Teachers and Students > Debates
space exploration or not?
vakarian:
lol ,its not about sports ...
its a relay between two arms of galaxy ,making travelling of thousands of light years possible in few days ..
Alpha:
--- Quote from: vakarian on December 06, 2009, 09:13:43 am ---lol ,its not about sports ...
its a relay between two arms of galaxy ,making travelling of thousands of light years possible in few days ..
--- End quote ---
OK, saves time. ;D :)
staceyboy3:
--- Quote from: ~Alpha on December 06, 2009, 11:56:09 am ---OK, saves time. ;D :)
--- End quote ---
But requires a dam lot of energy. To go the speed of light you need an infinite amount of energy. Not going to happen.
Alpha:
--- Quote from: staceyboy3 on December 06, 2009, 12:25:15 pm ---But requires a dam lot of energy. To go the speed of light you need an infinite amount of energy. Not going to happen.
--- End quote ---
Why not? Space is infinite, energy too is, as far as I know. ;)
Maybe it will not happen, maybe we will die before. But surely, we can give it a try.
$tyli$h Executive:
--- Quote from: ~Alpha on December 06, 2009, 07:02:28 am ---@Lone$tar
AND on the moons of Jupiter and Mars.... :)
Sell our ONE and ONLY Moon?
Hydrogen also is a part of space, why not sell it too? And the Sun?
*Buy One Get One Free ;D :P"
I am among those who are against selling 'public property'.
How would it be were all public hospitals sold? If every road was privatized? Where would the public go?
Business is good, but not with anything.
The Moon is a UNIVERSAL property, not personal. If we keep selling, we'll soon come to a situation where EVERYTHING IS FOR HUMANS, AND NOTHING FOR HUMANITY.
Sure, we can use the resources... but I think the World Government is in a better position to take decisions regarding this. Or the NASA, but not anyone.
I had read in one of the threads here that parts of the Moon have already been sold to screen stars, something I am against, strictly against.
I only hope there are enough people in this world who will do the possible to save our Moon from the savage human grip.
P.S. *Blue, the colour of Peace ;)*.
It's a debate, the language we would use should be appropriate for making arguments. Yea, none of us would be pointing arrows at you or using abusive language. The doors are closed to close-minded people. Just do not carry discussions outside the threads. Leave all grudges here itself.
On the contrary, we're grateful that you joined here. More people, more fun. ;) Feel free to express yourself.
I hope I have been "soft".
@Omer
Very funny :P
I'll wait for the day. ;) ;D
It's good to win, but it's not bad to lose.
@Vakarian
Hehehe, abrupt and true! Agreed. :)
Sports? Wouldn't it be better to use space for SURVIVAL first? :P
--- End quote ---
Hydrogen also is a part of space, why not sell it too? And the Sun?
*Buy One Get One Free "
Hydrogen is not salable from space. Firstly, moon does not have hydrogen in its atmosphere. Secondly, hydrogen is not needed for our survival. :P Sun is too dangerous as it is too hot for us. Nobody will want to buy sun! :P I was just talking about our moon, about which we know the most and which is the least farthest from us also, easy for us to explore.
1> In case you haven't noticed, I assumed that human is in such a stage that in 10-20 years of time, they will be able to travel to moon with ease and will be able to live there with ease. I am sure they will be.
Sure, we can use the resources... but I think the World Government is in a better position to take decisions regarding this. Or the NASA, but not anyone
I had read in one of the threads here that parts of the Moon have already been sold to screen stars, something I am against, strictly against..
You misunderstood me! Suppose that NASA today is the explorer of the moon. There are also many others. The EU set up a space exploration agency to prevent the monopoly of the USA in this field. Even Bangladesh has started a project which involves building a rocket and researching space and moon by 2015. The whole 'space' is not 'cornered' entirely by NASA or any other agency. Your belief is mistaken. You mentioned that they are selling lands to us. If it becomes easy to lead life in moon, they will sell these land in more quantities to us, in order to cover their huge cost of space exploration. As they are selling land to us, we will be able to claim those land once moon becomes completely livable.
What I am talking about is that Land on the moon will probably be a very good investment if a serious problem occurs on earth (provided that condition 1 has been met). We always think for the short term. Think - if the effects of greenhouse warming occurs to the extent that even developed countries are flooded, or world war III occurs, people will look for alternative means of living. Suddenly, we can sell the land which we bought beforehand, at much higher prices to the rich citizens at that time who will be able to afford and go to moon and start a new life afresh, far from the calamities of the earth.
Business is good, but not with anything.
It is good as long as we make profit and offers good return into the future - Thats what I understand! You may have a different opinion.
EVERYTHING IS FOR HUMANS, AND NOTHING FOR HUMANITY.
We humans as being the best creature has been entitled to everything which is in the universe. It is our right to go and explore the moon!!! You must understand this!
I only hope there are enough people in this world who will do the possible to save our Moon from the savage human grip.
I'm assuming that you are 'against' this debate (ie do not want space exploration)
NB. These are my opinion only. You may have different opinions.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version