Teachers and Students > Debates
Death Penalty Vs Life imprisonment
Alpha:
@ Angel
I would have agreed to your opinion if the victim was given a choice too.
Thank you for joining in. :)
Keep it up ;)!
@ Borakk
My stamina is not so weak that it's going to be scared by, again, your silly comparisons. (Sorry for my frankness).
--- Quote ---I would call her A VERY WISE LADY to have considered this, BECAUSE she knew she would have got busted if she continued arguing with me. That is, she had foreseen the consequences of her actions.
--- End quote ---
Well, let's make it clear: Nid is Nid and Alpha is Alpha.
I have a recommendation for you too: drop the "bragging" and start the "debating".
P.S. You can take your time, I'm not in a hurry. School just started for me too...
$tyli$h Executive:
Alpha: in your first paragraph, you said that you do not support executing criminals on streets. Now I have a question for you too "Which method of execution would you prefer if death penalty is implemented?" Answer in a clear cut way. Either executing on streets or the 'normal' process of court. It seems to me you support the court procedures, but I need confirmation before proceeding.
I could have easily argued with other arguements too. But I need to know the answer of this question first to do so. On the other hand, I wouldn't give away my triumph card so soon, will I? And sweetie, you will soon get to know who is silly and who is not :) . Merely finding loopholes in my arguements does not necessarily make you smart. :-)
You have a great stamina? FYI I have a great persistence. 'Stamina' is more physical than mental. Winning a Debate does not require physical strength. AND winning or getting ANYTHING I want is ALL I care about, WHATEVER methods, right or wrong, I may have to apply. So, Before clicking the post button, check if your writing makes some sense.
You are not a fan of luck? Me neither! So, I wish you a bad luck this time. Doesn't make any difference does it, sweetie? :)
Worst of Luck!!! :)
Alpha:
--- Quote ---Alpha: in your first paragraph, you said that you do not support executing criminals on streets. Now I have a question for you too "Which method of execution would you prefer if death penalty is implemented?" Answer in a clear cut way. Either executing on streets or the 'normal' process of court. It seems to me you support the court procedures, but I need confirmation before proceeding.
--- End quote ---
I said it already, I will not judge. It is up to the country to decide. It is up to their government.
--- Quote ---
I could have easily argued with other arguements too. But I need to know the answer of this question first to do so. On the other hand, I wouldn't give away my triumph card so soon, will I? And sweetie, you will soon get to know who is silly and who is not Smiley . Merely finding loopholes in my arguements does not necessarily make you smart. :-)
--- End quote ---
Merely bragging does not make you smart either. I don't think am going to waste my time with your bragging and all. For the last time, if you have arguments, just start them right away and spare us the "bragging" part, we are not all sitting idle.
By the way, we write arguments*.
--- Quote ---You have a great stamina? FYI I have a great persistence. 'Stamina' is more physical than mental. Winning a Debate does not require physical strength. AND winning or getting ANYTHING I want is ALL I care about, WHATEVER methods, right or wrong, I may have to apply. So, Before clicking the post button, check if your writing makes some sense.
--- End quote ---
If you don't know the very most essence of debating, it doesn't make sense to debate then. You SHOULD be knowing that. Check your definition of "stamina". It also refers to the capability to endure things mentally for a long time, in context, to endure your blabla for all this while. If I used it, I know why I used it. Seems to me like you don't. Were it someone new, I would have urged an opponent vote. Borakk, debate, and debate correctly.
Your persistence is baseless, in case you don't know. If you win, it's going to be through the RIGHT and CORRECT methods, through your arguments, NOT your stupid disguised warnings, threats, comparisons, whatever. Sorry, have bad news for you, you are not going to win with your "WHATEVER" methods, I will henceforth ignore all the stupidities which are not supposed to be in a debate.
--- Quote ---You are not a fan of luck? Me neither! So, I wish you a bad luck this time. Doesn't make any difference does it, sweetie?
--- End quote ---
If it makes no difference, and you know it doesn't, then I think it's better to "shut up".
And since you like comparisons so much... Unlike you, I do have the courage to bear defeat. :)
$tyli$h Executive:
So, its up to the country. They will choose either hanging mercilessly within 24 hours or normal process of court hearing.
First, lets suppose they choose that merciless procedure. In this case, their expenditure is negligible. BUT the fact remains that this method is not realistic for every country. So, in case you havent noticed your ratio will only apply to a few arabian countries not for the majority. Because people of most other countries will not support this method.
In case a country choose court proceedings, the real problem arises here.
I can guess that you have absolutely no idea how much a mere visit to a lawyer costs. Take this as an example in real life.
One of my family members had an extortion case filed against him. The normal penalty for this is imprisonment for 12 years. This was back in 2008. At present the court has given the verdict of no punishment. But his expenditures till now on lawyers and others were 600000 tk or 8000 usd. This is excluding the bribes he had to pay.
Now suppose the penalty was death and his crime have been proved. In this case, he would have tried to save himself in any way possible. He would have appealed many times in the court. If his expenditure for one year is this much, imagine if the case dragged on for 5 years due to appeal.
Thus your expenditure would be greater on the death side. And most hardcore criminals are usually rich.
The fact remains that expenditures are greater on the death side compared to life imprisonment.
If a criminal gets life imprisonment penalty he is less likely to appeal. Thus the expenditures get lower. But in death sentence, he would certainly appeal and expenditures get higher due to this. And higher than life imprisonment.
Oh sweetie, I am sorry reality has been so harsh to you. Its been pretty easy for me though. It depends on how you take it. Easy for those who KISS. Difficult for those who are keen on making it difficult.
You were saying something about America donating 28 billion to poor countries. This is a very unrealistic assumption. America would never donate this because this would go against its interest. If it does, it will surely demand something in return or pursue its objectives indirectly which YOU are not capable of understanding at this level. This is logical. Because I would do the same if I was in control of US.
I take business studies, ict, economics and computing in A level.
Your assumption about the percentage figure is thus a mere assumption. Its not reality.
angell:
You may have noticed that a few days ago, nid404 was debating with me. She was replying to my arguements and I was debating perfectly on my side too. But lately, she was sacred of me -sacred of getting busted. So she stopped replying to my arguements with her. All in all, she surrendered the debate.
I would call her A VERY WISE LADY to have considered this, BECAUSE she knew she would have got busted if she continued arguing with me. That is, she had foreseen the consequences of her actions. Therefore, I would recommend you to consider the same thing - Surrender before getting busted!
Im sorry executive, you can get all stylish if you want - but this attitude doesnt hold well here.
Nid will have her reasons - this is not debating spirit!
I'd greatly appreciate it if you abstain from such pride and wool headed ness next time.
Thank You.
Oh and Alpha, SHUT UP is not appreciated either.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version