Qualification > Queries

ALL OCT/NOV PAPER DISCUSSION HERE!

<< < (91/154) > >>

dlehddud:

--- Quote from: ~~~~shreycool~~~~ on November 07, 2009, 06:04:42 am ---ya it was straight toweards left!!
that is it was inversley propotion!!!

--- End quote ---

inverse proportion? but that means T^2=1/s^2 and k=T^2*s^2 rite?
did each product of the values end up with a constant? Didn't check..  :o :o

~~~~shreyapril~~~~:
dude!!
ya it will be same!!
i did not check it but, it will be!!

aaastars:

--- Quote from: @d!_†oX!© on November 07, 2009, 05:57:19 am ---yup...i did phy p5...
dude i dont know if it ws gud or bad....
By the way how ws ur graph for the oscillation question coming???

--- End quote ---


well i guess p6 would be much easier then, cos they said this session p5 looked very easy, altho its actlly tricky and a bit tough.
all i know is for the first question, if your drew the graph as a straight line, you got it wrong. its not supposed to be a straight line. (tho inversely proportional is correct)

for second one i somehow got same results; rate of cooling for both the two methods- didnt know what did i do wrong. kinda funny.
third one my focal length was totally a joke. fouth one due to my stupidity i drew thermistor symbol instead of variable resistor (they look similar, dont they sigh.)


ITS NOT THAT HARD. just that i found it a bit tougher than the other past papers, esp june 09.
and yea ofcos, under exam condition it was easy to get dragged away. panic and stuff.

~~~~shreyapril~~~~:
dude!!
it is all over!!
it must be a straight line!!

aaastars:
its not.
although i also drew a straight line and would lose a mark or two cos of that.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version