General Chat NEW! The Student Forums Chatroom > Funnies
Driving and sorts.
Crooked:
--- Quote from: Dumb economist on May 27, 2011, 12:06:20 am ---1- We are too divided. Each tribe or clan will support that political party which has its clan members even if its bsf. Take PML-N who has a very loyal support group in Southern Punjab and interior Punjab or PPP which has a die-hard voter base in interior Sindh. Guys like me who have no clan will support parties like Tehrikee Insaaf or Musharraf's party who have no chance of winning because we are in a minority.
2-We are too busy feeding our family
3-We are scared of angry pathans.
4-Educated elite then eventually migrates leaving behind left over . LOL
--- End quote ---
Pathans ? LOL. :P Naswarrr. :D
And the last point isn't so true, mate. Haven't yuh heard of the guy who rejected the full scholarship he was offered by some uni in US? But hey, he's an exception ofcourse.
Pak Fer The Win. <3
$tyli$h Executive:
--- Quote from: Dumb economist on May 27, 2011, 12:06:20 am ---1- We are too divided. Each tribe or clan will support that political party which has its clan members even if its bsf. Take PML-N who has a very loyal support group in Southern Punjab and interior Punjab or PPP which has a die-hard voter base in interior Sindh. Guys like me who have no clan will support parties like Tehrikee Insaaf or Musharraf's party who have no chance of winning because we are in a minority.
2-We are too busy feeding our family
3-We are scared of angry pathans.
4-Educated elite then eventually migrates leaving behind left over . LOL
--- End quote ---
Okay forget about protest. I didn't mean that anarchy should be created to overthrow your govt. Deliberate anarchy is strictly forbidden in Islam.
Pak has so many natural resources and gifts. Huge coal and gold reserves in balouchistan, oil in karachi etc. Plus a very strong relation with China(a rapidly emerging economy). Has the oil tycoon Iran beside it. Why does your leaders go after the "ally" USA which is 10000+ km from Pak and has no interest in Pak's wellbeing when you have such strong potent and goodwilling neighbours?
Pak needs a radical shift in its foreign policy and everything will fall in place. Its as if its leaders aren't concerned about what happens to Pak as long as they get their share (Mr. 10%, specifically). I believe that shift is already taking place gradually, with military taking the lead.
Crooked:
--- Quote from: $tyli$h Executive on May 27, 2011, 04:44:39 pm ---Pak needs a radical shift in its foreign policy and everything will fall in place. Its as if its leaders aren't concerned about what happens to Pak as long as they get their share (Mr. 10%, specifically). I believe that shift is already taking place gradually, with military taking the lead.
--- End quote ---
Ahh, he isn't 10% anymore. He's like 110% now. :P No politician cares about Pakistan anymore. It's all about their job, rep, etc. Military gets corrupt too, yuh know.
All we need is a fine leader. (:
$tyli$h Executive:
--- Quote from: Crooked on May 27, 2011, 04:54:33 pm ---Ahh, he isn't 10% anymore. He's like 110% now. :P No politician cares about Pakistan anymore. It's all about their job, rep, etc. Military gets corrupt too, yuh know.
All we need is a fine leader. (:
--- End quote ---
Yes, and make sure that the next election is not rigged like the previous one.
lol, no. Your military has been corrupt (not in the truest sense, they just followed musharraf's policy) for 8-10 years under musharraf regime by being US puppets (which was musharraf's strategy). But they've identified their real enemies now and are changing silently - because lets face it - no radical change is possible under the traitor civilian leadership.
Don't worry. The strategy of your military (now), China, Russia and all other countries around is to just prolong US stay in afghanistan and even encourage them. ;)
Those who have studied the demise of USSR will understand what I mean.
$tyli$h Executive:
And lol :D This is humour board and we are discussing something serious. ::)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version