, I see 'no point' in not allowing drugs to be tested on animals. Firstly, their population is not affected to a great extent to affect us humans (through the food chain). Secondly, human race gains because of the invention of new medicines for new diseases. What more do you want?
Angel Of Love:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on April 03, 2010, 01:50:31 pm ---Again, few animals die from drug testing. Some does, but its not enough to affect the food chain. So, we will not be affected in any way. (Letting aside the fact that only those animals who are in abundant population are used for drug testing)
You are a vegetarian - this is your problem.
--- End quote ---
i will not have any problem with me being a vegetarian.
i don't eat animals i am talking about the people who love eating non-veg they too will have very less choices than.
it is not any of my problem.
T.Q:
--- Quote from: Angel of Love on April 03, 2010, 03:24:52 pm ---i will not have any problem with me being a vegetarian.
i don't eat animals i am talking about the people who love eating non-veg they too will have very less choices than.
it is not any of my problem.
--- End quote ---
when they make drug testing on animals
they chose animal that we dont eat , like , mouse ,. .....etc
they rarely chose animal , that humans eat
because they will be afraid of any mutations to happen
Saladin:
without testing on animals, it would not be possible to ensure, that the product would not have side-effects on animals.
And thus, you would have to rely purely on theoretical info to say that something was safe. Thats wat they thought of CFCs, theoretically, they should be harmless, but they react wierd when under UV.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version