Qualification > Sciences

CHEM AND BIO HELP AND TIPS HERE

<< < (27/680) > >>

~~~~shreyapril~~~~:

--- Quote from: @d!_†oX!© on November 10, 2009, 04:05:02 pm ---ohhhh shrey!!!u back again with ur faltu replies.....
this has already been proved wrong....this method is wrong...read the question for what exactly m asking b4 replying...

nd y do u relate everything in the world with a ratio??

--- End quote ---
i did not read your long meathod and explainations!!
By the way good ans aadi!!

@d!_†oX!©:

--- Quote from: A@di on November 10, 2009, 04:04:48 pm ---arre shrey that answer is rong,

@adi - dude see,

232g of WO3 reacts with 36g of C rite?

so 116g with 18g of C

y do u find the answer weird, ??  check the ratio

232-36
116-18

looks quite clear to me..

--- End quote ---

1)why 36g of carbon???
2)m not saying the ratio is wrong, wht i am confued about is the fact that less reducing agent is required to reduce a large amount of the substance...
i mean how can only 18g of carbon be used to reduce 116gg of WO3
my question is more practical based than theoretical.

~~~~shreyapril~~~~:
oye dude!!
it must be 36 cause 12 is atomic mass and we using 3 moles so 3*12=36!

@d!_†oX!©:
ohhohhh...okk..got the first ans...Thanks vaan...bt my second one??

Ghost Of Highbury:
vaan?..where is vaan's answer??

oye dude

WO3's mol. mass - 232

3C's mol. mass - 12*3 = 36

so 232g with 36g

116 -> 18g

simple.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version