Qualification > Sciences

Physics Discussion HERE ONLY!

<< < (14/64) > >>

MaNa:

--- Quote from: annie_angel on June 05, 2009, 12:40:30 pm ---
--- Quote from: noor92 on June 05, 2009, 04:13:36 am ---Why would you divide refractive index by one?? I did
R.I = sin i/sin r ...
1.49 = sin 35 / sin r
and my answer was 23. something

--- End quote ---

it waz 25...not 35

--- End quote ---
i dont know what i worte i have complete forgotten
but i remember it was in 20ss
5alas lets pray the threshold for this paper is loow low lowww!!!:D

annie_angel:

--- Quote from: ManaH on June 05, 2009, 12:43:46 pm ---
--- Quote from: annie_angel on June 05, 2009, 12:40:30 pm ---
--- Quote from: noor92 on June 05, 2009, 04:13:36 am ---Why would you divide refractive index by one?? I did
R.I = sin i/sin r ...
1.49 = sin 35 / sin r
and my answer was 23. something

--- End quote ---

it waz 25...not 35

--- End quote ---
i dont know what i worte i have complete forgotten
but i remember it was in 20ss
5alas lets pray the threshold for this paper is loow low lowww!!!:D

--- End quote ---

Inshaallah Inshaallah it will be!!

MR.BooMBastiC:
IT WAS 58.7 THE REFACTED RAY
IT CANNOT BE IN 28
CUZ THE INCIDENT RAY WAS 35

MaNa:

--- Quote from: MR.BooMBastiC on June 05, 2009, 12:46:52 pm ---IT WAS 58.7 THE REFACTED RAY
IT CANNOT BE IN 28
CUZ THE INCIDENT RAY WAS 35

--- End quote ---
tch i dont remember
ok w8 the critical angle was 90-35 :-\

MR.BooMBastiC:
CRITICAL ANGLE WAS 42 I CHECKED IT WITH DA PROTRACTOR

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version