Teachers and Students > Debates
Should richer nations help poorer ones in their tertiary or secondary sector?
astarmathsandphysics:
In the new today one of the stories was that wars increase in El Nino years, when the is drought and famine. In those countries it is like rats fighting each other for the last grain of rice. What a nightmare vision it will be if countries start fighting each other for that years harvest.
Alpha:
--- Quote from: astarmathsandphysics on August 08, 2011, 12:24:47 pm ---helping poorer nations should take the form frankly of showing them how to make themselves attractive to investors. anything else creates pain.
--- End quote ---
But showing them how to attract investors can hamper the progress of the 'teaching' countries. So, why would they do it anyway?
astarmathsandphysics:
Investors make money for everyone. All the poor countries have to do is make themselves attractive for investors LIKE I TRY TO MAKE MY WEBSITE ATTRACTIVE TO STUDENTS.
When I say this I refer to all the notes I write and not my blog, which is a bit like me kicking everyone under the table.
Alpha:
Lol Astar. :P
Investors make money, true. But resources are scarce. Investment should be designed wisely, at the proper time, in the proper sector, for the proper future. Not in any dig-anywhere hole.
astarmathsandphysics:
Every government has to make their country attractive to investors, but investment need not cost a lot of money to the individual. An individual can invest in themselves by reading or learning something.
Everyone who learns has a lingo to trade and the more they learn the more they can charge for it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version