Qualification > Sciences

CHEM AND BIO HELP AND TIPS HERE

<< < (28/680) > >>

@d!_†oX!©:
sorry i said vaan cuz i was reading smthng else simultaneously..sorry..
By the way Thanks shrey

~~~~shreyapril~~~~:
this in not ratio propotion!!
so here you need to take mass of both carbon and WO3!!

where as you have taken 1:3 ratio of molecules!!

got it!!

eightAs:

--- Quote from: @d!_†oX!© on November 10, 2009, 04:08:04 pm ---1)why 36g of carbon???
2)m not saying the ratio is wrong, wht i am confued about is the fact that less reducing agent is required to reduce a large amount of the substance...
i mean how can only 18g of carbon be used to reduce 116gg of WO3
my question is more practical based than theoretical.

--- End quote ---
See, the things that actually do the work are molecules. 18g of Carbon contains 3 times more molecules than 116 gms of WO3 does. Three C molecules react with one WiO3. molecule. I hope you get it now.

@d!_†oX!©:
yeah!!i think i'll have to compromise...cuz no1 actually understood my question...or perhaps m not able to convey exactly what i am confused about....anyways...thanks alot guys...

@d!_†oX!©:

--- Quote from: eightAs on November 10, 2009, 04:13:30 pm ---See, the things that actually do the work are molecules. 18g of Carbon contains 3 times more molecules than 116 gms of WO3 does. Three C molecules react with one WiO3. molecule. I hope you get it now.

--- End quote ---
ummm...i think that makes it a bit clearer...Thanks eightas

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version