Teachers and Students > Debates
Should marriage be a lifelong commitment?
$tyli$h Executive:
--- Quote from: ~Alpha on February 25, 2010, 02:45:29 pm ---Boring? It's not a reason that sticks on its own. So many things are boring for some people: taking a bath everyday is boring, eating is boring, studying is boring, etc. But that does not change the normal course of life.
Besides, children are not made for temporary periods. Can you see them changing mothers and fathers every time? Then will there be the most disputes.
--- End quote ---
I have no experience of marriage. ::) Just debating. ;D
As far as the children are concerned, I agree that we should show some concern for them too. But that is a secondary issue.
--- Quote ---For me, sticking to one partner for life is not 'boring', it's a proof of integrity.
--- End quote ---
I respect your thinking. That is how I/we should think too. :)
O.T.13.:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on February 25, 2010, 02:55:34 am ---@Alpha:
I agree that there should be a little bit of restriction as far as extramarital sex is concerned. But this is just as far as it should go.
It is, of course, boring to live with only one partner for the rest of the life. It is a mental torture for both the husband and the wife to form a 'lifelong' commitment and live like that for 40 years. So to free them, it should not be a lifelong one. But a temporary commitment, with a clearly defined time period.
--- End quote ---
now that is a fling not a marriage -_-
Alpha:
LOL, I'm not married either. :P
Children; they would be my priority. That's a life, a whole new world. They deserve responsible guides.
--- Quote ---I respect your thinking. That is how I/we should think too. :)
--- End quote ---
Well. :)
--- Quote ---now that is a fling not a marriage -_-
--- End quote ---
Yup. Correct. ;)
$tyli$h Executive:
Wrong. That is the modern style of marriage, offering flexibility and therefore, keeping the number of clashes down to a minimum. It is also designed to normalize divorce. ;)
Children are of course a secondary issue. First its me, then my children. :)
O.T.13.:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on February 26, 2010, 08:07:15 am ---Wrong. That is the modern style of marriage, offering flexibility and therefore, keeping the number of clashes down to a minimum. It is also designed to normalize divorce. ;)
Children are of course a secondary issue. First its me, then my children. :)
--- End quote ---
modern style of marriage, if we're going into modern lives then marriage is not a very essential thing, hook up with some chick have half a dozen kids dump her go for the next one who cares!?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version