« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Physics CIE  (Read 1048 times)

Offline yasser37

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
  • Reputation: 2832
Physics CIE
« on: May 09, 2011, 10:28:07 am »
Hi
can anyone explain the table in november 10 paper 41
ques. 2
part 3
Logged

Offline Sue T

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • Reputation: 5415
  • Gender: Female
Re: Physics CIE
« Reply #1 on: May 09, 2011, 12:01:11 pm »
p to Q : work done on gas: its a decrease in volume at constant pressure so simply use :
delta W = P x delta V
           = 4 x 10^5 x (8-2) x 10^ -4
           = 240 J
so the increase in internal energy for that row would be -360 J
Q to R is obviously +720
now R to P you have 2 start with  the right hand side of the table :
now the total chng in internal energy for this cycle is zero ryt? since you end up where you started
so the entire right hand side column should add up 2 zero therefore:
-360 + 720 + x = 0
x = -360
now check the bottom row and make it add up
x + 480 = -360
x = -840
so r to P work done on gas is -840J

thats it
Logged
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad.

Offline aldehyde1612

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: 22180
  • Gender: Female
Re: Physics CIE
« Reply #2 on: May 09, 2011, 12:07:53 pm »
Is that a)iii ... or b)iii

cause for a)iii ... Ideal gases dont have potential energy so internal energy is the sum of the kinetic energy of all the molecules, and kinetic energy is proportional to the temperature of the gas.? <Ek>= 3/2 kT .. right?

and b)iii. I dont know about that cause the marking scheme has the numbers all wrong.
Logged
.We know a little about a lot of things; Just enough to make us dangerous.

Offline Sue T

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • Reputation: 5415
  • Gender: Female
Re: Physics CIE
« Reply #3 on: May 09, 2011, 12:24:36 pm »
he said table so i assumed the table...
Logged
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in fruit salad.

Offline aldehyde1612

  • SF Immigrant
  • **
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: 22180
  • Gender: Female
Re: Physics CIE
« Reply #4 on: May 09, 2011, 12:46:02 pm »
oh. lol. yeah you're right. sorry, I didnt read the post properly.
But thanks for that explanation.. I didnt know how to do that last row.  ;D
Logged
.We know a little about a lot of things; Just enough to make us dangerous.

Offline yasser37

  • SF Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
  • Reputation: 2832
Re: Physics CIE
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2011, 06:01:21 pm »
that's how I did it but the markin scheme had different answers :S

thanks though mate
I thought I was doing things wrong
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »