Teachers and Students > Debates
In captivity or in the Wild??
astarmathsandphysics:
If you sanitize nature you will destory the food chain and then we will all suffer. Poor people the most, cos countires like china are buying up lots of farmland to grow food to feed their own people, not the locals. Rich countires can afford to destroy their environment if there are poor people around who can be pushed off their land.
The animals were puxhed off by people, now those people are being pushed off by more powerful people.
O.T.13.:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on February 23, 2010, 04:18:40 pm ---neither. Should be kept in specially protected (in terms of the no. of tourist allowed and activities) nature parks.
--- End quote ---
Safaris*
and yes thats what i think too
astarmathsandphysics:
To have safaris you need wide open spaces, and pressure on land is such that at some point all land will be either desert or famland or paved or used to build on. There wont be much grssland left for animals
Alpha:
If we can force animals in captivity, then why not humans?
$tyli$h Executive:
The wild is comparatively a better option. Some animals should be kept in captivity (zoos) because it allows the government to earn money and spend them on better projects, especially if the country is naturally gifted with beautiful animals. Private zoos can also be established just like theme parks.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version